21:1321:13, 26 February 2023diffhist−13,351
Great Migrations of the Serbs
User Saintstephen000 does not reply to respectable pre-editing questions in Talk section. This article is dealing with Migrations of Serbs - next to all the areas Serbs were migrating from and even more of those they migrated to, it spends 50% of the whole article text in the last section to cover the topic of Albanians being autochthonous population in Kosovo. This is very biased and not acceptable. After the edits I am starting the reporting procedure for user Saintstephen000Tags: UndoReverted
23:2023:20, 25 February 2023diffhist−13,351
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing the whole section "Modern Analysis". The whole text was obviously put with premeditation to build idea about Kosovo being Albanian territory through history permanently. Without any intention to discuss that idea, a text titled "Great Migrations of Serbs" in which the whole summary is built on the presentation about Kosovo being permanently Albanian is not just far from the correct logical form, but is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical. I am reporting the textTag: Reverted
23:0023:00, 25 February 2023diffhist−299
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing two highly problematic and intellectually poor sentences, just copy/pasted around the text, that do not have any true meaning, but only open doubts about motives of the author. They reportedly reference external scientific sources, but their content is problematically poor.Tag: Reverted
22:5422:54, 25 February 2023diffhist−586
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing a sentence which opens doubts above motives of the text. Why would the text at the opening, high-level outlook of the people migration, bring ethical and emotionally colored discussion on something like Serbs not being invited, but coming there as they did not have integrity (probably) to fight for their rights were there lived before. The text is quite likely composed by somebody building anti-Serbian narrative for political causes in Kosovo or Croatia. It is not unbiased.Tag: Reverted
22:4322:43, 25 February 2023diffhist−432
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing the sentence as next to having several grammar errors, it does not have any true or quality meaning and brings strong doubts about motives of the author. It cites a scientific resource, but the sentence itself is meaningless and quite problematic.Tag: Reverted
22:3622:36, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3522:35, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3322:33, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3322:33, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:2722:27, 25 February 2023diffhist−145
Great Migrations of the Serbs
The removed sentence is grammatically incorrect English, it is semantically absurd and in any assumed meaning (if that would have been anyhow possible logically) it would not have no justification in scientific sources or even general public notion. The sentence is an unskilled introduction to insert some biased content.Tag: Reverted
21:1321:13, 26 February 2023diffhist−13,351
Great Migrations of the Serbs
User Saintstephen000 does not reply to respectable pre-editing questions in Talk section. This article is dealing with Migrations of Serbs - next to all the areas Serbs were migrating from and even more of those they migrated to, it spends 50% of the whole article text in the last section to cover the topic of Albanians being autochthonous population in Kosovo. This is very biased and not acceptable. After the edits I am starting the reporting procedure for user Saintstephen000Tags: UndoReverted
23:2023:20, 25 February 2023diffhist−13,351
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing the whole section "Modern Analysis". The whole text was obviously put with premeditation to build idea about Kosovo being Albanian territory through history permanently. Without any intention to discuss that idea, a text titled "Great Migrations of Serbs" in which the whole summary is built on the presentation about Kosovo being permanently Albanian is not just far from the correct logical form, but is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical. I am reporting the textTag: Reverted
23:0023:00, 25 February 2023diffhist−299
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing two highly problematic and intellectually poor sentences, just copy/pasted around the text, that do not have any true meaning, but only open doubts about motives of the author. They reportedly reference external scientific sources, but their content is problematically poor.Tag: Reverted
22:5422:54, 25 February 2023diffhist−586
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing a sentence which opens doubts above motives of the text. Why would the text at the opening, high-level outlook of the people migration, bring ethical and emotionally colored discussion on something like Serbs not being invited, but coming there as they did not have integrity (probably) to fight for their rights were there lived before. The text is quite likely composed by somebody building anti-Serbian narrative for political causes in Kosovo or Croatia. It is not unbiased.Tag: Reverted
22:4322:43, 25 February 2023diffhist−432
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing the sentence as next to having several grammar errors, it does not have any true or quality meaning and brings strong doubts about motives of the author. It cites a scientific resource, but the sentence itself is meaningless and quite problematic.Tag: Reverted
22:3622:36, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3522:35, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3322:33, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:3322:33, 25 February 2023diffhist−4
Great Migrations of the Serbs
Removing "the" in front of "Serbs". Definite article should not be used in front of names of nations. The Serbs would mean author refers to a specific group of Serbs mentioned before. Uneducated manner of the whole text leaves strong doubts about its authenticity and objectivity.
22:2722:27, 25 February 2023diffhist−145
Great Migrations of the Serbs
The removed sentence is grammatically incorrect English, it is semantically absurd and in any assumed meaning (if that would have been anyhow possible logically) it would not have no justification in scientific sources or even general public notion. The sentence is an unskilled introduction to insert some biased content.Tag: Reverted