This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Serbs have built churches in Kosovo according to the Serbian calendar that shows Year 7530 in 2021/22 ! Neolithic sites like Lepenski Vir, Vinca, Starcevo... prove that Serbs have been living in this religion OF THE BLAKANS at least for 10 000 years (genetic studies - google: Paleolithic genes Serbian population - search haplogroup I2a). So, writing about Slavonic coming in VII century to the Balkans is an Albanian/VATICAN'S invention to steal not only Serbian lands but the Ilirian name and space of indegious population. I suggest to erase the paragraph about Albanian origins as Ilirians because there are so much documents that treat Serbs as Ilirians (from Ilia = Serbian pre-Christian God). It's so obvious that Vatican's agents still write here for Wikipedia?! They invented a fake history for Albanians (who brought J and E haplogoups to the Balkans) and allowed them to steal Kosovo, to burn Serbian Orthodox churches down and steal cultural identity! I ask wikipedia to control sources and stop criminal Vatican's activity on Wikipedia, once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:6067:3400:2D39:CB3E:7985:E849 ( talk) 07:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Saintstephen000, before any further discussion, provide explanation for reinserting a sentence with such a poor semantics like: "The masses of earlier migrations from the Ottoman Empire are considered ethnically Serb, and those of the First Great Migration nationally Serb." Bbbgsr ( talk) 23:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Saintstephen000, provide explanation for why would an article on Migrations of Serbs, have the whole summary dealing with the topic of Kosovo always being an Albanian land ? Next to this missing the logical structure completely, it is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical. Why do you keep reverting "Modern Analysis" section? Provide justification for the motives. I will push this to the end and revert as many times as needed, but before that I am patiently waiting for your explanation to understand this. Political agitations of this type are highly prohibited and unethical ! Bbbgsr ( talk) 23:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Should Pietro Bogdani be added as a source, regarding the ethnic composition of Kosovo in 1685, especially because he was heavily involved with the Austrian war efforts in conquering Kosovo? ShockedSkater ( talk) 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is about Serb migrations and should include information about that, not about Albanian toponyms in Kosovo, Albanian population in Prizren etc. There are other articles dealing with that Theonewithreason ( talk) 08:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Serbs have built churches in Kosovo according to the Serbian calendar that shows Year 7530 in 2021/22 ! Neolithic sites like Lepenski Vir, Vinca, Starcevo... prove that Serbs have been living in this religion OF THE BLAKANS at least for 10 000 years (genetic studies - google: Paleolithic genes Serbian population - search haplogroup I2a). So, writing about Slavonic coming in VII century to the Balkans is an Albanian/VATICAN'S invention to steal not only Serbian lands but the Ilirian name and space of indegious population. I suggest to erase the paragraph about Albanian origins as Ilirians because there are so much documents that treat Serbs as Ilirians (from Ilia = Serbian pre-Christian God). It's so obvious that Vatican's agents still write here for Wikipedia?! They invented a fake history for Albanians (who brought J and E haplogoups to the Balkans) and allowed them to steal Kosovo, to burn Serbian Orthodox churches down and steal cultural identity! I ask wikipedia to control sources and stop criminal Vatican's activity on Wikipedia, once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:6067:3400:2D39:CB3E:7985:E849 ( talk) 07:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Saintstephen000, before any further discussion, provide explanation for reinserting a sentence with such a poor semantics like: "The masses of earlier migrations from the Ottoman Empire are considered ethnically Serb, and those of the First Great Migration nationally Serb." Bbbgsr ( talk) 23:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Saintstephen000, provide explanation for why would an article on Migrations of Serbs, have the whole summary dealing with the topic of Kosovo always being an Albanian land ? Next to this missing the logical structure completely, it is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical. Why do you keep reverting "Modern Analysis" section? Provide justification for the motives. I will push this to the end and revert as many times as needed, but before that I am patiently waiting for your explanation to understand this. Political agitations of this type are highly prohibited and unethical ! Bbbgsr ( talk) 23:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Should Pietro Bogdani be added as a source, regarding the ethnic composition of Kosovo in 1685, especially because he was heavily involved with the Austrian war efforts in conquering Kosovo? ShockedSkater ( talk) 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is about Serb migrations and should include information about that, not about Albanian toponyms in Kosovo, Albanian population in Prizren etc. There are other articles dealing with that Theonewithreason ( talk) 08:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)