05:3605:36, 28 February 2018diffhist+23
NOBUS
Slightly changed the decidedly non-neutral "so keeping significant vulnerabilities which affect U.S. systems secret is a conflict of interest" sentence to something that makes clearer that that is an argument of critics, not a consensus-established fact.
27 August 2017
02:0002:00, 27 August 2017diffhist+94
M982 Excalibur
minor fix just to save/implement a small bit of stray missing text that was intended for previous edit (as fully described in the summary for that edit)
01:4801:48, 27 August 2017diffhist+481
M982 Excalibur
Added 2016 info on procurement cost. Fleshed out introduction slightly more, inc. to refer to development of new versions as described extensively in existing article body.
14 August 2017
02:3302:33, 14 August 2017diffhist+77
2010 Yeonpyeong bombardment
Removed inappropriate "Decisive Victory" label for the incident. Unclear in what sense the incident was a "victory" for the North. But it clearly wasn't "decisive" of anything.
05:3605:36, 28 February 2018diffhist+23
NOBUS
Slightly changed the decidedly non-neutral "so keeping significant vulnerabilities which affect U.S. systems secret is a conflict of interest" sentence to something that makes clearer that that is an argument of critics, not a consensus-established fact.
27 August 2017
02:0002:00, 27 August 2017diffhist+94
M982 Excalibur
minor fix just to save/implement a small bit of stray missing text that was intended for previous edit (as fully described in the summary for that edit)
01:4801:48, 27 August 2017diffhist+481
M982 Excalibur
Added 2016 info on procurement cost. Fleshed out introduction slightly more, inc. to refer to development of new versions as described extensively in existing article body.
14 August 2017
02:3302:33, 14 August 2017diffhist+77
2010 Yeonpyeong bombardment
Removed inappropriate "Decisive Victory" label for the incident. Unclear in what sense the incident was a "victory" for the North. But it clearly wasn't "decisive" of anything.