15:2115:21, 20 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
Undid revision 1018900993 by
Martinevans123 (
talk) Again, this was the original text until it was changed. If you feel strongly about it why don’t you start it on the TP? Also, Hughes is reliable enough & not the only source.Tag: Undo
14:1114:11, 20 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
Undid revision 1018828089 by
Freshacconci (
talk) No, I didn’t change it, it was changed. This was the original text. Also, there are two sources, one of them doesn’t refer to your edit at all.Tags: UndoReverted
19 April 2021
22:3522:35, 19 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
This what was written before, based on multiple sources, not only Hughes. Go to the talk page if you disagree.Tag: Reverted
15:2115:21, 20 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
Undid revision 1018900993 by
Martinevans123 (
talk) Again, this was the original text until it was changed. If you feel strongly about it why don’t you start it on the TP? Also, Hughes is reliable enough & not the only source.Tag: Undo
14:1114:11, 20 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
Undid revision 1018828089 by
Freshacconci (
talk) No, I didn’t change it, it was changed. This was the original text. Also, there are two sources, one of them doesn’t refer to your edit at all.Tags: UndoReverted
19 April 2021
22:3522:35, 19 April 2021diffhist−67
Piet Mondrian
This what was written before, based on multiple sources, not only Hughes. Go to the talk page if you disagree.Tag: Reverted