13:2613:26, 1 June 2022diffhist+19
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
Yeah 4 editiors and none can provide a source. All I wanted was to be able to click a link and read more about this statement. Since no source is provided I followed RULE OF WIKIPEDIA and removed it. It NEVER says anything about the talk page or whatever little society all 4 of you are in together. JUST GIVE ME THE SOURCE AND I WILL LEAVE!!!!Tag: Reverted
13:0513:05, 1 June 2022diffhist−104
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
The intro rules do not allow blatant falsities to be put in intro even if citation rules are bypassed. More importantly this statement is proved false by the very next sentence and should be removed either way. This article is contradicting itself within one paragraph.Tag: Reverted
13:0013:00, 1 June 2022diffhist+18
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
This isn't even true but I am providing this chance for someone to find and cite a source. Since I believe it can't be found by the rules I should remove this sentence completely to reduce the citation needed "spam" but I am giving you the chance to CITE A SOURCE??!?!?Tag: Reverted
12:5012:50, 1 June 2022diffhist−87
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
This statements need citations for their sources OR MAYBE THEY HAVE NO SOURCES.....???. These are the rules. This is not a driveby. I am going through the entire article. I don't have an account nor will I make one. My name is Ross. This is supposed to be an encylopedia you need to cite sources.. .. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Citation_neededTags: Revertedreferences removed
03:4703:47, 1 June 2022diffhist−163
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
→Background: This statement has no place in a reference source because it holds no true meaning. It also makes no sense in the context of the paragraph and confuses the reader. It also has no source and therefore is not verifiable and therefore doesn't belong on the page.Tag: references removed
13:2613:26, 1 June 2022diffhist+19
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
Yeah 4 editiors and none can provide a source. All I wanted was to be able to click a link and read more about this statement. Since no source is provided I followed RULE OF WIKIPEDIA and removed it. It NEVER says anything about the talk page or whatever little society all 4 of you are in together. JUST GIVE ME THE SOURCE AND I WILL LEAVE!!!!Tag: Reverted
13:0513:05, 1 June 2022diffhist−104
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
The intro rules do not allow blatant falsities to be put in intro even if citation rules are bypassed. More importantly this statement is proved false by the very next sentence and should be removed either way. This article is contradicting itself within one paragraph.Tag: Reverted
13:0013:00, 1 June 2022diffhist+18
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
This isn't even true but I am providing this chance for someone to find and cite a source. Since I believe it can't be found by the rules I should remove this sentence completely to reduce the citation needed "spam" but I am giving you the chance to CITE A SOURCE??!?!?Tag: Reverted
12:5012:50, 1 June 2022diffhist−87
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
This statements need citations for their sources OR MAYBE THEY HAVE NO SOURCES.....???. These are the rules. This is not a driveby. I am going through the entire article. I don't have an account nor will I make one. My name is Ross. This is supposed to be an encylopedia you need to cite sources.. .. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Citation_neededTags: Revertedreferences removed
03:4703:47, 1 June 2022diffhist−163
Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
→Background: This statement has no place in a reference source because it holds no true meaning. It also makes no sense in the context of the paragraph and confuses the reader. It also has no source and therefore is not verifiable and therefore doesn't belong on the page.Tag: references removed