23:1123:11, 5 January 2024diffhist+1,067
Kabulistan
Added more accuracy to this pretty void pages, it'll be a good idea to quote Afghan historian Ghulam Muhammad Ghobar to have more accuracy on the geography and history of Kabul and Kabulistan.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
18:3818:38, 4 January 2024diffhist−499
Ghazni
Quoting André Wink about Afghanistan is liké quoting Marcel Granet about Mongolia. His claims contradictory. Claiming Ghazni to be part of the Indian subcontinent until the 9th century makes no sense to begin with because the idea of an Indian subcontinent dates only from a couples of decades. Wink's own claimed Arab sources say that today's Ghazni is part of the Khorasan marches, Indian sources themselves considered greater Ghazni and greater Kabul to be barbarians i.e not Indian.Tags: references removedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
3 January 2024
02:1502:15, 3 January 2024diffhist−539
Kabulistan
Never was the region considered part of the Indian subcontinent since the Indian subcontinent is a recent concept which stops on its western side in Pakistan. Secondly the region historically was never considered part of Al Hind too whether during Abbasid or later periods. It was considered something between Al Khorasan and Al Hind, or even sometimes an extension of Khorasan (cf Khorasan Marches). It's well knows its inhabitants were Iranics (Kambojans/Kapisean people and other various tribes).Tags: Revertedreferences removedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
23:1123:11, 5 January 2024diffhist+1,067
Kabulistan
Added more accuracy to this pretty void pages, it'll be a good idea to quote Afghan historian Ghulam Muhammad Ghobar to have more accuracy on the geography and history of Kabul and Kabulistan.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
18:3818:38, 4 January 2024diffhist−499
Ghazni
Quoting André Wink about Afghanistan is liké quoting Marcel Granet about Mongolia. His claims contradictory. Claiming Ghazni to be part of the Indian subcontinent until the 9th century makes no sense to begin with because the idea of an Indian subcontinent dates only from a couples of decades. Wink's own claimed Arab sources say that today's Ghazni is part of the Khorasan marches, Indian sources themselves considered greater Ghazni and greater Kabul to be barbarians i.e not Indian.Tags: references removedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
3 January 2024
02:1502:15, 3 January 2024diffhist−539
Kabulistan
Never was the region considered part of the Indian subcontinent since the Indian subcontinent is a recent concept which stops on its western side in Pakistan. Secondly the region historically was never considered part of Al Hind too whether during Abbasid or later periods. It was considered something between Al Khorasan and Al Hind, or even sometimes an extension of Khorasan (cf Khorasan Marches). It's well knows its inhabitants were Iranics (Kambojans/Kapisean people and other various tribes).Tags: Revertedreferences removedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit