12:2312:23, 7 March 2016diffhist−14
Sumer
rm "caucasoid" - typically unsubstantiated white supremist pov revisionism, it is widely acknowledged they did NOT describe themselves as caucasoidTag: wikilinks removed
21:2821:28, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
won't do the coutesy of engaging in discussion to discuss non neutral wording, translates to "no can do". You engage in discussion as per normal protocol, here as elsewhere on wp
19:5219:52, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
Undid revision 708644709 trying to unilaterally shoehorn and ramrod your nin neutral version in and refusing talkpage wont solve the issue. you need to justify your wording, stop being dismissive like you own the article & wont address dissent
19:1119:11, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
Undid revision 708637929 by
VVVladimir (
talk) ok, you'd rather edit war your version, insist it is neutral and refuse to discuss, we can certainly continue that indefinitely then
17:4917:49, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
when I said "should be discussed" simply reinstating it & starting right off with sock accusations isn't what I meant, read
wp:brd obviously non neutral additions when there are other povs, are going to be disputed
20:0820:08, 5 March 2016diffhist−271
Getae
Undid revision 708461157 by
VVVladimir (
talk) should be discussed, the wording is pushing a pov with a 2015 source in contradiction to previous
12:2312:23, 7 March 2016diffhist−14
Sumer
rm "caucasoid" - typically unsubstantiated white supremist pov revisionism, it is widely acknowledged they did NOT describe themselves as caucasoidTag: wikilinks removed
21:2821:28, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
won't do the coutesy of engaging in discussion to discuss non neutral wording, translates to "no can do". You engage in discussion as per normal protocol, here as elsewhere on wp
19:5219:52, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
Undid revision 708644709 trying to unilaterally shoehorn and ramrod your nin neutral version in and refusing talkpage wont solve the issue. you need to justify your wording, stop being dismissive like you own the article & wont address dissent
19:1119:11, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
Undid revision 708637929 by
VVVladimir (
talk) ok, you'd rather edit war your version, insist it is neutral and refuse to discuss, we can certainly continue that indefinitely then
17:4917:49, 6 March 2016diffhist−1,401
Getae
when I said "should be discussed" simply reinstating it & starting right off with sock accusations isn't what I meant, read
wp:brd obviously non neutral additions when there are other povs, are going to be disputed
20:0820:08, 5 March 2016diffhist−271
Getae
Undid revision 708461157 by
VVVladimir (
talk) should be discussed, the wording is pushing a pov with a 2015 source in contradiction to previous