Peptide chain release factor, bacterial Class 1 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||||
Symbol | PCRF | ||||||||
Pfam | PF03462 | ||||||||
InterPro | IPR005139 | ||||||||
|
Peptide chain release factor, bacterial Class 1, PTH domain, GGQ | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||||
Symbol | RF-1 | ||||||||
Pfam | PF00472 | ||||||||
Pfam clan | CL0337 | ||||||||
InterPro | IPR000352 | ||||||||
PROSITE | PS00745 | ||||||||
|
Peptide chain release factor eRF1/aRF1 | |
---|---|
Identifiers | |
Symbol | ? |
InterPro | IPR004403 |
A release factor is a protein that allows for the termination of translation by recognizing the termination codon or stop codon in an mRNA sequence. They are named so because they release new peptides from the ribosome.
During translation of mRNA, most codons are recognized by "charged" tRNA molecules, called aminoacyl-tRNAs because they are adhered to specific amino acids corresponding to each tRNA's anticodon. In the standard genetic code, there are three mRNA stop codons: UAG ("amber"), UAA ("ochre"), and UGA ("opal" or "umber"). Although these stop codons are triplets just like ordinary codons, they are not decoded by tRNAs. It was discovered by Mario Capecchi in 1967 that, instead, tRNAs do not ordinarily recognize stop codons at all, and that what he named "release factor" was not a tRNA molecule but a protein. [1] Later, it was demonstrated that different release factors recognize different stop codons. [2]
There are two classes of release factors. Class 1 release factors recognize stop codons; they bind to the A site of the ribosome in a way mimicking that of tRNA, releasing the new polypeptide as it disassembles the ribosome. [3] [4] Class 2 release factors are GTPases that enhance the activity of class 1 release factors. It helps the class 1 RF dissociate from the ribosome. [5]
Bacterial release factors include RF1, RF2, and RF3 (or PrfA, PrfB, PrfC in the "peptide release factor" gene nomenclature). RF1 and RF2 are class 1 RFs: RF1 recognizes UAA and UAG while RF2 recognizes UAA and UGA. RF3 is the class 2 release factor. [6] Eukaryotic and archaeal release factors are named analogously, with the naming changed to "eRF" for "eukaryotic release factor" and vice versa. a/eRF1 can recognize all three stop codons, while eRF3 (archaea use aEF-1α instead) works just like RF3. [6] [7]
The bacterial and archaeo-eukaryotic release factors are believed to have evolved separately. The two groups class 1 factors do not show sequence or structural homology with each other. [8] [9] The homology in class 2 is restricted to the fact that both are GTPases. It is believed that (b)RF3 evolved from EF-G while eRF3 evolved from eEF1α. [10]
In line with their symbiotic origin, eukaryotic mitochondria and plastids use bacterial-type class I release factors. [11] As of April 2019 [update], no definite reports of an organellar class II release factor can be found.
Crystal structures have been solved for bacterial 70S ribosome bound to each of the three release factors, revealing details in codon recognition by RF1/2 and the EF-G-like rotation of RF3. [12] Cryo-EM structures have been obtained for eukaryotic mamallian 80S ribosome bound to eRF1 and/or eRF3, providing a view of structural rearrangements caused by the factors. Fitting the EM images to previously known crystal structures of individual parts provides identification and a more detailed view of the process. [13] [14]
In both systems, the class II (e)RF3 binds to the universal GTPase site on the ribosome, while the class I RFs occupy the A site. [12]
The bacterial class 1 release factors can be divided into four domains. The catalytically-import domains are: [12]
P[AV]T
in RF1 and SPF
in RF2. Only one residue actually participates in stop codon recognition via hydrogen bonding.As RF1/2 sits in the A site of the ribosome, domains 2, 3, and 4 occupy the space that tRNAs load into during elongation. Stop codon recognition activates the RF, promoting a compact to open conformation change, [15] sending the GGQ motif to the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) next to the 3′ end of the P-site tRNA. By hydrolysis of the peptidyl-tRNA ester bond, which displayed pH-dependence in vitro, [16] the peptide is cut loose and released. RF3 is still needed to release RF1/2 from this translation termination complex. [12]
After releasing the peptide, ribosomal recycling is still required to empty the P-site tRNA and mRNA out to make the ribosome usable again. This is done by splitting the ribosome with factors like IF1– IF3 or RRF– EF-G. [17]
eRF1 can be broken down into four domains: N-terminal (N), Middle (M), C-terminal (C), plus a minidomain:
TASNIKS
and YxCxxxF
.Unlike in the bacterial version, eRF1–eRF3–GTP binds together into a sub-complex, via a GRFTLRD
motif on RF3. Stop codon recognition makes eRF3 hydrolyze the GTP, and the resulting movement puts the GGQ into the PTC to allow for hydrolysis. The movement also causes a +2-nt movement of the
toeprint of the pre-termination complex.
[13] The archaeal aRF1–EF1α–GTP complex is similar.
[18] The triggering mechanism is similar to that of
aa-tRNA–
EF-Tu–GTP.
[14]
A homologous system is Dom34/ Pelota– Hbs1, a eukaryotic system that breaks up stalled ribosomes. It does not have GGQ. [14] The recycling and breakup is mediated by ABCE1. [19] [20]
Standard methods of sequence comparison do not show significant similarity between the prokaryotic factors RF1/2 and RF1
Peptide chain release factor, bacterial Class 1 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||||
Symbol | PCRF | ||||||||
Pfam | PF03462 | ||||||||
InterPro | IPR005139 | ||||||||
|
Peptide chain release factor, bacterial Class 1, PTH domain, GGQ | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||||
Symbol | RF-1 | ||||||||
Pfam | PF00472 | ||||||||
Pfam clan | CL0337 | ||||||||
InterPro | IPR000352 | ||||||||
PROSITE | PS00745 | ||||||||
|
Peptide chain release factor eRF1/aRF1 | |
---|---|
Identifiers | |
Symbol | ? |
InterPro | IPR004403 |
A release factor is a protein that allows for the termination of translation by recognizing the termination codon or stop codon in an mRNA sequence. They are named so because they release new peptides from the ribosome.
During translation of mRNA, most codons are recognized by "charged" tRNA molecules, called aminoacyl-tRNAs because they are adhered to specific amino acids corresponding to each tRNA's anticodon. In the standard genetic code, there are three mRNA stop codons: UAG ("amber"), UAA ("ochre"), and UGA ("opal" or "umber"). Although these stop codons are triplets just like ordinary codons, they are not decoded by tRNAs. It was discovered by Mario Capecchi in 1967 that, instead, tRNAs do not ordinarily recognize stop codons at all, and that what he named "release factor" was not a tRNA molecule but a protein. [1] Later, it was demonstrated that different release factors recognize different stop codons. [2]
There are two classes of release factors. Class 1 release factors recognize stop codons; they bind to the A site of the ribosome in a way mimicking that of tRNA, releasing the new polypeptide as it disassembles the ribosome. [3] [4] Class 2 release factors are GTPases that enhance the activity of class 1 release factors. It helps the class 1 RF dissociate from the ribosome. [5]
Bacterial release factors include RF1, RF2, and RF3 (or PrfA, PrfB, PrfC in the "peptide release factor" gene nomenclature). RF1 and RF2 are class 1 RFs: RF1 recognizes UAA and UAG while RF2 recognizes UAA and UGA. RF3 is the class 2 release factor. [6] Eukaryotic and archaeal release factors are named analogously, with the naming changed to "eRF" for "eukaryotic release factor" and vice versa. a/eRF1 can recognize all three stop codons, while eRF3 (archaea use aEF-1α instead) works just like RF3. [6] [7]
The bacterial and archaeo-eukaryotic release factors are believed to have evolved separately. The two groups class 1 factors do not show sequence or structural homology with each other. [8] [9] The homology in class 2 is restricted to the fact that both are GTPases. It is believed that (b)RF3 evolved from EF-G while eRF3 evolved from eEF1α. [10]
In line with their symbiotic origin, eukaryotic mitochondria and plastids use bacterial-type class I release factors. [11] As of April 2019 [update], no definite reports of an organellar class II release factor can be found.
Crystal structures have been solved for bacterial 70S ribosome bound to each of the three release factors, revealing details in codon recognition by RF1/2 and the EF-G-like rotation of RF3. [12] Cryo-EM structures have been obtained for eukaryotic mamallian 80S ribosome bound to eRF1 and/or eRF3, providing a view of structural rearrangements caused by the factors. Fitting the EM images to previously known crystal structures of individual parts provides identification and a more detailed view of the process. [13] [14]
In both systems, the class II (e)RF3 binds to the universal GTPase site on the ribosome, while the class I RFs occupy the A site. [12]
The bacterial class 1 release factors can be divided into four domains. The catalytically-import domains are: [12]
P[AV]T
in RF1 and SPF
in RF2. Only one residue actually participates in stop codon recognition via hydrogen bonding.As RF1/2 sits in the A site of the ribosome, domains 2, 3, and 4 occupy the space that tRNAs load into during elongation. Stop codon recognition activates the RF, promoting a compact to open conformation change, [15] sending the GGQ motif to the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) next to the 3′ end of the P-site tRNA. By hydrolysis of the peptidyl-tRNA ester bond, which displayed pH-dependence in vitro, [16] the peptide is cut loose and released. RF3 is still needed to release RF1/2 from this translation termination complex. [12]
After releasing the peptide, ribosomal recycling is still required to empty the P-site tRNA and mRNA out to make the ribosome usable again. This is done by splitting the ribosome with factors like IF1– IF3 or RRF– EF-G. [17]
eRF1 can be broken down into four domains: N-terminal (N), Middle (M), C-terminal (C), plus a minidomain:
TASNIKS
and YxCxxxF
.Unlike in the bacterial version, eRF1–eRF3–GTP binds together into a sub-complex, via a GRFTLRD
motif on RF3. Stop codon recognition makes eRF3 hydrolyze the GTP, and the resulting movement puts the GGQ into the PTC to allow for hydrolysis. The movement also causes a +2-nt movement of the
toeprint of the pre-termination complex.
[13] The archaeal aRF1–EF1α–GTP complex is similar.
[18] The triggering mechanism is similar to that of
aa-tRNA–
EF-Tu–GTP.
[14]
A homologous system is Dom34/ Pelota– Hbs1, a eukaryotic system that breaks up stalled ribosomes. It does not have GGQ. [14] The recycling and breakup is mediated by ABCE1. [19] [20]
Standard methods of sequence comparison do not show significant similarity between the prokaryotic factors RF1/2 and RF1