From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proto-Samoyed
Proto-Samoyedic
Reconstruction of Samoyedic languages
Reconstructed
ancestor

Proto-Samoyedic, or Proto-Samoyed, is the reconstructed ancestral language of the Samoyedic languages: Nenets ( Tundra and Forest), Enets, Nganasan, Selkup, as well as extinct Kamas and Mator. Samoyedic is one of the principal branches of the Uralic language family, and its ancestor is Proto-Uralic. It has been suggested that Proto-Samoyedic greatly influenced the development of Tocharian, an Indo-European language. [1]

Phonology

A fairly complex system of vowel phonemes is reconstructed for Proto-Samoyedic:

Front Back
Unrounded Rounded Unrounded Rounded
Close i [i] ü [y] ï [ɯ] u [u]
Mid e [e] ö [ø] ë [ɤ] o [o]
Open ä [æ] a [ɑ] å [ɒ]
Reduced ə̈ [ə̟] ə [ə̠]

The system is retained relatively faithfully in Selkup (though expanded with vowel length). Two of the vowel contrasts are however only retained in Nganasan: the distinction of front and back reduced vowels, and that of *i versus *e. For the remainder of the family, following the mergers *e > *i and *ə̈ > *ə, a further shared change is raising of *ä > *e. [2] Earlier works often thus give a slightly different transcription of several vowels: [3]

Older reconstruction Current reconstruction
*i *i, *e
*e
*a

Even though the number of vowel phonemes was high, there were no long vowels or phonemic diphthongs. A peculiar feature of the reconstructed vowel system is the occurrence of vowel sequences, which consisted of any full vowel followed by the reduced vowel /ə/: for example, *tuə 'feather', *kåəså 'man'. These sequences were not diphthongs; the vowels belonged to separate syllables. Evidence of the vowel sequences has been preserved in only part of the Samoyedic languages, primarily in Nganasan and Enets. Wagner-Nagy (2004) [4] lists the following examples:

  • Close + reduced: *iə, *iə̈, *üə, *üə̈, *uə, *uə̈
  • Mid + reduced: *öə, *ëə, *oə, *oə̈
  • Open + reduced: *äə (> *eə), *åə
  • Close + open: *uå
  • Reduced + open: *əå

Proto-Samoyedic had vowel harmony like many other Uralic languages. Harmony determined whether a front vocalic or a back vocalic allomorph of a suffix was used. However, the restrictions imposed by vowel harmony were not absolute because also disharmonic word-stems can be reconstructed. Such stems break vowel harmony by combining front and back vowels: e.g. Proto-Samoyedic *kålä 'fish', *wäsa 'iron'.

In contrast to the vowel system, the consonant system is rather simple with only 13 phonemes:

labial dental palatal velar
stop p t k
affricate c [ts]
sibilant s
nasal m n ń [ɲ] ŋ
lateral l
trill r
semivowel w j

The exact sound value of the affricate is not entirely clear; it may originally have been retroflex [ʈ͡ʂ] rather than dental or alveolar [t͡s]. It has remained distinct only in Selkup, merging elsewhere with *t.

As in Proto-Uralic, the ancestor of Proto-Samoyedic, the first syllable of words was always stressed, and hence there was no contrastive stress. Contrastive tones did not occur either.

Phonotactics

As in Proto-Uralic, words could begin with a maximum of one consonant: initial consonant clusters were not allowed. Another phonotactic constraint inherited from Proto-Uralic was that the consonants *r and *ŋ were not allowed word-initially. Proto-Samoyedic had, however, innovated final consonant clusters in a few words. In all of them, the first consonant in the cluster was the semivowel *j, as in *wajŋ 'breath'. Thus, the syllable structure of Proto-Samoyedic was altogether (C)V(j)(C).

Inside words, clusters of two consonants were common. Clusters of three consonants were again possible only if the first consonant of the cluster was *j, as in *wajkkə 'neck'.

Later development

Palatalization of consonants, most prominently *k, has occurred in all recorded Samoyedic languages. This is however a post-Proto-Samoyedic development, as the details differ in each branch due to vowel developments. [5]

  • The Nenets-Enets group palatalizes both *k and *s to /sʲ/.
  • Nganasan, Selkup and Kamassian palatalize *k to a distinct /ʃ/. Nganasan also palatalizes *s to /sʲ/.
  • Mator appears to have no palatalization of *k; however, *s is, somewhat unusually, velarized to /k/.
  • Nenets-Enets and Nganasan have prominent palatalization of other consonants as well, leading to contraction of the vowel system.

Other widespread developments include prothesis of *ŋ, initial lenition of *p, and fortition of the semivowels *w, *j.

  • In Nganasan, Nenets and Enets, PS vowel-initial words gain an initial /ŋ/ via rhinoglottophilia (which may be subsequently palatalized to /nʲ/). This is occasionally found in other Samoyedic languages as well, usually with the exception of Mator.
  • PS initial *p is lenited to /f/ in Enets, /h/ in Mator and Nganasan. (/f/ still appears in the oldest Nganasan records.)
  • PS initial *w remains only in Nenets. In Selkup, it becomes /kʷ/; all other varieties shift it to /b/.
  • PS initial *j remains in both Nenets and Enets. It becomes /tʲ/ in Selkup, and /dʲ/ in other varieties.
  • In Mator and Kamassian, /b/, /dʲ/ are furthermore nasalized to /m/, /nʲ/ preceding a word-internal nasal. This has been an areal change, shared also with Siberian Turkic languages such as Khakas. [6]

Morphology

Proto-Samoyedic was a fairly typical agglutinative language with only little morphophonological alteration, apart from vowel harmony. In the following, -A marks an archiphoneme realized as in words with back-vocalic harmony, in words with front-vocalic harmony.

Three numbers were distinguished: singular, dual and plural. Possession was indicated with possessive suffixes.

Nouns distinguished seven cases:

Verbs were conjugated for mood, tense, number and person. There were also separate subjective and objective conjugations.

Derivational suffixes were numerous, and could form both verbs and nominals. [7]

Development

Most Proto-Samoyedic phonemes continue the corresponding Proto-Uralic phonemes unchanged. The most prominent changes are: [5] [8]

  • PU *s, š > PEU *θ > PS *t.
  • PU *ś > PS *s.
  • PU *δ > PS *r.
  • PU *δ́' as well as PU *l in most positions > PS *j. *l remains initially before PU *ï, [9] as well as in PS intervocalic positions.
  • PU *x > PS *ø, when before a consonant.
  • PU *u > PS *ø preceding a PU stem vowel *a.
  • PU *ï > PS *ë in PS closed syllables.
  • PU *ü > PS *i. PS *ü is of secondary origin.
  • PU stem-final *i is reduced to PS *ø̈/ø (per harmony), and if not preceded by an original consonant cluster, subsequently lost.
  • PU *a, o generally become PS *å, though in many cases PS *a also appears; the conditioning for this is not entirely clear.
  • PU stem-final *å becomes PS *ä after a lateral consonant (PU *l or *δ́; this points to an intermediate stage *ĺ in the development of the latter.)
  • PU *o remains in monosyllabic roots (both primary, and those resulting from loss of final *ø).
  • PU *k, *x, *w, *j are lost between vowels in roots of the shape *CVCi, yielding monosyllabic PS roots.
  • PU *k and preconsonantal *w are generally lost in medial consonant clusters.

Examples:

  • PU *äjmä "needle" > PS *äjmä
  • PU *kala "fish" > PS *kålä
  • PU *muna "egg" > PS *mønå
  • PU *weti "water" > PS *wet
  • PU *nüδi "handle" > PS *nir
  • PU *ïpti "hair" > PS *ëptø
  • PU *täwði "full" > PS *tärø̈
  • PU *mośki- "to wash" > PS *måsø-
  • PU *suksi "ski" > PS *tutø
  • PU *ńïxli "arrow" > PS *ńëøj
  • PU *käxli "tongue" > PS *käøj

Numerals

Proto-Samoyedic numerals with wider Uralic cognates are: [10]

  • *ketä ‘2’
  • *säjʔwǝ ‘7’
  • *wüt ‘10’ (cognate with Finno-Ugric numerals for ‘5’)

Innovative Proto-Samoyedic numerals with no apparent wider Uralic cognates: [10]

  • *nakur ‘3’
  • *tättǝ ‘4’
  • *sǝmpǝlaŋkǝ ‘5’
  • *mǝktut ‘6’

References

  1. ^ Peyrot, Michael (2019). "The deviant typological profile of the Tocharian branch of Indo-European may be due to Uralic substrate influence". Indo-European Linguistics. 7 (1): 72–121. doi: 10.1163/22125892-00701007. hdl: 1887/139205. S2CID  213924514.
  2. ^ Helimski, Eugen: The 13th Proto-Samoyedic vowel.[ permanent dead link] In: Mikola-konferencia 2004. Szeged: SzTE Department of Finnougristics, 2005. 27-39.
  3. ^ Aikio, Ante (2006). "New and Old Samoyed Etymologies (Part 2)". Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen (59): 10.
  4. ^ Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (2004). "Wort- und Silbenstruktur im Protosamojedischen". Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen (26–27): 87–108.
  5. ^ a b Sammallahti, Pekka (1988), "Historical phonology of the Uralic languages, with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric, and Permic", in Denis Sinor (ed.), The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Leiden: Brill, pp. 478–554
  6. ^ Helimski, Eugene (2003). "Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family: A survey" (PDF). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények: 158. ISSN  0029-6791. Retrieved 2014-10-31.
  7. ^ Janurik, Tamás (2010). "A közszamojéd szóanyag rekonstruálható képzői" (PDF). Folia Uralica Debreceniensia. 17. Retrieved 2015-03-23.
  8. ^ Aikio, Ante (2002), "New and Old Samoyed etymologies", Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 57, ISSN  0355-1253
  9. ^ Michalove, Peter A. (1999), "The treatment of initial *l- in Proto-Samoyed", Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 89, ISSN  0355-0214
  10. ^ a b Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Ante Aikio): Proto-Uralic. — To appear in: Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford University Press.

Janhunen, Juha 1998. Samoyedic. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, pp. 457–479. London / New York: Routledge.

Sources

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proto-Samoyed
Proto-Samoyedic
Reconstruction of Samoyedic languages
Reconstructed
ancestor

Proto-Samoyedic, or Proto-Samoyed, is the reconstructed ancestral language of the Samoyedic languages: Nenets ( Tundra and Forest), Enets, Nganasan, Selkup, as well as extinct Kamas and Mator. Samoyedic is one of the principal branches of the Uralic language family, and its ancestor is Proto-Uralic. It has been suggested that Proto-Samoyedic greatly influenced the development of Tocharian, an Indo-European language. [1]

Phonology

A fairly complex system of vowel phonemes is reconstructed for Proto-Samoyedic:

Front Back
Unrounded Rounded Unrounded Rounded
Close i [i] ü [y] ï [ɯ] u [u]
Mid e [e] ö [ø] ë [ɤ] o [o]
Open ä [æ] a [ɑ] å [ɒ]
Reduced ə̈ [ə̟] ə [ə̠]

The system is retained relatively faithfully in Selkup (though expanded with vowel length). Two of the vowel contrasts are however only retained in Nganasan: the distinction of front and back reduced vowels, and that of *i versus *e. For the remainder of the family, following the mergers *e > *i and *ə̈ > *ə, a further shared change is raising of *ä > *e. [2] Earlier works often thus give a slightly different transcription of several vowels: [3]

Older reconstruction Current reconstruction
*i *i, *e
*e
*a

Even though the number of vowel phonemes was high, there were no long vowels or phonemic diphthongs. A peculiar feature of the reconstructed vowel system is the occurrence of vowel sequences, which consisted of any full vowel followed by the reduced vowel /ə/: for example, *tuə 'feather', *kåəså 'man'. These sequences were not diphthongs; the vowels belonged to separate syllables. Evidence of the vowel sequences has been preserved in only part of the Samoyedic languages, primarily in Nganasan and Enets. Wagner-Nagy (2004) [4] lists the following examples:

  • Close + reduced: *iə, *iə̈, *üə, *üə̈, *uə, *uə̈
  • Mid + reduced: *öə, *ëə, *oə, *oə̈
  • Open + reduced: *äə (> *eə), *åə
  • Close + open: *uå
  • Reduced + open: *əå

Proto-Samoyedic had vowel harmony like many other Uralic languages. Harmony determined whether a front vocalic or a back vocalic allomorph of a suffix was used. However, the restrictions imposed by vowel harmony were not absolute because also disharmonic word-stems can be reconstructed. Such stems break vowel harmony by combining front and back vowels: e.g. Proto-Samoyedic *kålä 'fish', *wäsa 'iron'.

In contrast to the vowel system, the consonant system is rather simple with only 13 phonemes:

labial dental palatal velar
stop p t k
affricate c [ts]
sibilant s
nasal m n ń [ɲ] ŋ
lateral l
trill r
semivowel w j

The exact sound value of the affricate is not entirely clear; it may originally have been retroflex [ʈ͡ʂ] rather than dental or alveolar [t͡s]. It has remained distinct only in Selkup, merging elsewhere with *t.

As in Proto-Uralic, the ancestor of Proto-Samoyedic, the first syllable of words was always stressed, and hence there was no contrastive stress. Contrastive tones did not occur either.

Phonotactics

As in Proto-Uralic, words could begin with a maximum of one consonant: initial consonant clusters were not allowed. Another phonotactic constraint inherited from Proto-Uralic was that the consonants *r and *ŋ were not allowed word-initially. Proto-Samoyedic had, however, innovated final consonant clusters in a few words. In all of them, the first consonant in the cluster was the semivowel *j, as in *wajŋ 'breath'. Thus, the syllable structure of Proto-Samoyedic was altogether (C)V(j)(C).

Inside words, clusters of two consonants were common. Clusters of three consonants were again possible only if the first consonant of the cluster was *j, as in *wajkkə 'neck'.

Later development

Palatalization of consonants, most prominently *k, has occurred in all recorded Samoyedic languages. This is however a post-Proto-Samoyedic development, as the details differ in each branch due to vowel developments. [5]

  • The Nenets-Enets group palatalizes both *k and *s to /sʲ/.
  • Nganasan, Selkup and Kamassian palatalize *k to a distinct /ʃ/. Nganasan also palatalizes *s to /sʲ/.
  • Mator appears to have no palatalization of *k; however, *s is, somewhat unusually, velarized to /k/.
  • Nenets-Enets and Nganasan have prominent palatalization of other consonants as well, leading to contraction of the vowel system.

Other widespread developments include prothesis of *ŋ, initial lenition of *p, and fortition of the semivowels *w, *j.

  • In Nganasan, Nenets and Enets, PS vowel-initial words gain an initial /ŋ/ via rhinoglottophilia (which may be subsequently palatalized to /nʲ/). This is occasionally found in other Samoyedic languages as well, usually with the exception of Mator.
  • PS initial *p is lenited to /f/ in Enets, /h/ in Mator and Nganasan. (/f/ still appears in the oldest Nganasan records.)
  • PS initial *w remains only in Nenets. In Selkup, it becomes /kʷ/; all other varieties shift it to /b/.
  • PS initial *j remains in both Nenets and Enets. It becomes /tʲ/ in Selkup, and /dʲ/ in other varieties.
  • In Mator and Kamassian, /b/, /dʲ/ are furthermore nasalized to /m/, /nʲ/ preceding a word-internal nasal. This has been an areal change, shared also with Siberian Turkic languages such as Khakas. [6]

Morphology

Proto-Samoyedic was a fairly typical agglutinative language with only little morphophonological alteration, apart from vowel harmony. In the following, -A marks an archiphoneme realized as in words with back-vocalic harmony, in words with front-vocalic harmony.

Three numbers were distinguished: singular, dual and plural. Possession was indicated with possessive suffixes.

Nouns distinguished seven cases:

Verbs were conjugated for mood, tense, number and person. There were also separate subjective and objective conjugations.

Derivational suffixes were numerous, and could form both verbs and nominals. [7]

Development

Most Proto-Samoyedic phonemes continue the corresponding Proto-Uralic phonemes unchanged. The most prominent changes are: [5] [8]

  • PU *s, š > PEU *θ > PS *t.
  • PU *ś > PS *s.
  • PU *δ > PS *r.
  • PU *δ́' as well as PU *l in most positions > PS *j. *l remains initially before PU *ï, [9] as well as in PS intervocalic positions.
  • PU *x > PS *ø, when before a consonant.
  • PU *u > PS *ø preceding a PU stem vowel *a.
  • PU *ï > PS *ë in PS closed syllables.
  • PU *ü > PS *i. PS *ü is of secondary origin.
  • PU stem-final *i is reduced to PS *ø̈/ø (per harmony), and if not preceded by an original consonant cluster, subsequently lost.
  • PU *a, o generally become PS *å, though in many cases PS *a also appears; the conditioning for this is not entirely clear.
  • PU stem-final *å becomes PS *ä after a lateral consonant (PU *l or *δ́; this points to an intermediate stage *ĺ in the development of the latter.)
  • PU *o remains in monosyllabic roots (both primary, and those resulting from loss of final *ø).
  • PU *k, *x, *w, *j are lost between vowels in roots of the shape *CVCi, yielding monosyllabic PS roots.
  • PU *k and preconsonantal *w are generally lost in medial consonant clusters.

Examples:

  • PU *äjmä "needle" > PS *äjmä
  • PU *kala "fish" > PS *kålä
  • PU *muna "egg" > PS *mønå
  • PU *weti "water" > PS *wet
  • PU *nüδi "handle" > PS *nir
  • PU *ïpti "hair" > PS *ëptø
  • PU *täwði "full" > PS *tärø̈
  • PU *mośki- "to wash" > PS *måsø-
  • PU *suksi "ski" > PS *tutø
  • PU *ńïxli "arrow" > PS *ńëøj
  • PU *käxli "tongue" > PS *käøj

Numerals

Proto-Samoyedic numerals with wider Uralic cognates are: [10]

  • *ketä ‘2’
  • *säjʔwǝ ‘7’
  • *wüt ‘10’ (cognate with Finno-Ugric numerals for ‘5’)

Innovative Proto-Samoyedic numerals with no apparent wider Uralic cognates: [10]

  • *nakur ‘3’
  • *tättǝ ‘4’
  • *sǝmpǝlaŋkǝ ‘5’
  • *mǝktut ‘6’

References

  1. ^ Peyrot, Michael (2019). "The deviant typological profile of the Tocharian branch of Indo-European may be due to Uralic substrate influence". Indo-European Linguistics. 7 (1): 72–121. doi: 10.1163/22125892-00701007. hdl: 1887/139205. S2CID  213924514.
  2. ^ Helimski, Eugen: The 13th Proto-Samoyedic vowel.[ permanent dead link] In: Mikola-konferencia 2004. Szeged: SzTE Department of Finnougristics, 2005. 27-39.
  3. ^ Aikio, Ante (2006). "New and Old Samoyed Etymologies (Part 2)". Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen (59): 10.
  4. ^ Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (2004). "Wort- und Silbenstruktur im Protosamojedischen". Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen (26–27): 87–108.
  5. ^ a b Sammallahti, Pekka (1988), "Historical phonology of the Uralic languages, with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric, and Permic", in Denis Sinor (ed.), The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Leiden: Brill, pp. 478–554
  6. ^ Helimski, Eugene (2003). "Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family: A survey" (PDF). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények: 158. ISSN  0029-6791. Retrieved 2014-10-31.
  7. ^ Janurik, Tamás (2010). "A közszamojéd szóanyag rekonstruálható képzői" (PDF). Folia Uralica Debreceniensia. 17. Retrieved 2015-03-23.
  8. ^ Aikio, Ante (2002), "New and Old Samoyed etymologies", Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 57, ISSN  0355-1253
  9. ^ Michalove, Peter A. (1999), "The treatment of initial *l- in Proto-Samoyed", Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 89, ISSN  0355-0214
  10. ^ a b Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Ante Aikio): Proto-Uralic. — To appear in: Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford University Press.

Janhunen, Juha 1998. Samoyedic. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, pp. 457–479. London / New York: Routledge.

Sources


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook