This
interface message or
skin may be documented on
MediaWiki.org or
translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors. To request a change to the page, add {{ edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion. |
Quite a long sentence! =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
The recent changes to this message broke it. See for example Test page. Please revert them. Thanks – Gurch 09:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Have a look at User:SunStar Net/A Test Protected Title - this is a proposed new version I have made. Feel free to edit it as you want, I feel the new softer colour looks better. -- SunStar Net talk 15:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Sometimes, a page is blocked from creation because of an AFD consensus. The problem is the link only refers to the first nomination. Is there a way to make it link to subsequest ones or do we have to use the old {{ deletedpage}} tag? Even so, we still would need to tweak that template. I cannot do it because I am not an admin (yet). -- VoltronForce 01:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Strictly speaking, this isn't an article template... but it seems to me it would be reasonable to make it match the new standard article space template style... no?
I've got an edited copy in User:Coren/Cascadeprotected. I resisted the temptation to add icons since the original messages did not have any. :-) — Coren (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
{{ sudo}}
Does the cascade-protected message really need to be in red text and bold? Being cascade-protected is no more severe a situation than if the page is fully protected normally, and the protected page message isn't all bold and red. Since this message is distinct from the normal protected page message, it should also have a different id
attribute. Some explanatory links would also be nice.
How about changing this part of the message:
<span style="color: red; background-color: white;" id="protectedpagewarning"><strong>This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following {{PLURAL:$1|page, which is|pages, which are}} protected with the "cascading" option enabled:</strong></span>
to this:
<span id="mw-cascadeprotectedtext">'''This page is currently [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|protected]] from editing''' because it is [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] in the following {{PLURAL:$1|page, which is|pages, which are}} protected with the "[[Wikipedia:Cascading protection|cascading]]" option enabled:</span>
which would replace this:
This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the "cascading" option enabled:
with this:
This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the " cascading" option enabled:
More useful and much easier on the eye, I think. Thanks – 81.153.158.137 11:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I've made the requested changes. This message is only viewed by non-admin users (admins see MediaWiki:Cascadeprotectedwarning), so the whole consistency argument doesn't make sense. --- RockMFR 19:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can something be added to this message about using {{ editprotected}} by non-administrators to request that an edit be made to it, such as:
jfd34 ( talk) 09:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add {{ Submit an edit request|type=full}} to this page to make it easier to request edits to cascade protected pages. Thank you Technical 13 ( talk) 20:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This page is currently
protected from editing because it is
transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the "
cascading" option:
$2 |
{{PROTECTIONLEVEL}}
, though. Let me try and work something out. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 05:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)@
Technical 13 and
Jackmcbarn: Ok, I have finished my coding, which you can see in
this revision of my sandbox. This has involved making
Template:Protected page text so that I could reuse code both in this message and at
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext. I've attached a couple of examples of what it will look like. (Note that both of these use mbox for the message box with the padlock icon, so they will be coloured differently in different namespaces.)
Let me know what you think, and if all looks well I will put it up live. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
{{PROTECTIONLEVEL}}
magic word, but there is no magic word that can detect cascading protection, so we can't do it the other way round. We could disable the cascadeprotected warning entirely if there's also a protectedpagetext warning, but this would mean that users would be given no hints about why they can't edit the page, if, for example, the page is both semi-protected and cascade-protected. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 06:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the contents of the page with the following:
Why is the page protected?
What can I do?
|
This causes the full message to always be displayed, even if regular protection is also present. This should be changed before the change at MediaWiki talk:Protectedpagetext#Protected edit request on 2 January 2014 is made. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 21:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the contents of this page with the following:
Why is the page protected?
What can I do?
|
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 20:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Jackmcbarn is this just a request to change the background color? — xaosflux Talk 00:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the protection file. File:Padlock-turquoise.svg. Not an full protected logo 38.96.9.224 ( talk) 04:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Protected page text has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the color of the lock to turquoise because that is how cascade protection is described on Wikipedia's protection policy. Ups and Downs ( ↕) 00:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
| image = Padlock-turquoise.svg
to the template {{
protected page text}}.
Ups and
Downs (
↕) 07:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since the policy currently uses the turquoise padlock icon for cascade-protected pages, then this message should REALLY use the Turquoise Padlock icon. 2602:306:379D:1AA0:8D09:90B5:D1A8:555 ( talk) 05:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the line:
| image = Padlock-turquoise.svg
to:
| image = Cascade-protection-shackle.svg
Per this RfC. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 02:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
If that exists, the code of this needs to account for it. I ran into this at Template:0 which is template-editor protected, but which is showing up incorrectly in Category:Wikipedia fully-protected templates and also (when you edit it or try to edit it) it auto-reports that it's only editable by administrators due to cascading but it can in fact be edited by template-editors like myself. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Are there any category pages that list all cascade-protected pages? I know that it exists for autoconfirmed, extended-confirmed, template, and full protection, so is there a list of all cascade-protected pages? The only one I know of as of now is the Main Page. Thank you! 2003 LN 6 17:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This
interface message or
skin may be documented on
MediaWiki.org or
translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors. To request a change to the page, add {{ edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion. |
Quite a long sentence! =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
The recent changes to this message broke it. See for example Test page. Please revert them. Thanks – Gurch 09:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Have a look at User:SunStar Net/A Test Protected Title - this is a proposed new version I have made. Feel free to edit it as you want, I feel the new softer colour looks better. -- SunStar Net talk 15:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Sometimes, a page is blocked from creation because of an AFD consensus. The problem is the link only refers to the first nomination. Is there a way to make it link to subsequest ones or do we have to use the old {{ deletedpage}} tag? Even so, we still would need to tweak that template. I cannot do it because I am not an admin (yet). -- VoltronForce 01:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Strictly speaking, this isn't an article template... but it seems to me it would be reasonable to make it match the new standard article space template style... no?
I've got an edited copy in User:Coren/Cascadeprotected. I resisted the temptation to add icons since the original messages did not have any. :-) — Coren (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
{{ sudo}}
Does the cascade-protected message really need to be in red text and bold? Being cascade-protected is no more severe a situation than if the page is fully protected normally, and the protected page message isn't all bold and red. Since this message is distinct from the normal protected page message, it should also have a different id
attribute. Some explanatory links would also be nice.
How about changing this part of the message:
<span style="color: red; background-color: white;" id="protectedpagewarning"><strong>This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following {{PLURAL:$1|page, which is|pages, which are}} protected with the "cascading" option enabled:</strong></span>
to this:
<span id="mw-cascadeprotectedtext">'''This page is currently [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|protected]] from editing''' because it is [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] in the following {{PLURAL:$1|page, which is|pages, which are}} protected with the "[[Wikipedia:Cascading protection|cascading]]" option enabled:</span>
which would replace this:
This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the "cascading" option enabled:
with this:
This page is currently protected from editing because it is transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the " cascading" option enabled:
More useful and much easier on the eye, I think. Thanks – 81.153.158.137 11:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I've made the requested changes. This message is only viewed by non-admin users (admins see MediaWiki:Cascadeprotectedwarning), so the whole consistency argument doesn't make sense. --- RockMFR 19:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can something be added to this message about using {{ editprotected}} by non-administrators to request that an edit be made to it, such as:
jfd34 ( talk) 09:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add {{ Submit an edit request|type=full}} to this page to make it easier to request edits to cascade protected pages. Thank you Technical 13 ( talk) 20:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This page is currently
protected from editing because it is
transcluded in the following pages, which are protected with the "
cascading" option:
$2 |
{{PROTECTIONLEVEL}}
, though. Let me try and work something out. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 05:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)@
Technical 13 and
Jackmcbarn: Ok, I have finished my coding, which you can see in
this revision of my sandbox. This has involved making
Template:Protected page text so that I could reuse code both in this message and at
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext. I've attached a couple of examples of what it will look like. (Note that both of these use mbox for the message box with the padlock icon, so they will be coloured differently in different namespaces.)
Let me know what you think, and if all looks well I will put it up live. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
{{PROTECTIONLEVEL}}
magic word, but there is no magic word that can detect cascading protection, so we can't do it the other way round. We could disable the cascadeprotected warning entirely if there's also a protectedpagetext warning, but this would mean that users would be given no hints about why they can't edit the page, if, for example, the page is both semi-protected and cascade-protected. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 06:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the contents of the page with the following:
Why is the page protected?
What can I do?
|
This causes the full message to always be displayed, even if regular protection is also present. This should be changed before the change at MediaWiki talk:Protectedpagetext#Protected edit request on 2 January 2014 is made. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 21:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the contents of this page with the following:
Why is the page protected?
What can I do?
|
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 20:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Jackmcbarn is this just a request to change the background color? — xaosflux Talk 00:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the protection file. File:Padlock-turquoise.svg. Not an full protected logo 38.96.9.224 ( talk) 04:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Protected page text has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the color of the lock to turquoise because that is how cascade protection is described on Wikipedia's protection policy. Ups and Downs ( ↕) 00:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
| image = Padlock-turquoise.svg
to the template {{
protected page text}}.
Ups and
Downs (
↕) 07:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since the policy currently uses the turquoise padlock icon for cascade-protected pages, then this message should REALLY use the Turquoise Padlock icon. 2602:306:379D:1AA0:8D09:90B5:D1A8:555 ( talk) 05:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the line:
| image = Padlock-turquoise.svg
to:
| image = Cascade-protection-shackle.svg
Per this RfC. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 02:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
If that exists, the code of this needs to account for it. I ran into this at Template:0 which is template-editor protected, but which is showing up incorrectly in Category:Wikipedia fully-protected templates and also (when you edit it or try to edit it) it auto-reports that it's only editable by administrators due to cascading but it can in fact be edited by template-editors like myself. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Are there any category pages that list all cascade-protected pages? I know that it exists for autoconfirmed, extended-confirmed, template, and full protection, so is there a list of all cascade-protected pages? The only one I know of as of now is the Main Page. Thank you! 2003 LN 6 17:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)