This is a list of genera in the plant family
Araceae. As currently circumscribed, the family contains over 3700 species into approximately a hundred genera. The family's taxonomy remains in flux, and a full taxonomic treatment integrating the mass of phylogenetic data that has become available in the last 10 years remain to be produced. The classification presented here is informed by the review of Mayo et al. (2013).[1]
^A second date given in parentheses indicate the printed date on the work, when that date differs from the actual date of publication. This may occur because the work was distributed at a different date, or because a book was printed in multiple issues bound together at a later date.
^Although Schott's original publication used both Lysichiton and Lysichitum his later publications used only the former name.
^Since Barton himself credits Nuttall in following Salisbury's (1812, Trans. Hortic. Soc. Lond.1:267) invalid name, some attribute authorship to that author instead (either in Barton or in Gen. N. Amer. Pl.1:105, 1818)
^Although Schleiden originally published the genus in an earlier version[6] of that paper, he originally only included one species, W. delilei (≡ Wolffiella hyalina (Delile) Monod). That species was later moved out of Wolffia and into Wolffiella, overlooking that it was already the type of the former name. By the time the problem was noticed in the mid-20th century, Wolffia would have replaced Wolffiella, and the former Wolffia would have had to become Grantia (den Hartog, 1969, Taxon18(5):591-592), which would have resulted in "intolerable confusion" (McVaugh, 1971, Taxon20(2-3):384-389) as most of the species of the then Lemnaceae changed genera (two of which similar in name), and so the name was conserved (McVaugh, 1971) with a later date of publication allowing for a valid lectotype to be chosen.[6]
^Schleiden's species is an illegitimate renaming of
Linnaeus' Lemna arrhiza and is properly called Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Horkel ex
Wimm.
^Although Adanson originally called the species Dracontium pertusum, the combination Monstera pertusa was assigned by Schott (1830, Wiener Z. Kunst4:1028), the first author to accept Adanson's genus and create combinations in it, to Pothos pertusumRoxb. (currently known as Rhaphidophora pertusa (Roxb.)
Schott).
^Some sources cite Gen. Aroid.:pl. 83 (1858), but there is no reason to believe that the May issue of Bonplandia, which Schott himself cite as the place of publication in Genera Aroidearum Exposita was published with that much delay.
^The species, which is an illegitimate renaming of Loddiges' Calladium zamiifolium, is correctly known as Zamioculcas zamiifolia (
G.Lodd.) Schott.
^The correct name is Aglaonema nitida (
Jack)
Kunth. Schott's original type species may have been meant to be a renaming of
William Roxburgh's Calla oblongifolia (=Aglaonema marantifoliaBlume), but Schott mistakenly cited only
Heinrich Friedrich Link's Arum integrifolium as a synonym, rendering the type species' new name illegitimate; he would later (1832, Melet. Bot.1:20) rename it Aglaonema integrifolium. (Nicolson, 1969, Smithsonian Contr. Bot.1:5)
^The species' name is illegitimate as it is based on the same type as Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (
Dennst.) Nicolson, which is the correct name.
^If the designation by Pfeiffer (1872, Nomencl. Bot.1:265) is valid, the type is Arisaema speciosum, otherwise, the designation by Britton and Brown (1913, Ill. Fl. N.U.S., ed. 2. 1:442) of
A. nepenthoideshas priority.
^Although the original description included only this species, which is listed as type in Index Nominum Genericorum, the name is not included in any standard databases for unknown reasons.
^This number does not account for many more species that remain undescribed or untransferred from original placement in the discredited Microcasia (Boyce & Yeng 2013; Webbia67(2):139-146).
^This species was until recently placed in its own subfamily, which was found (Cabrera et al. 2008; Am. J. Bot.95(9)1153-1165:1160) to be nested within Aroideae. A new, comprehensive taxonomy of the family remains to be published, but Cabrera and al. characterized the demoting of the subfamily back to tribal status as the most sensible option.
^A first part comprising 10 pages and 6 plates was issued in quarto format in 1803, but this edition was abandoned, and the more common folio edition began publication 2 years later.
^IPNI and ING gives a part of Schott's Aroideae issued in 1855 as the place of publication, but the premier monograph gives the 1856 publication, which is the only one that could be verified.
^Schott originally published the genus the year before(Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl.7:85) as Hapale, but then chose to alter the name as it was homonymous with a now disused genus of
marmosets. This new name was later conserved (Brummitt 1984; Taxon33(4):707) over the original form.
^Multiple sources give the year of publication as 1853 (Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl.3:369), but Schott merely notes after describing his Dracunculus crinita that "a genus Helicodiceros will probably be justified" ("Eine Gattung «Helicodiceros» dürfte hierdurch begründet werden."), which fails to satisfy the requirement of the
ICN's article 36.1 (see also Rickett and Stafleu, 1959, Taxon8(7):231).
^Due to confusion with a later, similarly titled work by Zollinger which has the same standardised abbreviation, some sources erroneously give 1854 as the date of publication.
^Properly attributed to Brongniart in Schott (who says he is quoting Brongniart's description from a letter without adding any details of his own: "Wir bringen nachstehend den uns vom Autor überlassenen Gattungskarakter dar, indem wir uns nicht erlauben, demselben Eigenes anzufügen."), not Brongniart ex Schott, and not cited to Gen. Aroid.:pl. 65 (1858).
^Mayo, Simon J.; Bogner, Josef; Cusimano, Nathalie (2013). "Recent Progress in the Phylogenetics and Classification of the Araceae". In Paul Wilkin and Simon J. Mayo (ed.). Early Events in Monocot Evolution. Systematics Association Special Volume Series. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208–242.
ISBN978-1-107-01276-9.
^Schott (1857).
"Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (8): 61–62.
doi:
10.1007/BF02059440.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-17. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hegelmaier, F. (1896).
"Systematische Übersicht der Lemnaceen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 21 (3): 268–305, 303.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
^
abcdefSchott, H.W. (1829). "Für Liebhaber der Botanik" [For Botanical Amateurs]. Wiener Zeitschrift für Kunst, Litteratur, Theater und Mode (in German). 1829 (3): 732, 779–780, 803, 828, 892, 1180, 1280.
^
abSchott, H. (1857).
"Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (9): 69–70.
doi:
10.1007/BF02059776.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Beccari, Odoardo (1877).
"Aracee Della Malesia e Della Papuasia Raccolte Da 0. Beccari". Malesia: raccolta di osservazioni botaniche intorno alie piante dell'arcipelago indo-malese e papuano publicata da Odoardo Beccari. Vol. 1. Genova: Instituto Sordo-Muti. p. 265.
^Adanson, M. (1763).
Familles des plantes. Vol. 2. Paris: Vincent. p. 460.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-11-02.
^Griffith, William (1851).
"Monocotyledonous Plants". In John McClelland (ed.). Notulæ ad Plantas Asiaticas. Vol. 3. p. 149.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-10-08.
^Schott, Heinrich (1857). Aroideae Maximilianae. Carl Gerold & sons. p. 3.
^de Candolle, Alphonse; de Candolle, Casimir (1879).
Monographiae Phanerogamarum. Vol. 2. Paris: G. Masson. p. 208.
Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
^
abcSchott, H. (1856). Synopsis Aroidearum complectens enumerationem systematicam generum et specierum hujus ordinis (in Latin). Vienna=: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae.
^Decaisne, J. (1834).
"Description d'un herbier de l'ile de Timor" [Description of an herbarium from Timor Island]. Nouvelles Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle (in French). 3: 333–501, 366.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1853).
"Eine Aroidee". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 3 (40): 313–314.
doi:
10.1007/BF02056581.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (50): 398–399.
doi:
10.1007/BF02071618.
Archived from the original on 2019-08-15. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1858). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 8 (10): 317–318.
doi:
10.1007/BF02106032.
^Ridley, H.N. (1913).
"Some Bornean Aroideae". Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 51: 201–202.
Archived from the original on 2019-07-28. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^
abMiller, Phillip (1754).
The gardeners dictionary (4th abr. ed.). London: John and James Rivington.
(Because the pagination in the original work, when present at all, can be best described as idiosyncratic, only links are given here. A
facsimile edition with continuous pagination exists.)
^Jumelle, Henri (1928).
"Un Nouveau Genre malgache d'Aracées" [A new Madagascan genus of Araceae]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 4 (in French). 6 (2): 21–24.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Fischer, F.E.L.; Meyer, C.A. (1845).
"Asterostigma, eine neue Pflanzengattung aus Brasilien" [Asterostigma, a new plant genus from Brazil]. Bulletin de la Classe Physico-Mathématique de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg (in German). 3 (10–11): 148–149.
^Nicolson, Dan H. (1984). "Suprageneric Names Attributable to Araceae". Taxon. 33 (4): 680–690, 690.
doi:
10.2307/1220785.
JSTOR1220785.
^Ventenat, Et.P. (1800).
"Dissertation sur le genre Arum". Magasin Encyclopédique (in French). 4: 461–472.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2013-08-03.
^Urban, I. (1895).
"Diagnosen neuer Arten und kleinere Mitteilungen" [Diagnoses of new species and minor communications]. Notizblatt des Königlichen botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin (in German). 1 (1): 18–32, 27.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Jumelle, Henri (1919).
"Les Aracées de Madagascar" [The Araceae of Madagascar]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 3 (in French). 7 (2): 179–189, 187.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (52): 414–415.
doi:
10.1007/BF02073220.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-23. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Appendix generum et specierum novarum et minus cognitarum, quae in horto regio botanico Berolinensi coluntur. Berlin: C. Feisteri. 1855. p. 2.
^Bunting, George S. (1975). "Nuevas Especies para la Revision de las Araceas Venezolanas" [New species for the revision of Venezuelan Araceae]. Acta Botánica Venezuélica. 10 (1/4): 263–335, 264.
JSTOR41740660.
^Dalzell, N.A. (1852).
"Contributions to the Botany of Western India". Hooker's Journal of Botany and Kew Garden Miscellany. 4: 107–114, 289–295, 341–347, 289.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2013-09-13.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (51): 406–407.
doi:
10.1007/BF02071943.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (54): 421–422.
doi:
10.1007/BF02230209.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hotta, M. (1965). "Notes on Schismatoglottidinae of Borneo. I.". Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imperial University, Series B. 32 (1): 19–30, 29.
^Tenore, Michele (1839). "Della Pinellia nuovo genere nella famiglia delle Aroidee; memoria". Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, Sezione della Società Reale Borbonica. 4: 57–71.
^"New Garden Plants". The Gardeners' Chronicle. New Series. 11 (1): 138. 1879.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Engler, A. (1893).
"Araceae Africanae". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 15 (4): 447–466, 455.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H.G. (1860).
Prodromus systematis Aroidearum. Vienna: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae. p. 214.
Archived from the original on 2016-08-22. Retrieved 2013-09-19.
^Schott, H. (1859).
"Aroideenskizzen". Bonplandia (in German). 7 (11): 163–165.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-22. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hooker, J. (1831).
"Spathicarpa hastifolia". Botanical Miscellany. 2: 146–148.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-18. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Koch, C. (1862). "Steudnera colocasiaefolia, Eine neue Aroidee". Wochenscrift des Vereines zur Befördung des Gärtenbaues in den Königl. Preussischen Staaten für Gärtnerei und Pflanzenkunde (in German). 5: 114–116.
^Engler, A. (1883).
"Beiträge zur Kentniss der Aracee" [Contributions to the knowledge of the Aracee]. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 4: 59–66.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-22. Retrieved 2013-09-26.
^Engler, A. (1906).
"Ulearum Engl. nov. gen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 37 (1): 95–96.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
This is a list of genera in the plant family
Araceae. As currently circumscribed, the family contains over 3700 species into approximately a hundred genera. The family's taxonomy remains in flux, and a full taxonomic treatment integrating the mass of phylogenetic data that has become available in the last 10 years remain to be produced. The classification presented here is informed by the review of Mayo et al. (2013).[1]
^A second date given in parentheses indicate the printed date on the work, when that date differs from the actual date of publication. This may occur because the work was distributed at a different date, or because a book was printed in multiple issues bound together at a later date.
^Although Schott's original publication used both Lysichiton and Lysichitum his later publications used only the former name.
^Since Barton himself credits Nuttall in following Salisbury's (1812, Trans. Hortic. Soc. Lond.1:267) invalid name, some attribute authorship to that author instead (either in Barton or in Gen. N. Amer. Pl.1:105, 1818)
^Although Schleiden originally published the genus in an earlier version[6] of that paper, he originally only included one species, W. delilei (≡ Wolffiella hyalina (Delile) Monod). That species was later moved out of Wolffia and into Wolffiella, overlooking that it was already the type of the former name. By the time the problem was noticed in the mid-20th century, Wolffia would have replaced Wolffiella, and the former Wolffia would have had to become Grantia (den Hartog, 1969, Taxon18(5):591-592), which would have resulted in "intolerable confusion" (McVaugh, 1971, Taxon20(2-3):384-389) as most of the species of the then Lemnaceae changed genera (two of which similar in name), and so the name was conserved (McVaugh, 1971) with a later date of publication allowing for a valid lectotype to be chosen.[6]
^Schleiden's species is an illegitimate renaming of
Linnaeus' Lemna arrhiza and is properly called Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Horkel ex
Wimm.
^Although Adanson originally called the species Dracontium pertusum, the combination Monstera pertusa was assigned by Schott (1830, Wiener Z. Kunst4:1028), the first author to accept Adanson's genus and create combinations in it, to Pothos pertusumRoxb. (currently known as Rhaphidophora pertusa (Roxb.)
Schott).
^Some sources cite Gen. Aroid.:pl. 83 (1858), but there is no reason to believe that the May issue of Bonplandia, which Schott himself cite as the place of publication in Genera Aroidearum Exposita was published with that much delay.
^The species, which is an illegitimate renaming of Loddiges' Calladium zamiifolium, is correctly known as Zamioculcas zamiifolia (
G.Lodd.) Schott.
^The correct name is Aglaonema nitida (
Jack)
Kunth. Schott's original type species may have been meant to be a renaming of
William Roxburgh's Calla oblongifolia (=Aglaonema marantifoliaBlume), but Schott mistakenly cited only
Heinrich Friedrich Link's Arum integrifolium as a synonym, rendering the type species' new name illegitimate; he would later (1832, Melet. Bot.1:20) rename it Aglaonema integrifolium. (Nicolson, 1969, Smithsonian Contr. Bot.1:5)
^The species' name is illegitimate as it is based on the same type as Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (
Dennst.) Nicolson, which is the correct name.
^If the designation by Pfeiffer (1872, Nomencl. Bot.1:265) is valid, the type is Arisaema speciosum, otherwise, the designation by Britton and Brown (1913, Ill. Fl. N.U.S., ed. 2. 1:442) of
A. nepenthoideshas priority.
^Although the original description included only this species, which is listed as type in Index Nominum Genericorum, the name is not included in any standard databases for unknown reasons.
^This number does not account for many more species that remain undescribed or untransferred from original placement in the discredited Microcasia (Boyce & Yeng 2013; Webbia67(2):139-146).
^This species was until recently placed in its own subfamily, which was found (Cabrera et al. 2008; Am. J. Bot.95(9)1153-1165:1160) to be nested within Aroideae. A new, comprehensive taxonomy of the family remains to be published, but Cabrera and al. characterized the demoting of the subfamily back to tribal status as the most sensible option.
^A first part comprising 10 pages and 6 plates was issued in quarto format in 1803, but this edition was abandoned, and the more common folio edition began publication 2 years later.
^IPNI and ING gives a part of Schott's Aroideae issued in 1855 as the place of publication, but the premier monograph gives the 1856 publication, which is the only one that could be verified.
^Schott originally published the genus the year before(Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl.7:85) as Hapale, but then chose to alter the name as it was homonymous with a now disused genus of
marmosets. This new name was later conserved (Brummitt 1984; Taxon33(4):707) over the original form.
^Multiple sources give the year of publication as 1853 (Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl.3:369), but Schott merely notes after describing his Dracunculus crinita that "a genus Helicodiceros will probably be justified" ("Eine Gattung «Helicodiceros» dürfte hierdurch begründet werden."), which fails to satisfy the requirement of the
ICN's article 36.1 (see also Rickett and Stafleu, 1959, Taxon8(7):231).
^Due to confusion with a later, similarly titled work by Zollinger which has the same standardised abbreviation, some sources erroneously give 1854 as the date of publication.
^Properly attributed to Brongniart in Schott (who says he is quoting Brongniart's description from a letter without adding any details of his own: "Wir bringen nachstehend den uns vom Autor überlassenen Gattungskarakter dar, indem wir uns nicht erlauben, demselben Eigenes anzufügen."), not Brongniart ex Schott, and not cited to Gen. Aroid.:pl. 65 (1858).
^Mayo, Simon J.; Bogner, Josef; Cusimano, Nathalie (2013). "Recent Progress in the Phylogenetics and Classification of the Araceae". In Paul Wilkin and Simon J. Mayo (ed.). Early Events in Monocot Evolution. Systematics Association Special Volume Series. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208–242.
ISBN978-1-107-01276-9.
^Schott (1857).
"Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (8): 61–62.
doi:
10.1007/BF02059440.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-17. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hegelmaier, F. (1896).
"Systematische Übersicht der Lemnaceen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 21 (3): 268–305, 303.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
^
abcdefSchott, H.W. (1829). "Für Liebhaber der Botanik" [For Botanical Amateurs]. Wiener Zeitschrift für Kunst, Litteratur, Theater und Mode (in German). 1829 (3): 732, 779–780, 803, 828, 892, 1180, 1280.
^
abSchott, H. (1857).
"Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (9): 69–70.
doi:
10.1007/BF02059776.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Beccari, Odoardo (1877).
"Aracee Della Malesia e Della Papuasia Raccolte Da 0. Beccari". Malesia: raccolta di osservazioni botaniche intorno alie piante dell'arcipelago indo-malese e papuano publicata da Odoardo Beccari. Vol. 1. Genova: Instituto Sordo-Muti. p. 265.
^Adanson, M. (1763).
Familles des plantes. Vol. 2. Paris: Vincent. p. 460.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-11-02.
^Griffith, William (1851).
"Monocotyledonous Plants". In John McClelland (ed.). Notulæ ad Plantas Asiaticas. Vol. 3. p. 149.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-10-08.
^Schott, Heinrich (1857). Aroideae Maximilianae. Carl Gerold & sons. p. 3.
^de Candolle, Alphonse; de Candolle, Casimir (1879).
Monographiae Phanerogamarum. Vol. 2. Paris: G. Masson. p. 208.
Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
^
abcSchott, H. (1856). Synopsis Aroidearum complectens enumerationem systematicam generum et specierum hujus ordinis (in Latin). Vienna=: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae.
^Decaisne, J. (1834).
"Description d'un herbier de l'ile de Timor" [Description of an herbarium from Timor Island]. Nouvelles Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle (in French). 3: 333–501, 366.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1853).
"Eine Aroidee". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 3 (40): 313–314.
doi:
10.1007/BF02056581.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (50): 398–399.
doi:
10.1007/BF02071618.
Archived from the original on 2019-08-15. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1858). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 8 (10): 317–318.
doi:
10.1007/BF02106032.
^Ridley, H.N. (1913).
"Some Bornean Aroideae". Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 51: 201–202.
Archived from the original on 2019-07-28. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^
abMiller, Phillip (1754).
The gardeners dictionary (4th abr. ed.). London: John and James Rivington.
(Because the pagination in the original work, when present at all, can be best described as idiosyncratic, only links are given here. A
facsimile edition with continuous pagination exists.)
^Jumelle, Henri (1928).
"Un Nouveau Genre malgache d'Aracées" [A new Madagascan genus of Araceae]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 4 (in French). 6 (2): 21–24.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Fischer, F.E.L.; Meyer, C.A. (1845).
"Asterostigma, eine neue Pflanzengattung aus Brasilien" [Asterostigma, a new plant genus from Brazil]. Bulletin de la Classe Physico-Mathématique de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg (in German). 3 (10–11): 148–149.
^Nicolson, Dan H. (1984). "Suprageneric Names Attributable to Araceae". Taxon. 33 (4): 680–690, 690.
doi:
10.2307/1220785.
JSTOR1220785.
^Ventenat, Et.P. (1800).
"Dissertation sur le genre Arum". Magasin Encyclopédique (in French). 4: 461–472.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2013-08-03.
^Urban, I. (1895).
"Diagnosen neuer Arten und kleinere Mitteilungen" [Diagnoses of new species and minor communications]. Notizblatt des Königlichen botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin (in German). 1 (1): 18–32, 27.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Jumelle, Henri (1919).
"Les Aracées de Madagascar" [The Araceae of Madagascar]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 3 (in French). 7 (2): 179–189, 187.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (52): 414–415.
doi:
10.1007/BF02073220.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-23. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Appendix generum et specierum novarum et minus cognitarum, quae in horto regio botanico Berolinensi coluntur. Berlin: C. Feisteri. 1855. p. 2.
^Bunting, George S. (1975). "Nuevas Especies para la Revision de las Araceas Venezolanas" [New species for the revision of Venezuelan Araceae]. Acta Botánica Venezuélica. 10 (1/4): 263–335, 264.
JSTOR41740660.
^Dalzell, N.A. (1852).
"Contributions to the Botany of Western India". Hooker's Journal of Botany and Kew Garden Miscellany. 4: 107–114, 289–295, 341–347, 289.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2013-09-13.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (51): 406–407.
doi:
10.1007/BF02071943.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H. (1857).
"Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (54): 421–422.
doi:
10.1007/BF02230209.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hotta, M. (1965). "Notes on Schismatoglottidinae of Borneo. I.". Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imperial University, Series B. 32 (1): 19–30, 29.
^Tenore, Michele (1839). "Della Pinellia nuovo genere nella famiglia delle Aroidee; memoria". Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, Sezione della Società Reale Borbonica. 4: 57–71.
^"New Garden Plants". The Gardeners' Chronicle. New Series. 11 (1): 138. 1879.
Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Engler, A. (1893).
"Araceae Africanae". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 15 (4): 447–466, 455.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Schott, H.G. (1860).
Prodromus systematis Aroidearum. Vienna: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae. p. 214.
Archived from the original on 2016-08-22. Retrieved 2013-09-19.
^Schott, H. (1859).
"Aroideenskizzen". Bonplandia (in German). 7 (11): 163–165.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-22. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Hooker, J. (1831).
"Spathicarpa hastifolia". Botanical Miscellany. 2: 146–148.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-18. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
^Koch, C. (1862). "Steudnera colocasiaefolia, Eine neue Aroidee". Wochenscrift des Vereines zur Befördung des Gärtenbaues in den Königl. Preussischen Staaten für Gärtnerei und Pflanzenkunde (in German). 5: 114–116.
^Engler, A. (1883).
"Beiträge zur Kentniss der Aracee" [Contributions to the knowledge of the Aracee]. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 4: 59–66.
Archived from the original on 2020-02-22. Retrieved 2013-09-26.
^Engler, A. (1906).
"Ulearum Engl. nov. gen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 37 (1): 95–96.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2018-02-20.