Shouldn't this be on commons? -- Jtneill - Talk 13:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
{{Support}}
commons:File:Question book-new.svg
exists.-
Hkhk59333
(
talk
)
05:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
How do you get this page unprotected?
Runjonrun (
talk)
06:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
It would be great to compress this image, particularly given how frequently this image is used.
After running it through svgo I was able to reduce the file size by 20.86% . It is a lossy change, but the visual difference is not noticeable.
Jamesmstone ( talk) 02:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please make sure
this file has the image/svg+xml
MIME type like all the other SVG files. Otherwise, web applications have a hard time working with it. Thank you.
Ender and
Peter
19:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain
instead of image/svg+xml
. You can see this if you open up the browser console and look at the request/response details for these files. I do not believe this can be addressed by uploading a different file (although I will prod at this file a little bit to see if maybe I'm wrong, as the only thing I can think of that would cause this on the file level is some error in the markup perhaps).TypesConfig
directive that names a file with which MIME types are associated with file extensions. In the default config for httpd, you'll find a line in the main conf file that sets TypesConfig conf/mime.types
and in the conf/mime.types
file you'll find a line like the following:image/svg+xml svg svgz
Content-Type
when serving files with those extensions. And so, one would think that Wikimedia's servers are similarly configured, yet here is an single SVG file that is not getting that header set.text/plain
-served file and KDiff tells me that "Files A and B are binary equal", and so I really do believe
this is the exact same file which my local installation of httpd has no trouble serving as image/svg+xml
.text/plain
. It indeed really looks like something is out of sorts on the server side, but I'm still not sure what exactly... I'm noticing how the previous image was archived yet still is plain text, so it doesn't seem like this just happens with the current image. Somehow, the manner in which the file was originally served is maintained in that archive link. Again, even the previous image loads just fine on any other web server so that I am compelled to rule out an issue with the file contents, yet open to the possibility I could be mistaken. Well, I hope that there's some way to get the attention of the people who are more familiar with what's happening at the server level.
Ender and
Peter
17:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)<svg>
tag, there is no XML declaration; (ii) the <svg>
tag lacks a version=
attribute. In the case of the 12 June 2016 version of
File:Question book-new.svg it starts <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 13.0.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 14948) -->
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd" [
<!ENTITY ns_flows "http://ns.adobe.com/Flows/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_extend "http://ns.adobe.com/Extensibility/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_ai "http://ns.adobe.com/AdobeIllustrator/10.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_graphs "http://ns.adobe.com/Graphs/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_vars "http://ns.adobe.com/Variables/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_imrep "http://ns.adobe.com/ImageReplacement/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_sfw "http://ns.adobe.com/SaveForWeb/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_custom "http://ns.adobe.com/GenericCustomNamespace/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_adobe_xpath "http://ns.adobe.com/XPath/1.0/">
]>
<svg version="1.0"
xmlns:x="&ns_extend;" xmlns:i="&ns_ai;" xmlns:graph="&ns_graphs;" i:viewOrigin="21 142" i:rulerOrigin="0 0" i:pageBounds="0 90 300 0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:a="http://ns.adobe.com/AdobeSVGViewerExtensions/3.0/"
x="0px" y="0px" width="262px" height="204px" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
and the version="1.0"
attribute on the <svg>
tag. Try adding both of those in to the 12 June 2016 version, thus: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<svg version="1.0" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
xml
preamble. Salvidrim!, I went ahead and made such
an edit to the previous latest file so go ahead and use that one. Basically, just upload this file to be the current version. Thanks a lot to everyone who looked into this.
Ender and
Peter
22:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This must have been added expansions from the archetype, as it is most normal with texts of Bharat. Details could be implanted depending on the requirements of both time and space, but archetype theories remain. 1.23.123.37 ( talk) 07:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Not sure if this should go in the Commons discussion page, if so my apologies. In any event, I think the current design is dated, in particular the squiggly text lines of the left page and the question mark font on the right page. My computer drawing skills are nonexistent but it would be greatly appreciated if someone could update the design of this image, mostly by straightening out the "text" on the left page and changing the font of the question mark on the right. (To preempt a potential opposing talking point, this isn't reinventing the wheel so much as it's putting new tires on, IMO.) Apologies if I come of as rude. Thanks! - John M Wolfson ( talk) 03:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be on commons? -- Jtneill - Talk 13:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
{{Support}}
commons:File:Question book-new.svg
exists.-
Hkhk59333
(
talk
)
05:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
How do you get this page unprotected?
Runjonrun (
talk)
06:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
It would be great to compress this image, particularly given how frequently this image is used.
After running it through svgo I was able to reduce the file size by 20.86% . It is a lossy change, but the visual difference is not noticeable.
Jamesmstone ( talk) 02:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please make sure
this file has the image/svg+xml
MIME type like all the other SVG files. Otherwise, web applications have a hard time working with it. Thank you.
Ender and
Peter
19:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain
instead of image/svg+xml
. You can see this if you open up the browser console and look at the request/response details for these files. I do not believe this can be addressed by uploading a different file (although I will prod at this file a little bit to see if maybe I'm wrong, as the only thing I can think of that would cause this on the file level is some error in the markup perhaps).TypesConfig
directive that names a file with which MIME types are associated with file extensions. In the default config for httpd, you'll find a line in the main conf file that sets TypesConfig conf/mime.types
and in the conf/mime.types
file you'll find a line like the following:image/svg+xml svg svgz
Content-Type
when serving files with those extensions. And so, one would think that Wikimedia's servers are similarly configured, yet here is an single SVG file that is not getting that header set.text/plain
-served file and KDiff tells me that "Files A and B are binary equal", and so I really do believe
this is the exact same file which my local installation of httpd has no trouble serving as image/svg+xml
.text/plain
. It indeed really looks like something is out of sorts on the server side, but I'm still not sure what exactly... I'm noticing how the previous image was archived yet still is plain text, so it doesn't seem like this just happens with the current image. Somehow, the manner in which the file was originally served is maintained in that archive link. Again, even the previous image loads just fine on any other web server so that I am compelled to rule out an issue with the file contents, yet open to the possibility I could be mistaken. Well, I hope that there's some way to get the attention of the people who are more familiar with what's happening at the server level.
Ender and
Peter
17:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)<svg>
tag, there is no XML declaration; (ii) the <svg>
tag lacks a version=
attribute. In the case of the 12 June 2016 version of
File:Question book-new.svg it starts <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 13.0.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 14948) -->
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd" [
<!ENTITY ns_flows "http://ns.adobe.com/Flows/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_extend "http://ns.adobe.com/Extensibility/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_ai "http://ns.adobe.com/AdobeIllustrator/10.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_graphs "http://ns.adobe.com/Graphs/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_vars "http://ns.adobe.com/Variables/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_imrep "http://ns.adobe.com/ImageReplacement/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_sfw "http://ns.adobe.com/SaveForWeb/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_custom "http://ns.adobe.com/GenericCustomNamespace/1.0/">
<!ENTITY ns_adobe_xpath "http://ns.adobe.com/XPath/1.0/">
]>
<svg version="1.0"
xmlns:x="&ns_extend;" xmlns:i="&ns_ai;" xmlns:graph="&ns_graphs;" i:viewOrigin="21 142" i:rulerOrigin="0 0" i:pageBounds="0 90 300 0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:a="http://ns.adobe.com/AdobeSVGViewerExtensions/3.0/"
x="0px" y="0px" width="262px" height="204px" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
and the version="1.0"
attribute on the <svg>
tag. Try adding both of those in to the 12 June 2016 version, thus: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<svg version="1.0" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 262 204" enable-background="new 0 0 262 204" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
xml
preamble. Salvidrim!, I went ahead and made such
an edit to the previous latest file so go ahead and use that one. Basically, just upload this file to be the current version. Thanks a lot to everyone who looked into this.
Ender and
Peter
22:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This must have been added expansions from the archetype, as it is most normal with texts of Bharat. Details could be implanted depending on the requirements of both time and space, but archetype theories remain. 1.23.123.37 ( talk) 07:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Not sure if this should go in the Commons discussion page, if so my apologies. In any event, I think the current design is dated, in particular the squiggly text lines of the left page and the question mark font on the right page. My computer drawing skills are nonexistent but it would be greatly appreciated if someone could update the design of this image, mostly by straightening out the "text" on the left page and changing the font of the question mark on the right. (To preempt a potential opposing talking point, this isn't reinventing the wheel so much as it's putting new tires on, IMO.) Apologies if I come of as rude. Thanks! - John M Wolfson ( talk) 03:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)