|
Feel free to add comments - I appreciate discussion and collaboration. - Past Talk |
--.../ Nemo ( talk • Contributions) 15:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
You don't have any personal information on your page such as your name, education and intersts. I found you listed under acedemic psychologists. I would like to know your specialty areas, what articles you are working on/have worked on etc. Thank you. 24.56.242.121 ( talk) 15:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)amyanda2000 (I know I need to sign on, but I'm feeling to lazy to try to remember my password)
An article which you edited clear back in 2005, is now up for deletion. You are welcome to comment there. Ikip ( talk) 07:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up - I've voted keep and add some more content to the article. -- Jtneill - Talk 11:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi -- thanks for your efforts at protecting Wikipedia. Let me just mention that when you spot a vandal edit, it's good to be alert to the possibility that it was one of a sequence. Reverting only the most recent edit may actually make it harder for other editors who watch the article to figure out what is going on, as in Cognition. Regards, Looie496 ( talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Green exercise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article with little content, context or supporting references. Probable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
- Hi, I've tagged the green exercise page for potential deletion, as it contains very little content, does not appear to be a widespread term and appears to be introducing a term rather than describing a concept. Cheers,
Clovis Sangrail (
talk) 09:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, Me again. I'm still not sure about the article as it seems to be a definition rather than a topic ittself, and it and the wikiversiity pages link back to 1 reference. I've listed it for discussion on the AFD page to get a few more opinions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 30#Green exercise.
AfD nomination of Green exercise
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Green exercise. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green exercise. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Teamwork. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamwork. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I saw your edits on the University of Canberra WP entry, and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:
RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT |
REGISTRATION |
SCHEDULE
Hope we'll see you and friends there. Leighblackall ( talk) 00:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jt yes good to see the real live person! Do you think we should have the photos or avatar pictures as in the liquid threads? Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Tharwa Primary School for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Tharwa Primary School, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tharwa Primary School until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 ( talk) 14:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 |
Jtneill has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above is given on behalf of User:La comadreja. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Wikipedia, on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Canberra.) Will I see you there? Cheers, - Peter Ellis - Talk 06:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Adventure Activities Licensing Authority has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 14:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi:
I found the description on Philosophical Research to be very fitting to a current project I'm undertaking. However, I've been unable to find any sources outside of the Wikipedia article (e.g. books or articles) that detail this methodology. Would you mind sharing some references about how to undertake "Philosophical Research"?
Thank you and best,
Ani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.1.208.141 ( talk) 00:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello there, you may be interested in the new discussion on Meta. Your input would be welcome. – SJ + 05:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. -- LauraHale ( talk) 07:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You're invited to Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial on 25 August at the Australian War Memorial. -- LauraHale ( talk) 00:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.
Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)
A concern has occurred here regarding an edit you have made [1] Thanks Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.
Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)
Just a quick reminder to everyone who has indicated their interest on-wiki. The Wikimedia in Higher Education symposium at The University of Sydney is on tomorrow. We have a full day of speakers and workshops, and about 45-50 participants. See you there. -- 99of9 ( talk) 02:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill, it it nice to meet with you at the Wikimedia workshop at Sydney Uni on 5th April 2013. As I am amateur in Wikipedia I need to learn many things from you. Keep in touch thanks Ashishlohorung ( talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Because you have edited Wikipedia:No consensus, your input is requested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:NO CONSENSUS and Wikipedia:NOCONSENSUS. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill. You redirected Interpersonal conflict, yet the destination page says nothing at all about the subject. What was the idea behind the redirect? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 15:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill. Thanks for your help with item above. I see you heve been here for 10 years, so I am sure you must know a few things. I want to work on an article without it being live and have often seen people working in sandboxes. However I don't want it directly in my sandbox, so this is what I did. Could you please take a quick look and let me know if this is okay? Thanks for your help. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, this is sorted out, thanks. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 21:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AndrewBarr2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Message added 19:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stefan2 ( talk) 19:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee ( talk) 01:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Post-purchase rationalization for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post-purchase rationalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-purchase rationalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee ( talk) 11:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee ( talk) 22:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
what are your thoughts on the role of neuromorphic computers in the study of psychology/neuroscience? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Greetings @ Jtneill
Requesting your visit to the article Draft:Irrational beliefs and help expand the same if the topic interests you.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Psychological literacy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 00:09, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Feel free to add comments - I appreciate discussion and collaboration. - Past Talk |
--.../ Nemo ( talk • Contributions) 15:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
You don't have any personal information on your page such as your name, education and intersts. I found you listed under acedemic psychologists. I would like to know your specialty areas, what articles you are working on/have worked on etc. Thank you. 24.56.242.121 ( talk) 15:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)amyanda2000 (I know I need to sign on, but I'm feeling to lazy to try to remember my password)
An article which you edited clear back in 2005, is now up for deletion. You are welcome to comment there. Ikip ( talk) 07:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up - I've voted keep and add some more content to the article. -- Jtneill - Talk 11:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi -- thanks for your efforts at protecting Wikipedia. Let me just mention that when you spot a vandal edit, it's good to be alert to the possibility that it was one of a sequence. Reverting only the most recent edit may actually make it harder for other editors who watch the article to figure out what is going on, as in Cognition. Regards, Looie496 ( talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Green exercise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article with little content, context or supporting references. Probable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
- Hi, I've tagged the green exercise page for potential deletion, as it contains very little content, does not appear to be a widespread term and appears to be introducing a term rather than describing a concept. Cheers,
Clovis Sangrail (
talk) 09:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, Me again. I'm still not sure about the article as it seems to be a definition rather than a topic ittself, and it and the wikiversiity pages link back to 1 reference. I've listed it for discussion on the AFD page to get a few more opinions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 30#Green exercise.
AfD nomination of Green exercise
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Green exercise. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green exercise. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Teamwork. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamwork. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I saw your edits on the University of Canberra WP entry, and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:
RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT |
REGISTRATION |
SCHEDULE
Hope we'll see you and friends there. Leighblackall ( talk) 00:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jt yes good to see the real live person! Do you think we should have the photos or avatar pictures as in the liquid threads? Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Tharwa Primary School for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Tharwa Primary School, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tharwa Primary School until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 ( talk) 14:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
|
Jtneill has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above is given on behalf of User:La comadreja. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Wikipedia, on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Canberra.) Will I see you there? Cheers, - Peter Ellis - Talk 06:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Adventure Activities Licensing Authority has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 14:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi:
I found the description on Philosophical Research to be very fitting to a current project I'm undertaking. However, I've been unable to find any sources outside of the Wikipedia article (e.g. books or articles) that detail this methodology. Would you mind sharing some references about how to undertake "Philosophical Research"?
Thank you and best,
Ani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.1.208.141 ( talk) 00:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello there, you may be interested in the new discussion on Meta. Your input would be welcome. – SJ + 05:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. -- LauraHale ( talk) 07:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You're invited to Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial on 25 August at the Australian War Memorial. -- LauraHale ( talk) 00:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.
Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)
A concern has occurred here regarding an edit you have made [1] Thanks Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.
Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)
Just a quick reminder to everyone who has indicated their interest on-wiki. The Wikimedia in Higher Education symposium at The University of Sydney is on tomorrow. We have a full day of speakers and workshops, and about 45-50 participants. See you there. -- 99of9 ( talk) 02:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill, it it nice to meet with you at the Wikimedia workshop at Sydney Uni on 5th April 2013. As I am amateur in Wikipedia I need to learn many things from you. Keep in touch thanks Ashishlohorung ( talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Because you have edited Wikipedia:No consensus, your input is requested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:NO CONSENSUS and Wikipedia:NOCONSENSUS. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill. You redirected Interpersonal conflict, yet the destination page says nothing at all about the subject. What was the idea behind the redirect? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 15:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jtneill. Thanks for your help with item above. I see you heve been here for 10 years, so I am sure you must know a few things. I want to work on an article without it being live and have often seen people working in sandboxes. However I don't want it directly in my sandbox, so this is what I did. Could you please take a quick look and let me know if this is okay? Thanks for your help. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, this is sorted out, thanks. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 21:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AndrewBarr2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Message added 19:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stefan2 ( talk) 19:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee ( talk) 01:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Post-purchase rationalization for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post-purchase rationalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-purchase rationalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee ( talk) 11:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee ( talk) 22:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jtneill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
what are your thoughts on the role of neuromorphic computers in the study of psychology/neuroscience? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| |
| Ten years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Greetings @ Jtneill
Requesting your visit to the article Draft:Irrational beliefs and help expand the same if the topic interests you.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Psychological literacy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 00:09, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)