![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This image was nominated at Wikipedia:Files for discussion on 2008 July 17. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion review on 30 July 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep endorsed. |
The subject is dead, and its a picture from a movie. It quite simply cannot be replaced with a free image. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
We would like to use this picture in the Hungarian version of the Scouting article. How would it be possible? (These copyright laws are a bit difficult for me...:S ) Thanks! -- Kun25 19:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
To paraphrase my favorite comedy, I don't think that rule means what you want it to mean.
a. Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.
b. Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the Image: namespace.
Using this image in no way violates the spirit or even the letter of this. This isn't the "multiple items of non-free content" that a adresses, nor is it the "an entire work used if only a portion will suffice" spoken of in b. I know you don't like non-free content, FPaS, but your crusade against this image really needs to stop. S. Dean Jameson 17:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I've added some text to the Scouting article that I feel makes this image more appropriate and defensible there. As such, I've readded the FUR here, and replaced the image in the article. S. Dean Jameson 17:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This image was nominated at Wikipedia:Files for discussion on 2008 July 17. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion review on 30 July 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep endorsed. |
The subject is dead, and its a picture from a movie. It quite simply cannot be replaced with a free image. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
We would like to use this picture in the Hungarian version of the Scouting article. How would it be possible? (These copyright laws are a bit difficult for me...:S ) Thanks! -- Kun25 19:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
To paraphrase my favorite comedy, I don't think that rule means what you want it to mean.
a. Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.
b. Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the Image: namespace.
Using this image in no way violates the spirit or even the letter of this. This isn't the "multiple items of non-free content" that a adresses, nor is it the "an entire work used if only a portion will suffice" spoken of in b. I know you don't like non-free content, FPaS, but your crusade against this image really needs to stop. S. Dean Jameson 17:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I've added some text to the Scouting article that I feel makes this image more appropriate and defensible there. As such, I've readded the FUR here, and replaced the image in the article. S. Dean Jameson 17:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)