This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's a fifty year old organization with more than five thousand members. -- fgnievinski ( talk) 15:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Indian Society of Remote Sensing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
19:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra, WP:DRAFTIFY warns explicitly that "It is not intended as a backdoor route to deletion." Furthermore, it also recommends as best practice that "If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and if it is not notable, list at AfD." So, with all due respect, could you please restore the article into mainspace and start a proper AfD nomination. Thanks. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's a fifty year old organization with more than five thousand members. -- fgnievinski ( talk) 15:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Indian Society of Remote Sensing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
19:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra, WP:DRAFTIFY warns explicitly that "It is not intended as a backdoor route to deletion." Furthermore, it also recommends as best practice that "If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and if it is not notable, list at AfD." So, with all due respect, could you please restore the article into mainspace and start a proper AfD nomination. Thanks. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)