Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,437 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Jaime Claudio Villamil ( talk:  + · bio) · ( log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search:  Google,  Bing,  Wikipedia) · Submitted 49 days ago by JeanetteMartin ( talk:  D · +) · Last edited 49 days ago by JeanetteMartin

Submission declined on 16 January 2024 by UtherSRG ( talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by UtherSRG 3 months ago. Last edited by JeanetteMartin 49 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 25 October 2023 by MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 22 June 2023 by Scope creep ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Scope creep 10 months ago.

Submission declined on 16 November 2022 by UtherSRG ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by UtherSRG 17 months ago.

Submission declined on 6 March 2021 by TJMSmith ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by TJMSmith 3 years ago.

Submission declined on 27 September 2020 by DGG ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DGG 3 years ago.

• Comment: Adding a YouTube link did not improve the article - and it should not be added as a reference, only as an external link. See WP:RSPYT. Please also read WP:BACKWARDS to get a better idea on how to successfully write an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: for any bibliographic information, all information must be cited per WP:BLP. Please review the early life section and make adjustments as necessary microbiologyMarcus ^{( petri dish)} 14:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Please read the policy links in the comment below. Answer the question "What is notable about this professor that satisfies these policies?" Then provide edits and citations that support your answer. UtherSRG (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: This physician and academic does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. If that changes, feel free to resubmit. TJMSmith ( talk) 17:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Dr. Jaime Claudio Villamil is a Puerto Rican medical doctor, television reporter, psychologist, professor, and writer who has published a book on the uses of medical cannabis, in addition to numerous newspaper columns in El Nuevo Día. He has a family practice in Santurce, San Juan, Puerto Rico. ^[1] Claudio Villamil is a professor AD-Honorem at Universidad de Puerto Rico. ^[2] He studied at the Georgia Institute of Technology and graduated cum laude at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is known internationally for his advocacy for the use of medical cannabis and for his work in Puerto Rico during the COVID-19 pandemic. ^[3]

Early life

Claudio Villamil was born in Santurce, Puerto Rico, an area of San Juan, the son of José Antonio Claudio, who was an accountant, and of television actress Adela Villamil. He was raised near two cinemas, one named Cine Metro and the other one Cinema Paramount. As a kid, he was a fan of cinema and he used to attend those two places to watch movies, He also enjoyed roller skating.

He studied at the Georgia Institute of Technology and at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. ^[4]

Media career

Starting in 1983, Claudio Villamil became the medicine news reporter at WAPA-TV's Noticentro 4 daily television news show. He later also reported at Tele-Once. He still appears at WAPA-America's shows from time to time. ^[5]

Claudio Villamil is also a radio personality, and he collaborates on Puerto Rico's Radioisla. ^[6]

As of the early 2020s, Claudio Villamil was also a columnist, writing about medicine on the Puerto Rican newspaper, El Nuevo Dia. ^[7]

Claudio Villamil also has a channel on You Tube. ^[8]

In 2021, Claudio Villamil was recognized with the Rafael and Celestina Cordero award by the Puerto Rican Community Foundation. ^[9]

Cannabis advocacy

Claudio Villamil is an advocate of the medicinal use of marijuana, and he wrote a book on the subject, titled Cannabis Medicinal: Recomendando, Formulando, Dosificando, which was first published in 2019. ^[10] The book was re-released in 2022. ^{[11] [12]}

Claudio Villamil is also a member of the Doctor's Cannabis Medicine Certification Course Faculty in Puerto Rico, and he believes that most Puerto Rican doctors should be licensed to prescribe marijuana as a pain killer alternative, but has expressed concerns about the treatments patients would receive. ^[13]

COSACO

As a response to the COVID-19 outbreak, Claudio Villamil was one of a group of prominent persons to unite under an organization named "Coalision de Sabiduria Coronavirus" ("Coronavirus Knowledge Coalition") or "COSACO", as a way to fight the outbreak. ^[14]

Claudio Villamil was also a signer of a petition by a group named "Ciencia Puerto Rico" to San Juan mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz for her city to subscribe to the "Municipal System for Investigation of Cases and Tracking of Contact" (SMICRC) a nationwide system in Puerto Rico that investigates cases of the disease. ^[15]

See also

• List of Puerto Ricans

References

Category:Living people (year of birth missing) Category:Puerto Rican media people Category:Puerto Rican physicians Category:Puerto Rican writers Category:Puerto Rican television journalists Category:Puerto Rican television people Category:Puerto Rican people Category:Puerto Rican psychiatrists Category:Georgia Institute of Technology alumni Category:University of Wisconsin-Madison alumni

This biographical article related to medicine is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e