![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,520 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 21 April 2024 by
Johannes Maximilian (
talk). This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 7 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 16 June 2023 by
S0091 (
talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's
minimum standard for inline citations. Please
cite your sources using
footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see
Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
S0091 13 months ago. | ![]() |
N. S. Nappinai is an Indian advocate specializing in constitutional, criminal, intellectual property rights, and cyber laws. [1] Admitted to the bar in 1991, she holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) degree from the University of Madras and a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from the University of Pune. [2] Nappinai further pursued a Postgraduate Certificate in Cyber Policy, Cyber Governance, and Cyber Security from Cranfield University, U.K.. [3] [4]
Nappinai's legal career spans over three decades. She is an advocate before the Supreme Court of India and has expertise in various legal domains. [5] Her work has involved representing the State of Kerala in a significant data protection case during the COVID-19 lockdown. [6] [7] Additionally, she served as Amicus Curiae before the Supreme Court in the matter of Prajwala Letter dated February 18, 2015 ( Suo motu Criminal Writ Petition 3/2015) concerning violent videos and recommendations. [8] [9]
Nappinai has authored two books: "Technology Laws Decoded" ( LexisNexis, 2017) [10] [11] [12] and "CSassy Tales: Cybercrime Stories & the Law" (Oakbridge Publishing, 2022). [13] As per Business Line, the former provides a comprehensive guide to cyber laws in India, [14] while the latter uses a storytelling approach to highlight cybercrimes and legal remedies. [15] Her articles, including "Electronic Evidence: The Great Indian Quagmire" (2019)”, [16] "Cyber Crime Law in India: Has Law Kept Pace with Emerging Trends? - An Empirical Study" [17] and "Dark Side of IoT" [18] have been cited in legal publications.
Nappinai actively contributes to education and awareness in the field of cyber law. She has served as visiting faculty at the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal, [19] and other state judicial academies, training judiciary, government agencies, [20] law enforcement and intelligence agencies, [21] [22] and armed forces personnel for nearly two decades. She is also on the editorial board of the Anthem Ethics of Personal Data Collection series of Anthem Press. [23]
In 2020, Nappinai founded the Cyber Saathi Foundation, [24] a non–profit organization working on law and policy-making in the digital domain. [25] The foundation contributes to submissions before the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and raises awareness about cyber threats. [26] Its activities align with the SDG Goals 2030, particularly focusing on gender equality. [27]
Nappinai has been recognized for her work in the field of cybersecurity. She was named among the Top 100 Women in Cybersecurity in India [28] and is considered one of India's Top 30 Blockchain Influencers. [29]
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,520 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 21 April 2024 by
Johannes Maximilian (
talk). This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 7 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 16 June 2023 by
S0091 (
talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's
minimum standard for inline citations. Please
cite your sources using
footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see
Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
S0091 13 months ago. | ![]() |
N. S. Nappinai is an Indian advocate specializing in constitutional, criminal, intellectual property rights, and cyber laws. [1] Admitted to the bar in 1991, she holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) degree from the University of Madras and a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from the University of Pune. [2] Nappinai further pursued a Postgraduate Certificate in Cyber Policy, Cyber Governance, and Cyber Security from Cranfield University, U.K.. [3] [4]
Nappinai's legal career spans over three decades. She is an advocate before the Supreme Court of India and has expertise in various legal domains. [5] Her work has involved representing the State of Kerala in a significant data protection case during the COVID-19 lockdown. [6] [7] Additionally, she served as Amicus Curiae before the Supreme Court in the matter of Prajwala Letter dated February 18, 2015 ( Suo motu Criminal Writ Petition 3/2015) concerning violent videos and recommendations. [8] [9]
Nappinai has authored two books: "Technology Laws Decoded" ( LexisNexis, 2017) [10] [11] [12] and "CSassy Tales: Cybercrime Stories & the Law" (Oakbridge Publishing, 2022). [13] As per Business Line, the former provides a comprehensive guide to cyber laws in India, [14] while the latter uses a storytelling approach to highlight cybercrimes and legal remedies. [15] Her articles, including "Electronic Evidence: The Great Indian Quagmire" (2019)”, [16] "Cyber Crime Law in India: Has Law Kept Pace with Emerging Trends? - An Empirical Study" [17] and "Dark Side of IoT" [18] have been cited in legal publications.
Nappinai actively contributes to education and awareness in the field of cyber law. She has served as visiting faculty at the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal, [19] and other state judicial academies, training judiciary, government agencies, [20] law enforcement and intelligence agencies, [21] [22] and armed forces personnel for nearly two decades. She is also on the editorial board of the Anthem Ethics of Personal Data Collection series of Anthem Press. [23]
In 2020, Nappinai founded the Cyber Saathi Foundation, [24] a non–profit organization working on law and policy-making in the digital domain. [25] The foundation contributes to submissions before the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and raises awareness about cyber threats. [26] Its activities align with the SDG Goals 2030, particularly focusing on gender equality. [27]
Nappinai has been recognized for her work in the field of cybersecurity. She was named among the Top 100 Women in Cybersecurity in India [28] and is considered one of India's Top 30 Blockchain Influencers. [29]