| Submission rejected on 28 April 2024 by
Qcne (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 2 months ago. Last edited by Primefac 2 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 28 April 2024 by
SafariScribe (
talk). This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the
sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. Declined by
SafariScribe 2 months ago. |  |
This was quoted during a presentation to Shaw and Partners discussion about Project Texas
Darc Rasmussen quoted this new word on the 18th April 2024
| Submission rejected on 28 April 2024 by
Qcne (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 2 months ago. Last edited by Primefac 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 April 2024 by
SafariScribe (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the
sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. Declined by
SafariScribe 2 months ago. | |
This was quoted during a presentation to Shaw and Partners discussion about Project Texas
Darc Rasmussen quoted this new word on the 18th April 2024
-
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.