Submission declined on 1 July 2024 by DoubleGrazing ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by DoubleGrazing 16 days ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 16 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by Anuwrites ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Have you visited the Wikipedia home page? You can probably find a version of Wikipedia in your language. Declined by Anuwrites 19 days ago.

• Comment: I must add that I'm a bit confused as to what this draft is trying to do. It seems the main topic is the Selkirk Grace, which itself doesn't have a dedicated article, but instead redirects to Burns_supper#Selkirk_Grace. This provides translations of it (with some explanatory notes), but why would those translations warrant an article? Or am I missing something? DoubleGrazing ( talk) 11:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: It doesn't seem that the sources actually support much, if anything, in this draft. They certainly don't establish notability, as most of them don't even mention 'Kaipātiki Grace'. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 11:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Wikiepidia can't be used as a reference to a wikipedia article. ANU^writes 06:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Kua whiwhi ētahi i te kai, engari kāore e taea te kai. Kua kore ētahi i te kai, engari e hiahiatia ana. Engari, kua whiwhi mātou i te kai, ā, ka taea e mātou te kai, nā reira, me whakawhetai tātou ki te Ariki. Amine.

Some have food, but cannot eat. Some have no food, but are hungry. But, we have food, and we can eat, therefore, let us thank the Lord. Amen.

The Selkirk Grace has been believed to have been prayed by Scottish settlers in New Zealand since early arrival. Burns Night in New Zealand was allegedly first held in Dunedin in 1861 and it is unlikely that the Selkirk Grace would not have been done as it is one of the key addresses during festivities.. ^{[1] [2]} The Kaipātiki Grace is a transliteration of the famous Scottish Selkirk Grace. This Karakia (prayer) was specifically recited on August 28th, 2024, at the Kaipātiki Matariki event ^[3] held at Malborough Park Hall in Glenfield, Auckland, New Zealand hosted by the Kaipātiki Local Board ^[4]. The event is held annually by the Kaipātiki Community Facilities Trust ^[5] (KCFT).

Some hae meat but canna eat, Some hae nane that want it; But we hae meat and we can eat, Sae let the Lord be thankit ^{[6] [7]}

Some have meat but cannot eat, Some have none that want it; But we have meat and we can eat, So let the Lord be thanked.

Scots Language:

Scots is a Germanic language with roots in Old English (Anglo-Saxon). It evolved from the Northumbrian dialect of Old English and has been influenced by Norse, Latin, Gaelic, and later English ^[8]