![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,876 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 25 June 2024 by
S0091 (
talk). The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at
Human rights in South Sudan. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 February 2024 by
MicrobiologyMarcus (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
MicrobiologyMarcus 4 months ago.
| ![]() |
The Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan is a United Nations commission of Inquiry established by the United Nations Human Rights Council. [1] [2]. Established through Resolution 31/20 on 23 March 2016, the Commission is mandated to monitor and investigate human rights violations in South Sudan. Its mandate is renewed on yearly basis upon the decision by the 47 member states of the Human Rights Council. A number of stakeholders also express their opinions on the work of the Commission and its existence during the Council debate [3].
The Commission is headed by three Commissioners, appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council [4]. Currently, the members of the Commission are Ms. Yasmin Sooka [5] [6] (chairperson, from South Africa), Mr. Barney Afako [7] [8] [9] [10] (from Uganda), Mr. Carlos Castresana Fernandes [11] [12] [13] (from Spain). The Commissioners are supported by a secretariat based in Juba, South Sudan.
The Commission publishes annual inquiry reports (also called Mandate Reports) detailing the overall human rights situation in South Sudan and also publishes thematic reports known as Conference Room Papers (CRPs). These reports primarily focus on severe violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, with a great emphasis on conflict-related sexual violence [14] [15]. The Commission's secretariat staff and the three Commissioners conduct fact-finding missions across South Sudan and neighboring countries to interview victims and witnesses. These investigative findings form the foundation of the Commission's reports. Researchers frequently delve into the granular details of several events of violations documented in the Commission's report to discuss issues of impunity and accountability [16]. The Commission's reports are extensively utilized by international communities, including governments and NGOs, to strengthen their advocacy efforts and inform policy/response formation decisions [17] [18] [19] [20].
Some of the recent reports released by the Commission are as below:
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,876 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 25 June 2024 by
S0091 (
talk). The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at
Human rights in South Sudan. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 February 2024 by
MicrobiologyMarcus (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
MicrobiologyMarcus 4 months ago.
| ![]() |
The Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan is a United Nations commission of Inquiry established by the United Nations Human Rights Council. [1] [2]. Established through Resolution 31/20 on 23 March 2016, the Commission is mandated to monitor and investigate human rights violations in South Sudan. Its mandate is renewed on yearly basis upon the decision by the 47 member states of the Human Rights Council. A number of stakeholders also express their opinions on the work of the Commission and its existence during the Council debate [3].
The Commission is headed by three Commissioners, appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council [4]. Currently, the members of the Commission are Ms. Yasmin Sooka [5] [6] (chairperson, from South Africa), Mr. Barney Afako [7] [8] [9] [10] (from Uganda), Mr. Carlos Castresana Fernandes [11] [12] [13] (from Spain). The Commissioners are supported by a secretariat based in Juba, South Sudan.
The Commission publishes annual inquiry reports (also called Mandate Reports) detailing the overall human rights situation in South Sudan and also publishes thematic reports known as Conference Room Papers (CRPs). These reports primarily focus on severe violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, with a great emphasis on conflict-related sexual violence [14] [15]. The Commission's secretariat staff and the three Commissioners conduct fact-finding missions across South Sudan and neighboring countries to interview victims and witnesses. These investigative findings form the foundation of the Commission's reports. Researchers frequently delve into the granular details of several events of violations documented in the Commission's report to discuss issues of impunity and accountability [16]. The Commission's reports are extensively utilized by international communities, including governments and NGOs, to strengthen their advocacy efforts and inform policy/response formation decisions [17] [18] [19] [20].
Some of the recent reports released by the Commission are as below: