Zeno (or Zenon, Koinē Greek: Ζήνων; 3rd and 2nd centuries BC) was a Greek physician.
He was one of the most eminent of the followers of Herophilus, [1] whom Galen calls "no ordinary man," [2] and who is said by Diogenes Laërtius [3] to have been better able to think than to write. He lived probably at the end of the 3rd and beginning of the 2nd centuries BC, as he was a contemporary of Apollonius Empiricus, with whom he carried on a controversy concerning the meaning of certain marks ( Koinē Greek: χαρακτῆρες) that are found at the end of some of the chapters of the third book of the Epidemics of Hippocrates. [4] He gave particular attention to the materia medica, [5] and is perhaps the physician whose medical formulae are quoted by Galen, [6] in which case he must have been a native of Laodicea. He is mentioned in several other passages by Galen, and also by Erotianus; [7] perhaps also by Pliny, [8] Caelius Aurelianus, [9] Alexander of Aphrodisias, [10] and Rufus of Ephesus, [11] but this is uncertain.
- ^ Galen, De Differ. Puls., iv. 8, col. vii.
- ^ Galen, Comment. in Hippocr. Epid. III., ii. 4, vol. xvii. pt. i.
- ^ Diogenes Laërtius, vii. 1. 35
- ^ Galen, Comment. in Hippocr. Epid. III., ii. 5, vol. xvii. pt. i.
- ^ Celsus. De Medic. v. praef.
- ^ Galen, De Antid. ii. 10, 11, vol. xiv.
- ^ Erotianus, Gloss. Hippocr.
- ^ Pliny, H. N., xxii. 44
- ^ Caelius Aurelianus, De Morb. Chron. iv. 7
- ^ Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Febr. c. 2
- ^ Rufus of Ephesus, De Appell. Part. Corp. Hum., i. 36
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the
public domain:
Smith, William, ed. (1870).
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. {{ cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty|title=( help)
Zeno (or Zenon, Koinē Greek: Ζήνων; 3rd and 2nd centuries BC) was a Greek physician.
He was one of the most eminent of the followers of Herophilus, [1] whom Galen calls "no ordinary man," [2] and who is said by Diogenes Laërtius [3] to have been better able to think than to write. He lived probably at the end of the 3rd and beginning of the 2nd centuries BC, as he was a contemporary of Apollonius Empiricus, with whom he carried on a controversy concerning the meaning of certain marks ( Koinē Greek: χαρακτῆρες) that are found at the end of some of the chapters of the third book of the Epidemics of Hippocrates. [4] He gave particular attention to the materia medica, [5] and is perhaps the physician whose medical formulae are quoted by Galen, [6] in which case he must have been a native of Laodicea. He is mentioned in several other passages by Galen, and also by Erotianus; [7] perhaps also by Pliny, [8] Caelius Aurelianus, [9] Alexander of Aphrodisias, [10] and Rufus of Ephesus, [11] but this is uncertain.
- ^ Galen, De Differ. Puls., iv. 8, col. vii.
- ^ Galen, Comment. in Hippocr. Epid. III., ii. 4, vol. xvii. pt. i.
- ^ Diogenes Laërtius, vii. 1. 35
- ^ Galen, Comment. in Hippocr. Epid. III., ii. 5, vol. xvii. pt. i.
- ^ Celsus. De Medic. v. praef.
- ^ Galen, De Antid. ii. 10, 11, vol. xiv.
- ^ Erotianus, Gloss. Hippocr.
- ^ Pliny, H. N., xxii. 44
- ^ Caelius Aurelianus, De Morb. Chron. iv. 7
- ^ Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Febr. c. 2
- ^ Rufus of Ephesus, De Appell. Part. Corp. Hum., i. 36
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the
public domain:
Smith, William, ed. (1870).
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology.
{{ cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty|title=( help)