 | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please delete the empty cell after {{impossible}}. kwan-in ( talk) 05:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 17:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators →
Template:Sockpuppet investigations indicators – This one is almost used as template in several template documentations. 
Relisted
Armbrust
The Homunculus 01:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
kwan-in (
talk) 04:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose there is only one transclusion, nothing else uses it as a template, so it is inappropriate to have this in TemplateSpace, as it is a single-use-template. -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 06:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please list the template {{ Blockedandtagged}} in the "case decisions" section. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 05:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Done —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 23:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I propose to merge Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Indicators into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators. I think the both articles represent exactly the same content. Is there any particular reason why the two articles should be kept separate? -- 180.64.230.38 ( talk) 14:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Given that
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is deprecated, it may be best at this point to keep them separate. --
Bsherr (
talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- I would probably just slap a {{ historical}} on it and be satisfied with that -- Trialpears ( talk) 14:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please delete the empty cell after {{impossible}}. kwan-in ( talk) 05:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 17:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators →
Template:Sockpuppet investigations indicators – This one is almost used as template in several template documentations. Relisted
Armbrust
The Homunculus 01:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
kwan-in (
talk) 04:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose there is only one transclusion, nothing else uses it as a template, so it is inappropriate to have this in TemplateSpace, as it is a single-use-template. -- 70.24.249.39 ( talk) 06:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please list the template {{ Blockedandtagged}} in the "case decisions" section. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 05:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 23:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I propose to merge Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Indicators into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators. I think the both articles represent exactly the same content. Is there any particular reason why the two articles should be kept separate? -- 180.64.230.38 ( talk) 14:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Given that
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is deprecated, it may be best at this point to keep them separate. --
Bsherr (
talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- I would probably just slap a {{ historical}} on it and be satisfied with that -- Trialpears ( talk) 14:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)