Should "...and on the other hand do accurately reflect the full range or balance of secondary opinions." from the introductory comments have a "not" in it? -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 01:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion about Niemti's GAN issues is being brought to the forefront once again at WT:GAN#Clearing out the VG backlog. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
After a discussion with Salvidrim and at WT:VG, I boldly added a section for additional evidence titled Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti/Additional Evidence. Please post new evidence there. Significant examples of new problems would be needed before taking any necessary action such as blocking him or topic banning him from video games. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
In addition, if we can get enough evidence to attain a rough consensus, we should take it to ANI with that in hand. In the words of David Fuchs, "taking the time for formulate evidence will save everyone more grief and back-and-forth." Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:50, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I've posted a notification at the film, anime and Good article Wikiprojects. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've also posted a notification at the Fictional characters Wikiproject. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
A request to close at WP:AN has been posted by Cunard. Please note that if the RFC is closed, new and significant evidence must be posted here or on the additional evidence subpage. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I'm opposed to banning Niemti for six months. (I'm not sure we can do that through an RfC anyway, as Whatamidoing points out above).
I know it's been dragging on, but eventually, this RfC will receive a real close; we'll hopefully then have a clear community consensus for what Niemti needs to look at changing in his behavior. We should give him a chance to see that consensus and abide by it before a site ban is seriously discussed. I realize I may be in the minority, but wanted to offer my two cents. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
As noted in the closure, the matter has been submitted to the community, at WP:AN#RfC proposal for community sanctions against Niemti. Sandstein 12:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Some people have commented here but please note that it is important that as many people as possible participate in the formal proceedings (with a support or oppose or comment) because a high rate of participation would indicate the concern of the community regarding this issue. That will be important in the future if an unblock proposal is made, or if a similar discussion is undertaken at another project. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 01:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Should "...and on the other hand do accurately reflect the full range or balance of secondary opinions." from the introductory comments have a "not" in it? -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 01:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion about Niemti's GAN issues is being brought to the forefront once again at WT:GAN#Clearing out the VG backlog. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
After a discussion with Salvidrim and at WT:VG, I boldly added a section for additional evidence titled Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti/Additional Evidence. Please post new evidence there. Significant examples of new problems would be needed before taking any necessary action such as blocking him or topic banning him from video games. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
In addition, if we can get enough evidence to attain a rough consensus, we should take it to ANI with that in hand. In the words of David Fuchs, "taking the time for formulate evidence will save everyone more grief and back-and-forth." Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:50, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I've posted a notification at the film, anime and Good article Wikiprojects. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've also posted a notification at the Fictional characters Wikiproject. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
A request to close at WP:AN has been posted by Cunard. Please note that if the RFC is closed, new and significant evidence must be posted here or on the additional evidence subpage. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I'm opposed to banning Niemti for six months. (I'm not sure we can do that through an RfC anyway, as Whatamidoing points out above).
I know it's been dragging on, but eventually, this RfC will receive a real close; we'll hopefully then have a clear community consensus for what Niemti needs to look at changing in his behavior. We should give him a chance to see that consensus and abide by it before a site ban is seriously discussed. I realize I may be in the minority, but wanted to offer my two cents. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
As noted in the closure, the matter has been submitted to the community, at WP:AN#RfC proposal for community sanctions against Niemti. Sandstein 12:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Some people have commented here but please note that it is important that as many people as possible participate in the formal proceedings (with a support or oppose or comment) because a high rate of participation would indicate the concern of the community regarding this issue. That will be important in the future if an unblock proposal is made, or if a similar discussion is undertaken at another project. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 01:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)