I dont know if this means anything but I would appreciate if you didnt, "jump the list" on the evidence present page. Please move your evidence to the bottom of the list. It works like a queue. So if you came here after me, you will have to post your evidence below mine.
Thank you --
Unre4L
ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ
UT 23:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, edit conflict.
JFD 12:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment on Pakistan Studies
I am not planning to follow this RfA, but since I have been named for "Plotting with Bakaman to write a hate article on Pakistan Studies", I must say that I am indeed planning to write an article on Pakistan Studies, since being a compulsary part of the curriculum, it deserves an article. I have nothing to say about my "personal attacks" or speculation that the article I might write will be a "hate article". deeptrivia ( talk) 02:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the link you provided when you mentioned Pakistan studies
[1]. The title of this article says volumes about your real intentions.
--
Unre4L
ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ
UT 00:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
To Deetrivia:your comments regarding that article on Bakaman's page also indicate that Pakistani users are Jihaddists by relating them to the textbooks.The article you plan on writing clearly serves no purpose than to make Pakistanis look evil.There are many countries that have similar problems,but writing articles on such things serves no purpose other than to give a negative impression.Take for example the accent of Indian people.People around the world ranging from Arabs to North Americans make fun of it.It's even found it's way to popculture.If Pakistanis wrote an article on the Indian accent and how funny they may sound to people around the world,what purpose does it serve on wikipedia other than to make Indians look stupid?Does an article on such an irrelivent subject need to be here in the first place?
To AMbroody:I am not the one denying anything or trying to refraining from admitting anything.It's you who's refusing to admit the truth with comments like: "My folks came from Sindh not Pakistan" Please be reminded that while wikipedia respects your POV,it doesnt allow that kind of POV to go into articles.Yes you and I do share a common linage:We are both Sindhis. Sindh is in Pakistan.That is a fact.Please look on the world map.I believe it,the world belives it,wikipedia belives it.The facts say it.I'm sorry,but if you cant accept that,there is little I can do.-- Nadirali نادرالی
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan/Workshop. You guys know you can use this to interact as well, to make proposals and such, and to discuss them, right? Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I dont know if this means anything but I would appreciate if you didnt, "jump the list" on the evidence present page. Please move your evidence to the bottom of the list. It works like a queue. So if you came here after me, you will have to post your evidence below mine.
Thank you --
Unre4L
ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ
UT 23:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, edit conflict.
JFD 12:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment on Pakistan Studies
I am not planning to follow this RfA, but since I have been named for "Plotting with Bakaman to write a hate article on Pakistan Studies", I must say that I am indeed planning to write an article on Pakistan Studies, since being a compulsary part of the curriculum, it deserves an article. I have nothing to say about my "personal attacks" or speculation that the article I might write will be a "hate article". deeptrivia ( talk) 02:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the link you provided when you mentioned Pakistan studies
[1]. The title of this article says volumes about your real intentions.
--
Unre4L
ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ
UT 00:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
To Deetrivia:your comments regarding that article on Bakaman's page also indicate that Pakistani users are Jihaddists by relating them to the textbooks.The article you plan on writing clearly serves no purpose than to make Pakistanis look evil.There are many countries that have similar problems,but writing articles on such things serves no purpose other than to give a negative impression.Take for example the accent of Indian people.People around the world ranging from Arabs to North Americans make fun of it.It's even found it's way to popculture.If Pakistanis wrote an article on the Indian accent and how funny they may sound to people around the world,what purpose does it serve on wikipedia other than to make Indians look stupid?Does an article on such an irrelivent subject need to be here in the first place?
To AMbroody:I am not the one denying anything or trying to refraining from admitting anything.It's you who's refusing to admit the truth with comments like: "My folks came from Sindh not Pakistan" Please be reminded that while wikipedia respects your POV,it doesnt allow that kind of POV to go into articles.Yes you and I do share a common linage:We are both Sindhis. Sindh is in Pakistan.That is a fact.Please look on the world map.I believe it,the world belives it,wikipedia belives it.The facts say it.I'm sorry,but if you cant accept that,there is little I can do.-- Nadirali نادرالی
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan/Workshop. You guys know you can use this to interact as well, to make proposals and such, and to discuss them, right? Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 00:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)