 | The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Editing policy page. |
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5Auto-archiving period: 60 days
 |
 | See WP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. See how to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating of policy and guideline pages. |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 1 Feb 2010. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
The idea explains itself, as Wikipedia maintains an active community and standards unlike pre-2006. Thoughts? 3vvww661 ( talk) 19:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't understand the intent. Could you expand on your thinking?
Schazjmd
(talk) 19:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sure! example sometimes news articles and other external sites and parties make commentary about Wikipedia that isn't fundamentally a criticism, and doesn't contribute a lot and might undermine Wikipedia. Take for example the quote "tells the legendary monarch's tale with all the dramatic heft of a Wikipedia article." from this revision of the article African Queens; because it's not in article Criticism of Wikipedia, there isn't much gained by the article or community.
- Therefore, it'd be best to make it a policy to avoid using quotes, sources and commentaries like these, is the intent. 3vvww661 ( talk) 19:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Please see this discussion which would have a bearing on this policy: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#WP:NOTNEWS/unfolding news stories. DeCausa ( talk) 08:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
In the bold itilatc under how to fix I see the word "excise" I'm confused did the writer mean exercise in the article? 2600:1008:B055:9D1E:7FC5:2195:EA9F:B48B ( talk) 03:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. See wikt:excise. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
|
| The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Editing policy page. |
|
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5Auto-archiving period: 60 days
|
|
| See WP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. See how to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating of policy and guideline pages. |
|
| This page was nominated for deletion on 1 Feb 2010. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
The idea explains itself, as Wikipedia maintains an active community and standards unlike pre-2006. Thoughts? 3vvww661 ( talk) 19:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't understand the intent. Could you expand on your thinking?
Schazjmd
(talk) 19:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sure! example sometimes news articles and other external sites and parties make commentary about Wikipedia that isn't fundamentally a criticism, and doesn't contribute a lot and might undermine Wikipedia. Take for example the quote "tells the legendary monarch's tale with all the dramatic heft of a Wikipedia article." from this revision of the article African Queens; because it's not in article Criticism of Wikipedia, there isn't much gained by the article or community.
- Therefore, it'd be best to make it a policy to avoid using quotes, sources and commentaries like these, is the intent. 3vvww661 ( talk) 19:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Please see this discussion which would have a bearing on this policy: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#WP:NOTNEWS/unfolding news stories. DeCausa ( talk) 08:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
In the bold itilatc under how to fix I see the word "excise" I'm confused did the writer mean exercise in the article? 2600:1008:B055:9D1E:7FC5:2195:EA9F:B48B ( talk) 03:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. See wikt:excise. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)