In case anyone's wondering why User:1Angela is a sysop, it's because I was trying to answer Snoyes' question on the mailing list about whether such things were logged. They are. It appears in the Wikipedia:Bureaucrat log which shows up in recent changes. I have listed 1Angela on Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship. Angela . 19:38, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Heh, we both had the same idea. User:Pcb22 (my sock puppet!) was also made a sysop for testing purpose. Will list at requests for de-adminship. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 20:03, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Bureaucrats seem to have lost the ability to make bureaucrats so I had to make
Ilyanep one using the
steward interface instead, which means it doesn't show up on this log. I'll report it as a bug.
Angela
. 23:07, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
{{sudo}}
Someone add {{ historical}} to this just so it's clear -- Gurch ( talk) 17:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Just need someone to remove the interwikis which are now at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12103660 . Regards, — Moe Epsilon 20:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a stripped tag Lint error in the page. Checking the page history, it was introduced following this edit. The error is in the line that begins with 14:57, 26 Jun 2004 -
<li>14:57, 26 Jun 2004 [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] Rights for user "Johnleemk" set "+sysop<s>+bureaucrat</s> (the bureaucrat rights of this user were added accidentally and removed shortly thereafter; see [[m:Steward requests/Permissions/2004#June|the steward permissions requests archive on Meta]])"</li>"</li>
The redundant "</li> at the end should be removed.
Protection template {{pp|small=yes}} can be added to the top of page as well.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ ( talk) 07:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Done. —
The Earwig (
talk) 01:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change [[Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats|*]] to [[Category:Wikipedia bureaucratship|log]] per
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats
* Pppery *
it has begun... 16:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Was done by MSGJ. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm just wondering AmongusRanger ( talk) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- @
AmongusRanger: Making a request at
Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship and having the community approve you is technically the only requirement, but it's very unlikely you'll succeed without a few years of experience.
Chess (
talk) (please use
{{ reply to|Chess}}on reply) 23:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
In case anyone's wondering why User:1Angela is a sysop, it's because I was trying to answer Snoyes' question on the mailing list about whether such things were logged. They are. It appears in the Wikipedia:Bureaucrat log which shows up in recent changes. I have listed 1Angela on Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship. Angela . 19:38, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Heh, we both had the same idea. User:Pcb22 (my sock puppet!) was also made a sysop for testing purpose. Will list at requests for de-adminship. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 20:03, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Bureaucrats seem to have lost the ability to make bureaucrats so I had to make
Ilyanep one using the
steward interface instead, which means it doesn't show up on this log. I'll report it as a bug.
Angela
. 23:07, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
{{sudo}}
Someone add {{ historical}} to this just so it's clear -- Gurch ( talk) 17:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Just need someone to remove the interwikis which are now at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12103660 . Regards, — Moe Epsilon 20:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a stripped tag Lint error in the page. Checking the page history, it was introduced following this edit. The error is in the line that begins with 14:57, 26 Jun 2004 -
<li>14:57, 26 Jun 2004 [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] Rights for user "Johnleemk" set "+sysop<s>+bureaucrat</s> (the bureaucrat rights of this user were added accidentally and removed shortly thereafter; see [[m:Steward requests/Permissions/2004#June|the steward permissions requests archive on Meta]])"</li>"</li>
The redundant "</li> at the end should be removed.
Protection template {{pp|small=yes}} can be added to the top of page as well.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ ( talk) 07:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done. —
The Earwig (
talk) 01:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change [[Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats|*]] to [[Category:Wikipedia bureaucratship|log]] per
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats
* Pppery *
it has begun... 16:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Was done by MSGJ. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm just wondering AmongusRanger ( talk) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- @
AmongusRanger: Making a request at
Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship and having the community approve you is technically the only requirement, but it's very unlikely you'll succeed without a few years of experience.
Chess (
talk) (please use
{{ reply to|Chess}}on reply) 23:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)