For the terminology “Glove box”, I find the following two things that are needed for the improvement：
1. Since glove box is a complicated experimental device, an introduction towards its structure should be added to help the readers have a better understanding of its working principle. However, in this article, only the gloves are mentioned in the context, and the description is not clear and detailed enough to provide a general idea to readers.
2. In the original contents, few sentences are employed to describe the basic manipulations of glove box, which is indeed important. Instead, only the functions of glove box are mentioned in the article, but the readers must be confused about how to realize these “magic” functions. Yjzhouchem ( talk) 02:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
For the terminology “Glove box”, I find the following two things that are needed for the improvement：
1. Since glove box is a complicated experimental device, an introduction towards its structure should be added to help the readers have a better understanding of its working principle. However, in this article, only the gloves are mentioned in the context, and the description is not clear and detailed enough to provide a general idea to readers.
2. In the original contents, few sentences are employed to describe the basic manipulations of glove box, which is indeed important. Instead, only the functions of glove box are mentioned in the article, but the readers must be confused about how to realize these “magic” functions. Yjzhouchem ( talk) 02:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)