Ukraine Project‑class | |||||||
|
This area has been designated as Talk about Ukrainian Football.
In particular, any discussions on how we can make the topic of Ukrainian Football better in terms of reference with the Encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 16:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Pryvit Xloptsi!
I'm sending a query to the group of current active Wiki Ukrainian football participants about doing some editing to make some of the information more seamless. However, to do that, I really need to get your opinions because I haven't participated here for too long and I don't want to give the wrong signals and put any antagonizations amongst us - there are enough out there already.
Also I like the work that has been done here already and although there needs some solid proof reading I think that that will come.
So here is my suggestion -
One of the areas that I would like to work on is getting all the tables both historical (past seasons) and current weekly updates to be similar. One area is that Druha Liha has 2 different styles for Hrupa A and Hrup B. Of course this stems from that 2 different authors are working on this. The data seems to be ok, but the presentation is not consistent. I would like to get both Druha A and Druha B standings to be the same style. And this is where I would like a consensus to go on because these areas may be "pet projects" and I don't want to offend.
I would prefer to do the standings in the style that Alex G. has initiated them. For me its easier to convert all RSSSF standings (I'm YKPAIHA's representative and update those standings weekly http://www.rsssf.com/tableso/oekr09.html) into a text format that simply plugs in. I have scripts that already automatically do the standings update for RSSSF and I have just recently done the same kind of scripts for Persha Liha and Druha Liha A.
I would like to do the same for the standings of Druha Liha B and Vyshcha Liha as well. The results part I would not touch and in fact would like to get set up some time for both Persha Liha and Druha Liha A
Opinions? Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 15:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
About tables of results:
Third variant is difficult to realize if ch/ship is not ended. I prefer the first one (and use it in uk-wiki): it is easier to update it. But for historical championships third variant is preferrable if we use table from other web-sites.-- Ahonc ( Talk) 18:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
You may have noticed that I have started to get Druha Liha A and B in synchronization in terns of how it looks. I still need to get the results table inserted into Hrupa A. Just a quick question about the results matrix - is there a tool to generate the script to create an initial results matrix?? The manual effort to do such a matrix is painful! Also template creation is pain in the sr*ka! Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 10:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Also the standings tables are starting to evolve from the scripts that I already have for RSSSF. Generation is quite quick. There is some debate going on with some folks outside this YKPAIHIAH group. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 10:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I noticed today that someone by the name User:Fasach Nua has gone in an tagged that out list of famous players needs to be verifiable. I think this guy has a bit of a problem because I noticed on his User talk page he seems to do this all over the place. Whats our approach? All of the players are notable in terms of them being famous and that were sometimes in their careers played for the Ukrainian National Team. Or do we need a specific source ( and WP:ProveIT ) needs some English source.
I think this is a waste of time but I'll let you guys guide since you might have more experience with situations like this. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 14:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
After some discussions by the so called experts in Wiki Football they have decided that the Round by Round information in the 2008-09 Premier League is going to be deleted. Typical of goes on here in Wiki Football. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 16:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how aware you guys are of the main football WikiProject, but it occured to me that it may be in the interest of the Ukrainian football editors to join up with the football editors. You could possibly even create your own Ukrainian football taskforce that would encompass all of the same information you're handling here. I think that any time we can bring together editors it's good for WP because everyone can get on the "same page" in relation to guidelines, MoS, etc. Thoughts? JohnnyPolo24 ( talk) 17:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi all
I placed a message on all the participants pages so they would know about this
I have been doing clean-ups of the Ukrainian project pages trying to fix class/importance and realised that many of the amateur Urainian football articles are full of redlinks and some other pages have simple problems such as class/importance not added.
Can all of you on this list of participating members please have a look at
Can you all spend 10 mins every day you edit to maybe go through some of these articles please and do this ?
thanks Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed this template no longer matches the FC Lviv article's Current squad section. -- Rpyle731 talk 02:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
А що оце за халтура?
Однакові турнірні таблиці для всіх груп, тільки змінені назви команд. Треба руки повідривати тому, хто це писав, і гнати його з футбольного вікіпроекту…-- Anatoliy ( Talk) 20:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Ukraine Project‑class | |||||||
|
This area has been designated as Talk about Ukrainian Football.
In particular, any discussions on how we can make the topic of Ukrainian Football better in terms of reference with the Encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 16:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Pryvit Xloptsi!
I'm sending a query to the group of current active Wiki Ukrainian football participants about doing some editing to make some of the information more seamless. However, to do that, I really need to get your opinions because I haven't participated here for too long and I don't want to give the wrong signals and put any antagonizations amongst us - there are enough out there already.
Also I like the work that has been done here already and although there needs some solid proof reading I think that that will come.
So here is my suggestion -
One of the areas that I would like to work on is getting all the tables both historical (past seasons) and current weekly updates to be similar. One area is that Druha Liha has 2 different styles for Hrupa A and Hrup B. Of course this stems from that 2 different authors are working on this. The data seems to be ok, but the presentation is not consistent. I would like to get both Druha A and Druha B standings to be the same style. And this is where I would like a consensus to go on because these areas may be "pet projects" and I don't want to offend.
I would prefer to do the standings in the style that Alex G. has initiated them. For me its easier to convert all RSSSF standings (I'm YKPAIHA's representative and update those standings weekly http://www.rsssf.com/tableso/oekr09.html) into a text format that simply plugs in. I have scripts that already automatically do the standings update for RSSSF and I have just recently done the same kind of scripts for Persha Liha and Druha Liha A.
I would like to do the same for the standings of Druha Liha B and Vyshcha Liha as well. The results part I would not touch and in fact would like to get set up some time for both Persha Liha and Druha Liha A
Opinions? Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 15:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
About tables of results:
Third variant is difficult to realize if ch/ship is not ended. I prefer the first one (and use it in uk-wiki): it is easier to update it. But for historical championships third variant is preferrable if we use table from other web-sites.-- Ahonc ( Talk) 18:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
You may have noticed that I have started to get Druha Liha A and B in synchronization in terns of how it looks. I still need to get the results table inserted into Hrupa A. Just a quick question about the results matrix - is there a tool to generate the script to create an initial results matrix?? The manual effort to do such a matrix is painful! Also template creation is pain in the sr*ka! Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 10:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Also the standings tables are starting to evolve from the scripts that I already have for RSSSF. Generation is quite quick. There is some debate going on with some folks outside this YKPAIHIAH group. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 10:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I noticed today that someone by the name User:Fasach Nua has gone in an tagged that out list of famous players needs to be verifiable. I think this guy has a bit of a problem because I noticed on his User talk page he seems to do this all over the place. Whats our approach? All of the players are notable in terms of them being famous and that were sometimes in their careers played for the Ukrainian National Team. Or do we need a specific source ( and WP:ProveIT ) needs some English source.
I think this is a waste of time but I'll let you guys guide since you might have more experience with situations like this. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 14:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
After some discussions by the so called experts in Wiki Football they have decided that the Round by Round information in the 2008-09 Premier League is going to be deleted. Typical of goes on here in Wiki Football. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 16:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how aware you guys are of the main football WikiProject, but it occured to me that it may be in the interest of the Ukrainian football editors to join up with the football editors. You could possibly even create your own Ukrainian football taskforce that would encompass all of the same information you're handling here. I think that any time we can bring together editors it's good for WP because everyone can get on the "same page" in relation to guidelines, MoS, etc. Thoughts? JohnnyPolo24 ( talk) 17:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi all
I placed a message on all the participants pages so they would know about this
I have been doing clean-ups of the Ukrainian project pages trying to fix class/importance and realised that many of the amateur Urainian football articles are full of redlinks and some other pages have simple problems such as class/importance not added.
Can all of you on this list of participating members please have a look at
Can you all spend 10 mins every day you edit to maybe go through some of these articles please and do this ?
thanks Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed this template no longer matches the FC Lviv article's Current squad section. -- Rpyle731 talk 02:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
А що оце за халтура?
Однакові турнірні таблиці для всіх груп, тільки змінені назви команд. Треба руки повідривати тому, хто це писав, і гнати його з футбольного вікіпроекту…-- Anatoliy ( Talk) 20:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)