![]() | U.S. Roads Project‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | This project page was nominated for deletion on 24 September 2007. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. |
Is anyone allowed to adopt a highway (meaning people not members of WP:USRD)? -- Dtbohrer talk• contribs 18:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
For articles like I-95, what if we want to split it up by states or multiple states? I mean, the main article is good, but we have what, 15 articles for each state. Maybe we need a whole new page...*thought halted*...maybe one of our current lists (O's exit list, or O's Interstate status list) can double as a place where we can put names, too. That would work for Auxiliary routes, too. Thoughts? -- MPD T / C 18:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The way it appears it is set up now is that only one person can adopt an article, is it possible for multiple people to adopt the same article? -- Holderca1 20:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Only allowing one person to adopt an article is ownership of articles. -- NE2 17:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
It should be noted that the wording of Template:Maintained assumes by default multiple users. It also doesn't have a bureaucratic process behind it, so I'm going to use it. -- NE2 17:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Some of the long ones like I-90 should probably be split and done by state. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 19:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an extremely bad idea, and contrary to the goals and ideals of Wikipedia as a community project. If you care about reverting vandalism on a specific page, go ahead and stick it on your watchlist, and go ahead and revert vandalism there. There's no need for a badge proclaiming such, which strongly suggest ownership of articles. Wikipedia is a community project. K ri mp et 18:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Part of the reason that our template was deleted was because {{ maintained}} exists. It was partly seen as redundant. You can use that template on articles you have adopted in place of the deleted template. -- Holderca1 17:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I-5, 8, 10, 15? (Dang limited 15 min hotel access... -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 14:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
This section says "Add {{maintained}} to the article's talk page." However, the "maintained" does not exist. I do not see how to correct that.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 19:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | U.S. Roads Project‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | This project page was nominated for deletion on 24 September 2007. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. |
Is anyone allowed to adopt a highway (meaning people not members of WP:USRD)? -- Dtbohrer talk• contribs 18:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
For articles like I-95, what if we want to split it up by states or multiple states? I mean, the main article is good, but we have what, 15 articles for each state. Maybe we need a whole new page...*thought halted*...maybe one of our current lists (O's exit list, or O's Interstate status list) can double as a place where we can put names, too. That would work for Auxiliary routes, too. Thoughts? -- MPD T / C 18:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The way it appears it is set up now is that only one person can adopt an article, is it possible for multiple people to adopt the same article? -- Holderca1 20:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Only allowing one person to adopt an article is ownership of articles. -- NE2 17:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
It should be noted that the wording of Template:Maintained assumes by default multiple users. It also doesn't have a bureaucratic process behind it, so I'm going to use it. -- NE2 17:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Some of the long ones like I-90 should probably be split and done by state. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 19:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an extremely bad idea, and contrary to the goals and ideals of Wikipedia as a community project. If you care about reverting vandalism on a specific page, go ahead and stick it on your watchlist, and go ahead and revert vandalism there. There's no need for a badge proclaiming such, which strongly suggest ownership of articles. Wikipedia is a community project. K ri mp et 18:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Part of the reason that our template was deleted was because {{ maintained}} exists. It was partly seen as redundant. You can use that template on articles you have adopted in place of the deleted template. -- Holderca1 17:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I-5, 8, 10, 15? (Dang limited 15 min hotel access... -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 14:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
This section says "Add {{maintained}} to the article's talk page." However, the "maintained" does not exist. I do not see how to correct that.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 19:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)