The Beatles Project‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
BOLD revert discuss. I was bold, you reverted, so here I am... I think there's merit in tracking every DYK because I want this project to get a rep that whatever we nominate makes it. (I personally am batting 1000 on self authored DYK noms...) So I think there is merit in tracking WHY Capitol Mumble didn't get selected... Discuss. ++ Lar: t/ c 20:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
I thought it wouldn't be fair to claim this as a "new article" for the project, since it wasn't AFAIK created by a project member, and the Beatles involvement is peripheral. So, I'll record it here instead:
-- kingboyk 17:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
What are we going to do about new articles which were on our to-do list and which have turned blue thanks to editors not on the participants list? Do we consider those editors "honorary members" and list the articles regardless? :-) The latest example is: Liverpool College of Art. -- kingboyk 23:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
The Beatles Project‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
BOLD revert discuss. I was bold, you reverted, so here I am... I think there's merit in tracking every DYK because I want this project to get a rep that whatever we nominate makes it. (I personally am batting 1000 on self authored DYK noms...) So I think there is merit in tracking WHY Capitol Mumble didn't get selected... Discuss. ++ Lar: t/ c 20:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
I thought it wouldn't be fair to claim this as a "new article" for the project, since it wasn't AFAIK created by a project member, and the Beatles involvement is peripheral. So, I'll record it here instead:
-- kingboyk 17:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
What are we going to do about new articles which were on our to-do list and which have turned blue thanks to editors not on the participants list? Do we consider those editors "honorary members" and list the articles regardless? :-) The latest example is: Liverpool College of Art. -- kingboyk 23:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)