![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
This page is an archive of finished and abandoned discussions. Feel free to start them again in the main discussion page if you find it really necessary, but please, do not edit this page.
I see wikipedia defines some sections in Wikiproject as default. However, not all projects keep them. Which ones do you think are not usuful for us? For one, I'd delete the "Related Regional notice boards" one. Ideas? -- Andromeda 00:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Zxcvbnm deleted a bunch of sections already. I've also deleted most of the ones in the Related pages in Sister projects section, since only the Wikiquotes one has content. Deleted also "Wikipedia namespace and Meta-Wiki articles on Stargate", Related Collaborations, Related groups of Wikipedians, Wikipedia surveys, Stargate Meetups, Sister Project links and several generic, non-useful links. If anyone things I've been too generous with the delete key, feel free to revert anything. Thanks. -- Andromeda 02:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I agree about deleting sections. When I saw 30+ sections I was really taken aback. What's the difference between similar and related wikiprojects? Goasl v. projects v. tasks? Also perhaps get rid of everything below "New Wikipedia articles related to Stargate".
I agree that Character templates are a good idea. I would argue that we should also create a template for individual episodes. I went through all the season one Atlantis episodes yesterday to try to standardise them. Some didn't have an introductory sentence. Some lacked spoiler warnings, etc. We should do the same for SG-1 episodes. I'd be willing to work on this if you like. I'm also involved with Wikipedia: WikiProject Television.
Acegikmo1 00:48, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I believe we need to create an article on the storyline of Stargate SG-1. I realize we already have something similar with the Stargate SG-1 episode guide, but it is incomplete. I believe it would be much easier to break it down season by season and give a general overview of the storyline. The plot of a show is one of the most important parts, and not enough of the shows have information on the storyline and plot progression. I believe that the info for SG-1 is already much more complete than just about any other show, and this addition would make it only more complete. bob rulz 01:53, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
This is something that needs to be discussed and acted upon, and may be one of the main tasks for the project. Pages like individual episodes need to be un-stubbed and follow a decent template, and then pages on machinery and so on likewise. -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Does there need to be an article for every SG-1 and Atlantis character, or just the main ones (and if so should we delete articles on minor characters?). I think there at least need to be articles for all main characters in both series (which I'm sure there already are).
It would be harder to create predefined sections for characters I think because of their intricacies (see the Teal'c page which documents his lovelife.) -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Creator(s), Antecedent(s) (like X-302 / F-302), Owner(s), First Appearance, Appearance(s), Use(s), Extra Info (like what it's powered by, or what it goes together with). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Plot Synopsis, Notable Features (like the first appearance ever of an Asgard, etc, or of naquadria, or like there's a cameo, or something), the standard TV Episode template (see Children of the Gods (Stargate SG-1)), Follow-ups (like if the episode introduces the Kull Disruptor, it can say here that the weapon is used in future episodes X and Y, especially in Episode Z when etc...) / Conclusions (like if in a previous episode we heard all about Ascension, it can say here that in this episode, that storyline climaxes with the Ascension of character X...) -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Description, Tendencies, Alliances and Enemies, Subdivisions, First Appearance, Technology (how advanced they are), Relation (ie Jaffa are Gao'uld related, Aschen are Human-related). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I was wondering whether there should be a section of this project for major Planets as well, like Kelowna, Earth (obviously), Abydos, the fire-covered Ancients Planet... These pages would probably just have information on the population or technology, or politics (like on Kelowna), or what was found there (like the Ancients Planet). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
What about a combined list? Something like this:
Stargates situated on the Milky Way or address from the Milky Way.
Planet | SGC Designation | Stargate address | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Abydos | P8X-873 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Destroyed |
Chulak |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teal'c's homeworld |
Stargates situated on the Pegasus Galaxy or address from the Pegasus Galaxy.
Planet | SGC Designation | Stargate address | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Atlantis |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Athos |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-- Andromeda 12:46, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I was wondering what type of format we should use for Episode list. I like Enterprise's episode list. It contains a bunch of great features that would be nice to have for the 3 Stargate Series. It contains a short introduction to the series and a picture of the DVD set. The table contains a lot of useful information including a screenshot from each episode, the episode title (with a link to its page), it episode number, and its original airdate. So what do you guys think of having a similar list for the Stargate series? What type of information should we have in addition to what I have mentioned? -- Mattwj2002 01:39, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
List of Gods in Stargate or something? Well - not necessarily a list anyway. I was just thinking that it would be some rather good information on this universe to have something on the various Gods that Goa'uld and other races play in Stargate. I thought of this when looking over the main
Stargate article. All of the Gods that the show has Goa'uld's play are Gods no longer worshipped, but prominent Gods from pagan mythologies. It's an interesting addition to their lineage that their existence was explained by alien posers in a future television series.
I count so far only references to Egypt and Norse. I hear we have Celtic and Mayan too. I'll start a count here with what I can remember, and I think this info should be incorporated somehow into a page somewhere. And if we are going to have character pages for the major "Gods" (such as the ones below), a List kinda makes sense. Well... tell me what you think. --
alfakim
14:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
[deleted the list when idea became redundant]--
alfakim
12:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
This whole idea actually falls under the article System Lord. It has been suggested that lesser Gods like Nirrte have their pages merged into that article, but I still think that the major Lords should have seperate character pages (basically just Apophis, Anubis and Baal). Otherwise, that article should have info on all the System Lords and lesser Gods. Any agreement? -- alfakim 15:16, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Somewhat tangential, but I've been thinking--why can't we put the symbol of each System Lord (if it is known) with its article? Surely someone can find them somewhere. LD 16 August 2005
I was looking at List of Star Trek: Enterprise story arcs and I liked the concept of having a page that grouped the episodes by what type of concept or theme were presented in what particular episodes. For example, it might listed that such and such episodes are about the replicators, time travel, or the politics of the SGC program. What do you guys think? -- Mattwj2002 14:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
I saw the System Lord article has a list of all known System Lords. However, there are Goa'uld that aren't System Lords (Tanith comes to mind) and that haven't enough info on them to warrant their own article. Should we add them to the Goa'uld article, or perhaps it would be better to create a list of their own? Something called "Goa'uld characters in Stargate" or something like that? -- Andromeda 02:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
-- alfakim 12:27, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
or perhaps
Ok, an initial version of the list is up at the Goa'uld page. There's also a list of known Jaffa at the Jaffa article. Comments? -- Andromeda 23:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
I just noticed that you missed all the good bits on Nerus. I intend to remedy that. -- LD 01:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
For example, Daniel Jackson's article basically ends at the beginning of Season 8. I'd like to do it, but simply I don't have the time. LD 01:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Would one of you fine people be interested in adding a Stargate section to canon (fiction)? I know that the animated series isn't canon, and bits of the film have been retconned in the TV series, but I don't know anything about how books, comics, etc. are treated within Stargate fandom. I'd stub the paragraph up myself, but I know very little about Stargate fandom and would probably make some dreadful mistake. :)
Thanks in advance to whoever picks up this challenge! — Josiah Rowe 07:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
I'd like to volunteer to help out on this project. I run a stargate technology website (its linked in my profile) and have information and analysis to help add. Alyeska 19:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
-- Zxcvbnm 22:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
see title. i really dont think every page needs a see also link to every other stargate major page. those see also's pretty much get irrelevent 80% of the time.
See also sections should be strictly relevent: eg for "Daniel Jackson" article, something like: "See also: Stargate, SG-1, Ascension."
if you guys agree, i'd like to revert a lot of those additions of massive see also lists. -- Alfakim-- talk 16:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
By adding this new template to other templates, such as recuring charcters, I have able to spread it to hundereds of stargate pages. I think this template belongs on every stargate page we have. Tobyk777 05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I am overall unhappy with all of this "mass-interlinking". Why does every page need to link to every other? The "Topics in Stargate" template is woefully inadequate to capture the topics in Stargate; it seems like more of an "Obscure Articles in Stargate" template. Pages automatically interlink anyway, because every article has a whole load of internal links. You don't need a list of irrelevent links anywhere on a page. If necessary, there can be ONE See also link: "Stargate topics", which then takes you to the page that lists all the articles. -- Alfakim-- talk 13:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I just did a rework of the article Death glider. I found the orginal hard to read, messy unorganized, and not wikified. I think I fixed all the problems with it. I know I have gotten criticism here lately so I just want to see what you guys think. Tobyk777 23:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I think we need a atandard form for the devices and technology articeles, especially the intro section. I propose something similar to the following:
This information may not be available in all cases, but we should at leat put in as much as possible.
SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 00:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Converting tech articles to this fromat would require us to completely rewrite almost every one. It would be better your way, but I think it's good enough as it is, and would be too hard to convert them all. Tobyk777 05:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sandbox/Wikistory/Stargate
On a lighter note everyone, join in with this!
Hi after I just spent 2 hours linking and organizing pages on stargate I realized that their was a Stargate project. I just joined, yet in my time organing the database, I saw that all the Stargate ones are jumbled. I think Every charcter page needs the charcter template, every tech page the tech template, etc. Also the templates themselves are not complete. I spent hours working on these problems today, but it's more than one person can do.
What I did that was good but people need to do a lot more of:
Our Stargate database is thurough, it just isn't organized. Every page needs to be catagorized, and every page needs to link to every relevant page, as well as the main lists. Every page also needs it's apropiate template, and the templates needs to be complete.
I will continue working on these problems, but I need help. Thanks Tobyk777 03:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
After editing Telchak, I realized that I had edited a very similar article before. I turns out that Telchak and Telchak (Stargate) Are almost identical. I am not sure how this duplication was created. they should be merged and one should be redirected into the other. I am not sure how to form redirects myself, so I am putting it here, requesting that someone else does. Tobyk777 02:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I have added the merge tag for both articles, so it should be taken care of soon.
( Opes 03:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC))
Since Doci is a stub, and the Doci are stated as being leaders of the Priors in the Ori article; I suggest that the Doci article be merged with the Prior article, then the Doci article should be deleted.
Lady Aleena 23:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
First, THANK YOU CANADIANS for this heads-up. Somehow, I think we should reorganize these articles along the lines of Daedalus class battlecruiser, with general information about the type of ships (very large, high-quality self-destruct, stasis pods with virtual-environment capability, used Drone Weapons, etc.), and then each individual ship's story. The ideal place for this would be as Aurora-class Battleship. Comments? Lockesdonkey 21:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I think that Flames of Enlightenment should be merged into the Ori article, since it is only a stub and the Flames are the Ori themself. Diabound00 13:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive V #How_about:_Sectioning_off_of.2Fpossible_banning_of_Fictional_Universe_articles. I hope I am not in violation of WP:SPAM by informing talk pages of Fictional Universes about this thread. User:AlMac| (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Rand and Caledonia have a planet name...Tegalas (my spelling may be wrong).
Lady Aleena 01:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Some people without real understanding of the template vote to delete it. As that is our topic I think we should participate in that decision and not let people who do not work on this WP decide. -- SoWhy 21:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
This page is an archive of finished and abandoned discussions. Feel free to start them again in the main discussion page if you find it really necessary, but please, do not edit this page.
I see wikipedia defines some sections in Wikiproject as default. However, not all projects keep them. Which ones do you think are not usuful for us? For one, I'd delete the "Related Regional notice boards" one. Ideas? -- Andromeda 00:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Zxcvbnm deleted a bunch of sections already. I've also deleted most of the ones in the Related pages in Sister projects section, since only the Wikiquotes one has content. Deleted also "Wikipedia namespace and Meta-Wiki articles on Stargate", Related Collaborations, Related groups of Wikipedians, Wikipedia surveys, Stargate Meetups, Sister Project links and several generic, non-useful links. If anyone things I've been too generous with the delete key, feel free to revert anything. Thanks. -- Andromeda 02:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I agree about deleting sections. When I saw 30+ sections I was really taken aback. What's the difference between similar and related wikiprojects? Goasl v. projects v. tasks? Also perhaps get rid of everything below "New Wikipedia articles related to Stargate".
I agree that Character templates are a good idea. I would argue that we should also create a template for individual episodes. I went through all the season one Atlantis episodes yesterday to try to standardise them. Some didn't have an introductory sentence. Some lacked spoiler warnings, etc. We should do the same for SG-1 episodes. I'd be willing to work on this if you like. I'm also involved with Wikipedia: WikiProject Television.
Acegikmo1 00:48, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I believe we need to create an article on the storyline of Stargate SG-1. I realize we already have something similar with the Stargate SG-1 episode guide, but it is incomplete. I believe it would be much easier to break it down season by season and give a general overview of the storyline. The plot of a show is one of the most important parts, and not enough of the shows have information on the storyline and plot progression. I believe that the info for SG-1 is already much more complete than just about any other show, and this addition would make it only more complete. bob rulz 01:53, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
This is something that needs to be discussed and acted upon, and may be one of the main tasks for the project. Pages like individual episodes need to be un-stubbed and follow a decent template, and then pages on machinery and so on likewise. -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Does there need to be an article for every SG-1 and Atlantis character, or just the main ones (and if so should we delete articles on minor characters?). I think there at least need to be articles for all main characters in both series (which I'm sure there already are).
It would be harder to create predefined sections for characters I think because of their intricacies (see the Teal'c page which documents his lovelife.) -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Creator(s), Antecedent(s) (like X-302 / F-302), Owner(s), First Appearance, Appearance(s), Use(s), Extra Info (like what it's powered by, or what it goes together with). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Plot Synopsis, Notable Features (like the first appearance ever of an Asgard, etc, or of naquadria, or like there's a cameo, or something), the standard TV Episode template (see Children of the Gods (Stargate SG-1)), Follow-ups (like if the episode introduces the Kull Disruptor, it can say here that the weapon is used in future episodes X and Y, especially in Episode Z when etc...) / Conclusions (like if in a previous episode we heard all about Ascension, it can say here that in this episode, that storyline climaxes with the Ascension of character X...) -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Sections in this type of article will probably be like:
Description, Tendencies, Alliances and Enemies, Subdivisions, First Appearance, Technology (how advanced they are), Relation (ie Jaffa are Gao'uld related, Aschen are Human-related). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I was wondering whether there should be a section of this project for major Planets as well, like Kelowna, Earth (obviously), Abydos, the fire-covered Ancients Planet... These pages would probably just have information on the population or technology, or politics (like on Kelowna), or what was found there (like the Ancients Planet). -- alfakim 16:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
What about a combined list? Something like this:
Stargates situated on the Milky Way or address from the Milky Way.
Planet | SGC Designation | Stargate address | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Abydos | P8X-873 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Destroyed |
Chulak |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teal'c's homeworld |
Stargates situated on the Pegasus Galaxy or address from the Pegasus Galaxy.
Planet | SGC Designation | Stargate address | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Atlantis |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Athos |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-- Andromeda 12:46, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I was wondering what type of format we should use for Episode list. I like Enterprise's episode list. It contains a bunch of great features that would be nice to have for the 3 Stargate Series. It contains a short introduction to the series and a picture of the DVD set. The table contains a lot of useful information including a screenshot from each episode, the episode title (with a link to its page), it episode number, and its original airdate. So what do you guys think of having a similar list for the Stargate series? What type of information should we have in addition to what I have mentioned? -- Mattwj2002 01:39, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
List of Gods in Stargate or something? Well - not necessarily a list anyway. I was just thinking that it would be some rather good information on this universe to have something on the various Gods that Goa'uld and other races play in Stargate. I thought of this when looking over the main
Stargate article. All of the Gods that the show has Goa'uld's play are Gods no longer worshipped, but prominent Gods from pagan mythologies. It's an interesting addition to their lineage that their existence was explained by alien posers in a future television series.
I count so far only references to Egypt and Norse. I hear we have Celtic and Mayan too. I'll start a count here with what I can remember, and I think this info should be incorporated somehow into a page somewhere. And if we are going to have character pages for the major "Gods" (such as the ones below), a List kinda makes sense. Well... tell me what you think. --
alfakim
14:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
[deleted the list when idea became redundant]--
alfakim
12:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
This whole idea actually falls under the article System Lord. It has been suggested that lesser Gods like Nirrte have their pages merged into that article, but I still think that the major Lords should have seperate character pages (basically just Apophis, Anubis and Baal). Otherwise, that article should have info on all the System Lords and lesser Gods. Any agreement? -- alfakim 15:16, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Somewhat tangential, but I've been thinking--why can't we put the symbol of each System Lord (if it is known) with its article? Surely someone can find them somewhere. LD 16 August 2005
I was looking at List of Star Trek: Enterprise story arcs and I liked the concept of having a page that grouped the episodes by what type of concept or theme were presented in what particular episodes. For example, it might listed that such and such episodes are about the replicators, time travel, or the politics of the SGC program. What do you guys think? -- Mattwj2002 14:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
I saw the System Lord article has a list of all known System Lords. However, there are Goa'uld that aren't System Lords (Tanith comes to mind) and that haven't enough info on them to warrant their own article. Should we add them to the Goa'uld article, or perhaps it would be better to create a list of their own? Something called "Goa'uld characters in Stargate" or something like that? -- Andromeda 02:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
-- alfakim 12:27, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
or perhaps
Ok, an initial version of the list is up at the Goa'uld page. There's also a list of known Jaffa at the Jaffa article. Comments? -- Andromeda 23:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
I just noticed that you missed all the good bits on Nerus. I intend to remedy that. -- LD 01:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
For example, Daniel Jackson's article basically ends at the beginning of Season 8. I'd like to do it, but simply I don't have the time. LD 01:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Would one of you fine people be interested in adding a Stargate section to canon (fiction)? I know that the animated series isn't canon, and bits of the film have been retconned in the TV series, but I don't know anything about how books, comics, etc. are treated within Stargate fandom. I'd stub the paragraph up myself, but I know very little about Stargate fandom and would probably make some dreadful mistake. :)
Thanks in advance to whoever picks up this challenge! — Josiah Rowe 07:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
I'd like to volunteer to help out on this project. I run a stargate technology website (its linked in my profile) and have information and analysis to help add. Alyeska 19:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
-- Zxcvbnm 22:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
see title. i really dont think every page needs a see also link to every other stargate major page. those see also's pretty much get irrelevent 80% of the time.
See also sections should be strictly relevent: eg for "Daniel Jackson" article, something like: "See also: Stargate, SG-1, Ascension."
if you guys agree, i'd like to revert a lot of those additions of massive see also lists. -- Alfakim-- talk 16:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
By adding this new template to other templates, such as recuring charcters, I have able to spread it to hundereds of stargate pages. I think this template belongs on every stargate page we have. Tobyk777 05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I am overall unhappy with all of this "mass-interlinking". Why does every page need to link to every other? The "Topics in Stargate" template is woefully inadequate to capture the topics in Stargate; it seems like more of an "Obscure Articles in Stargate" template. Pages automatically interlink anyway, because every article has a whole load of internal links. You don't need a list of irrelevent links anywhere on a page. If necessary, there can be ONE See also link: "Stargate topics", which then takes you to the page that lists all the articles. -- Alfakim-- talk 13:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I just did a rework of the article Death glider. I found the orginal hard to read, messy unorganized, and not wikified. I think I fixed all the problems with it. I know I have gotten criticism here lately so I just want to see what you guys think. Tobyk777 23:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I think we need a atandard form for the devices and technology articeles, especially the intro section. I propose something similar to the following:
This information may not be available in all cases, but we should at leat put in as much as possible.
SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 00:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Converting tech articles to this fromat would require us to completely rewrite almost every one. It would be better your way, but I think it's good enough as it is, and would be too hard to convert them all. Tobyk777 05:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sandbox/Wikistory/Stargate
On a lighter note everyone, join in with this!
Hi after I just spent 2 hours linking and organizing pages on stargate I realized that their was a Stargate project. I just joined, yet in my time organing the database, I saw that all the Stargate ones are jumbled. I think Every charcter page needs the charcter template, every tech page the tech template, etc. Also the templates themselves are not complete. I spent hours working on these problems today, but it's more than one person can do.
What I did that was good but people need to do a lot more of:
Our Stargate database is thurough, it just isn't organized. Every page needs to be catagorized, and every page needs to link to every relevant page, as well as the main lists. Every page also needs it's apropiate template, and the templates needs to be complete.
I will continue working on these problems, but I need help. Thanks Tobyk777 03:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
After editing Telchak, I realized that I had edited a very similar article before. I turns out that Telchak and Telchak (Stargate) Are almost identical. I am not sure how this duplication was created. they should be merged and one should be redirected into the other. I am not sure how to form redirects myself, so I am putting it here, requesting that someone else does. Tobyk777 02:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I have added the merge tag for both articles, so it should be taken care of soon.
( Opes 03:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC))
Since Doci is a stub, and the Doci are stated as being leaders of the Priors in the Ori article; I suggest that the Doci article be merged with the Prior article, then the Doci article should be deleted.
Lady Aleena 23:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
First, THANK YOU CANADIANS for this heads-up. Somehow, I think we should reorganize these articles along the lines of Daedalus class battlecruiser, with general information about the type of ships (very large, high-quality self-destruct, stasis pods with virtual-environment capability, used Drone Weapons, etc.), and then each individual ship's story. The ideal place for this would be as Aurora-class Battleship. Comments? Lockesdonkey 21:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I think that Flames of Enlightenment should be merged into the Ori article, since it is only a stub and the Flames are the Ori themself. Diabound00 13:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive V #How_about:_Sectioning_off_of.2Fpossible_banning_of_Fictional_Universe_articles. I hope I am not in violation of WP:SPAM by informing talk pages of Fictional Universes about this thread. User:AlMac| (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Rand and Caledonia have a planet name...Tegalas (my spelling may be wrong).
Lady Aleena 01:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Some people without real understanding of the template vote to delete it. As that is our topic I think we should participate in that decision and not let people who do not work on this WP decide. -- SoWhy 21:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)