![]() | Television: Hollyoaks Project‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 03:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
GA on hold — Notes left on
talk page.
Frickative
11:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Hollyoaks articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
There is a discussion Here about the use of screens shots in character articles, we need more views, to see what the consensus is. RAIN*the*ONE BAM 15:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Both have their own pages now with only a few sources and are using non free promotional images. Should they be redirected back to the lists? Hope someone sees this anyway D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Proposing redirect of Gina, Kate and Sol Patrick. Only one is images and the rest aren't and none are sourced. They haven't been edited since November 2010. What does everyone else think. Alot of earlier HO articles are unsourced aswell. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
So before i start looking apart from the Patricks who else should we be looking for? Should we make a list or just find anything and then add it to the appropriate articles? D4nnyw14 ( talk) 16:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Just checking that Finn can be merged back to the list. We all agreed on but it was never moved. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 13:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Brought this here although i'm not sure anyone will see it but alot of the durations of characters seem to mismatch. E.g. Ruth Osborne says she's been there since episode one but in this interview Dwyer says since almost the start and Lewis Richardson says since 1997 but in this interview Ben Hull says he has been there since it was one episode and the reported mentions that he's been there since episode 3. Is anyone still here who has been watchin since the start of the show who might have a clearer idea on duration? Hope someone see's this anyway thanks D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Hollyoaks to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hollyoaks/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr. Z-man 23:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I've opened this discussion to talk about what needs to be done within the project. I think some pages need redirecting to lists while others need splitting from lists. Lewis was in Hollyoaks for 5-6 years and doesn't have his own page while a few other long term characters who are notable don't. I think a few more recent additions could probably be split aswell such as Jamil and Ethan although there both gone now. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 21:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Had no idea george was so notable! That is really good, I think with a few more sources george could be the next candidate for splitting of the teens. Is there anyone else who needs a section? I'll have to look through the lists. Another thing that needs doing is so that everyoone from the past cast list is linked somewhere which I'll do soon. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 22:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, sorry for not joining in earlier. Just been reading the discussion and theres some very good points made. Also, I was thinking about maybe making George's article Rain, if that would be okay with you, I mean I don't want to step on your toes or anything. :) Oh and I also have a few points to make too. I was thinking that Amber and Finn (maybe Gabby aswell) should be moved back to the 2010 list, don't know what you guys think? Btw, do you both like Ruby's article I created? :)-- AcidBrights ( talk) 23:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hopefully if I can maybe George because I really like the character and his storyline. :) I also want to try and sort out Lynsey's article you see when I first started editing in early 2010, I wasn't exactly the best editor and basically some of my stuff was crap, but I am hopefully much better now.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 00:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I didn't mean create an article for George now, just start creating in sandbox and build it up continually. And yeah we do need to discuss the storylines thing because I've really just started putting the section before all the others because EE did it with theirs. Now, sourcing the plot is a tricky one, because again I just started doing it because I noticed EE and Holby City articles starting to have refs in storyline section so I just thought I should do it, but i'm fine not doing it aswell. :)-- AcidBrights ( talk) 01:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay, i've removed refs from ruby's storylines section and moved the section below development. :) I agree with you because to be honest, I never understood why storyline section had to go first.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 11:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
No, Malachy's mother Erin told her she was not invited to the funeral and she didn't go. However, she did visit his grave in Belfast in February 2011.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 15:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
I've started a new section to make it easier to follow. I'm not sure we should even use the old header - they're jumbled up - We need to completely forget the old article to make this work. Like it we are creating a new article. I've long known that the infobox is actually a box of lies - but never done anything about it. So I think that needs to be the starting point. Can you spot any of the false information? Rain the 1 18:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Well there is no mention of Mersey TV in the infobox, it is recentism because Lime Pictures is the same company, but it is owned by All3media - where as before they were their own boss. (If you get me) So the end result has the general reader assuming that All3Media and Lime have always produced and distributed it. The editors doesn't sit well because David Hutchman edited the show the other night, and someone else before.. the same with the directors - there is no set one and these things change - because it is behind the scenes and we will only know when the episode airs - there is no fact because it is forever changing. With a producer or even executive producer - we know about it and have sources to prove it. The run time - now I know when it is nearly 25 past 7 on E4, I think the titles are going to roll in a second. It does not last half an hour because of adverts. I think whoever added that though because of adverts it must last 25 minutes. It never goes of exactly after half an hour with adverts, so it has to be much less. An episode of Hollyoaks never lasts more than 24 minutes - if you look at youtube - [3] all episode last over 23 minutes but not 24. So would 23 minutes be a fair time to replace 25 minutes?
So some quick changes could be
Those are just some quick fixes that jump out at me. Rain the 1 18:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Whats next now? D4nnyw14 ( talk) 23:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
As a popular character who has been on Hollyoaks for two years (2011-2013), I believe it would be a good idea for Annalise Appleton to recieve her own article. However, I am new to Wikipedia and would like a more experienced editor`s opinion on whether this would be a good idea. Jackedano ( talk) 21:59, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot ( talk) (for Mr. Z-man) 05:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej ( talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej ( talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that some older editors here have gone inactive and rather than letting their drafts languish, I've been moving them to draftspace under Category:Draft-Class Hollyoaks articles. Note that the ones with an AFC banner are subject to WP:G13 if they aren't edited for six months (but they can be WP:REFUNDED). -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Greetings WikiProject Television/Hollyoaks task force Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Hollyoaks task force/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Television.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Television, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. – sgeureka t• c 12:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to close inactive task forces, including this one. Gonnym ( talk) 12:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Television: Hollyoaks Project‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 03:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
GA on hold — Notes left on
talk page.
Frickative
11:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Hollyoaks articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
There is a discussion Here about the use of screens shots in character articles, we need more views, to see what the consensus is. RAIN*the*ONE BAM 15:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Both have their own pages now with only a few sources and are using non free promotional images. Should they be redirected back to the lists? Hope someone sees this anyway D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Proposing redirect of Gina, Kate and Sol Patrick. Only one is images and the rest aren't and none are sourced. They haven't been edited since November 2010. What does everyone else think. Alot of earlier HO articles are unsourced aswell. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
So before i start looking apart from the Patricks who else should we be looking for? Should we make a list or just find anything and then add it to the appropriate articles? D4nnyw14 ( talk) 16:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Just checking that Finn can be merged back to the list. We all agreed on but it was never moved. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 13:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Brought this here although i'm not sure anyone will see it but alot of the durations of characters seem to mismatch. E.g. Ruth Osborne says she's been there since episode one but in this interview Dwyer says since almost the start and Lewis Richardson says since 1997 but in this interview Ben Hull says he has been there since it was one episode and the reported mentions that he's been there since episode 3. Is anyone still here who has been watchin since the start of the show who might have a clearer idea on duration? Hope someone see's this anyway thanks D4nnyw14 ( talk) 12:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Hollyoaks to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hollyoaks/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr. Z-man 23:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I've opened this discussion to talk about what needs to be done within the project. I think some pages need redirecting to lists while others need splitting from lists. Lewis was in Hollyoaks for 5-6 years and doesn't have his own page while a few other long term characters who are notable don't. I think a few more recent additions could probably be split aswell such as Jamil and Ethan although there both gone now. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 21:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Had no idea george was so notable! That is really good, I think with a few more sources george could be the next candidate for splitting of the teens. Is there anyone else who needs a section? I'll have to look through the lists. Another thing that needs doing is so that everyoone from the past cast list is linked somewhere which I'll do soon. D4nnyw14 ( talk) 22:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, sorry for not joining in earlier. Just been reading the discussion and theres some very good points made. Also, I was thinking about maybe making George's article Rain, if that would be okay with you, I mean I don't want to step on your toes or anything. :) Oh and I also have a few points to make too. I was thinking that Amber and Finn (maybe Gabby aswell) should be moved back to the 2010 list, don't know what you guys think? Btw, do you both like Ruby's article I created? :)-- AcidBrights ( talk) 23:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hopefully if I can maybe George because I really like the character and his storyline. :) I also want to try and sort out Lynsey's article you see when I first started editing in early 2010, I wasn't exactly the best editor and basically some of my stuff was crap, but I am hopefully much better now.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 00:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I didn't mean create an article for George now, just start creating in sandbox and build it up continually. And yeah we do need to discuss the storylines thing because I've really just started putting the section before all the others because EE did it with theirs. Now, sourcing the plot is a tricky one, because again I just started doing it because I noticed EE and Holby City articles starting to have refs in storyline section so I just thought I should do it, but i'm fine not doing it aswell. :)-- AcidBrights ( talk) 01:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay, i've removed refs from ruby's storylines section and moved the section below development. :) I agree with you because to be honest, I never understood why storyline section had to go first.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 11:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
No, Malachy's mother Erin told her she was not invited to the funeral and she didn't go. However, she did visit his grave in Belfast in February 2011.-- AcidBrights ( talk) 15:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
I've started a new section to make it easier to follow. I'm not sure we should even use the old header - they're jumbled up - We need to completely forget the old article to make this work. Like it we are creating a new article. I've long known that the infobox is actually a box of lies - but never done anything about it. So I think that needs to be the starting point. Can you spot any of the false information? Rain the 1 18:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Well there is no mention of Mersey TV in the infobox, it is recentism because Lime Pictures is the same company, but it is owned by All3media - where as before they were their own boss. (If you get me) So the end result has the general reader assuming that All3Media and Lime have always produced and distributed it. The editors doesn't sit well because David Hutchman edited the show the other night, and someone else before.. the same with the directors - there is no set one and these things change - because it is behind the scenes and we will only know when the episode airs - there is no fact because it is forever changing. With a producer or even executive producer - we know about it and have sources to prove it. The run time - now I know when it is nearly 25 past 7 on E4, I think the titles are going to roll in a second. It does not last half an hour because of adverts. I think whoever added that though because of adverts it must last 25 minutes. It never goes of exactly after half an hour with adverts, so it has to be much less. An episode of Hollyoaks never lasts more than 24 minutes - if you look at youtube - [3] all episode last over 23 minutes but not 24. So would 23 minutes be a fair time to replace 25 minutes?
So some quick changes could be
Those are just some quick fixes that jump out at me. Rain the 1 18:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Whats next now? D4nnyw14 ( talk) 23:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
As a popular character who has been on Hollyoaks for two years (2011-2013), I believe it would be a good idea for Annalise Appleton to recieve her own article. However, I am new to Wikipedia and would like a more experienced editor`s opinion on whether this would be a good idea. Jackedano ( talk) 21:59, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot ( talk) (for Mr. Z-man) 05:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej ( talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej ( talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that some older editors here have gone inactive and rather than letting their drafts languish, I've been moving them to draftspace under Category:Draft-Class Hollyoaks articles. Note that the ones with an AFC banner are subject to WP:G13 if they aren't edited for six months (but they can be WP:REFUNDED). -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Greetings WikiProject Television/Hollyoaks task force Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Hollyoaks task force/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Television.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Television, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. – sgeureka t• c 12:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to close inactive task forces, including this one. Gonnym ( talk) 12:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)