This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Television/Emmerdale task force page. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | Television: Emmerdale Project‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Just in case anybody wonders why I'm suddenly assessing lots of articles, it's because I'm working on getting all of the unassessed articles assessed. There are currently 436, so it may take a while, but it needs doing in order to know what needs work. – DarkGlow • 20:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Please examine the edits made by Blanchey. I don't watch the show but I think a large number of name and place changes are suspicious. Aithus ( talk) 13:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Bungle: and @ DarkGlow: Thank you for your explanation. Sorry for the false alarm. Aithus ( talk) 23:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I have recently noticed that many Emmerdale characters list the producers as their introducers rather than the executive producers (eg Meena Jutla having Kate Brooks and Laura Shaw listed under introducer rather than Jane Hudson). This rule comes under the infobox documentation so should be followed; it's a fairly easy task to fix but could be quite time consuming. Emmerdale is quite an oddity in that there were some periods with no execs credited, to which I would say "introducer" should be removed from said years' infoboxes, with the incorrect ones amending. – DarkGlow • 23:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, following issues with consistency on all the yearly character articles, I was wondering if anyone would be willing to help me. I would like all articles’ other characters box to be consistent, the colouring needs to be grey like it is on more recent year articles and the size need to be the same as the one on
List of Emmerdale characters (2022) per
MOS:SMALLTEXT. I also need the actors first name to only be mentioned once in the other characters box per another mos. (E.g. if Cain Dingle was mentioned, the first time it would look like ‘
Cain Dingle (
Jeff Hordley)’ and from then onwards, it would only have to look like ‘Cain (Hordley)’ and links would not be required either. I would love to hear your thoughts on this. @
DarkGlow: has stated that he would be happy to help as well. Thank you
Blanchey (
talk) 20:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, I guess that this can be a trial to see how it goes and if you’d be willing to use it on all of them
Blanchey (
talk) 20:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Potts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
(Oinkers42) ( talk) 03:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm aware there is little to no activity on here lately, but thought I'd post an update just in case. I've cleared the stub category, so focus should now be on improving start-class articles. – Meena • 11:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Television/Emmerdale task force page. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | Television: Emmerdale Project‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Just in case anybody wonders why I'm suddenly assessing lots of articles, it's because I'm working on getting all of the unassessed articles assessed. There are currently 436, so it may take a while, but it needs doing in order to know what needs work. – DarkGlow • 20:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Please examine the edits made by Blanchey. I don't watch the show but I think a large number of name and place changes are suspicious. Aithus ( talk) 13:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Bungle: and @ DarkGlow: Thank you for your explanation. Sorry for the false alarm. Aithus ( talk) 23:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I have recently noticed that many Emmerdale characters list the producers as their introducers rather than the executive producers (eg Meena Jutla having Kate Brooks and Laura Shaw listed under introducer rather than Jane Hudson). This rule comes under the infobox documentation so should be followed; it's a fairly easy task to fix but could be quite time consuming. Emmerdale is quite an oddity in that there were some periods with no execs credited, to which I would say "introducer" should be removed from said years' infoboxes, with the incorrect ones amending. – DarkGlow • 23:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, following issues with consistency on all the yearly character articles, I was wondering if anyone would be willing to help me. I would like all articles’ other characters box to be consistent, the colouring needs to be grey like it is on more recent year articles and the size need to be the same as the one on
List of Emmerdale characters (2022) per
MOS:SMALLTEXT. I also need the actors first name to only be mentioned once in the other characters box per another mos. (E.g. if Cain Dingle was mentioned, the first time it would look like ‘
Cain Dingle (
Jeff Hordley)’ and from then onwards, it would only have to look like ‘Cain (Hordley)’ and links would not be required either. I would love to hear your thoughts on this. @
DarkGlow: has stated that he would be happy to help as well. Thank you
Blanchey (
talk) 20:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, I guess that this can be a trial to see how it goes and if you’d be willing to use it on all of them
Blanchey (
talk) 20:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Potts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
(Oinkers42) ( talk) 03:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm aware there is little to no activity on here lately, but thought I'd post an update just in case. I've cleared the stub category, so focus should now be on improving start-class articles. – Meena • 11:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)