![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() | Star Wars Project‑class | |||||||||||||
|
This features defenitely would be a fun part of this project to add. If we were to do it, I think it should work like this: We pick couple articles a day (SW related) and as a community read them over. We make a peer review for the page of all the things than can be improved and vote on a score. Tutmosis 00:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
A good process is to:
Deckiller 04:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Ive broken off the main part of Palpatines appearance into another article ( Debate over Palpatine's appearance). I have no clue what to make links in it. Could someone else help with that? Thanks. American Patriot 1776 22:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Taking out that one small section shaved off 3 KBs of the article. All we have to do is make the article smaller and it'll pass FAC easily.
I found this article on Special:Newpages. It seems to be about Star Wars. I don't know how important it is nor do I understand the copyright status of the source site, so I thought I'd list it here for the Star Wars experts. Please take a look. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 05:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Simple question: Do the standard rules of writing such as npov apply to plot summaries? Or is it genuine for a plot summary to express the same point of view displayed in the movie/book? Tutmosis 02:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Why do some Star Wars related articles such as Boba Fett and Republic Commando not have the Wikiproject Star Wars template listed on their talk pages? Is something that just hasn't been done yet due to the large number of SW related articles or are these purposeful omissions? Thanks.
Training remote
Should we keep that or change it into a more general entry? If you do not what I am talking about, a training remote is a specific type of a remote(flying helper droid). Should we keep this specific entry or change it to a more general: just Remote.
also see Wookiepedia entry.
Tutmosis
04:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Currently we only have training remote. Shouldnt we instead have just the general description of what an all purpose remote is?...instead of one specific description...
On the article ranged weapons it only talks about specific jedi training remotes. Shouldnt we instead have a description of what a general remote is?...
Tutmosis
23:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Template:SW Craft. I find that most of the older vehicle articles have state the hyperdrive specification on their tables. Since i converted a few articles to the new template I had to remove any mention of the hyperdrive since it is not featured in the infobox/template. Should we insert hyperdrive specification into the template? Tutmosis 00:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Is their an article listing new fictional concepts/measurements Star Wars introduced or might I recommend making such a page and merging related existing small articles into it such as MGLT. Tutmosis 00:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Ive put up a peer review request for Palpatine to get some fresh ideas on what to trim down. If yall cold help that would be great! American Patriot 1776 01:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Now most star wars articles have a specific background behind the name if they have an infobox. Example would be that the Jedi have a blue background color under their name while the Sith have black. I am not trying to change this but agree on a specific standard. The following is a list of different articles I think should have a specific color in them.
Characters:
Wars:
Battles:
Organization:
Feel free to suggest any other articles that have an infobox. This can also be used for the upcoming (hopefully) Manual of Style. So tell me the color you guys want for each, even if its the color the articles are using now just say so. This is mainly for a decided upon standard although there is one already, its just invisible. Tutmosis 03:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't think we need the alien race color - don't nearly all aliens fall into the other catagories? And I could easily code this into a few Star-Wars character/vehicle templates so that a parameter (jedi/neutral...) could determine the color - rather than hand typing a color code each time. - Xol 03:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I have suggested a merge please respond at Template talk:Campaignbox Clone Wars (21.6-19 BBY). Jedi6 -(need help?) 06:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I created a infobox for Star Wars books at Template:Infobox SW Books. Jedi6 -(need help?) 22:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Should we implement a news section on the main page? I think it would be intresting telling what the Wikiproject is up to or currently has done. Tutmosis 03:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I've been thinking about expanding the stub template into several variations. We could have a book stub, character stub, etc. That way the stub category could be collected into several types. And if none of the specialized stubs work you could just use the normal stub for a general purpose. What does everyone think? Jedi6 -(need help?) 23:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
The source of this page is SuperShadow, which is famous for releasing false informations. Joppyhoppy 11:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
I have added Versions and Related Books sections to that article. Versions lists the two original books, and the Related Books lists other books directly related to this book.
Each book information is listed in the following order: Author, Name, Year published, Isbn code, publisher, book type
Do you guys like this or should my changes be reverted? Also regarding the infobox, Which one of the original books specifications should go into the infobox? The first entry appears to be the pure original. The second books seems to be a reprint by another company.
Tutmosis
18:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
As you can see above, the template merged The Thrawn Trilogy and The Hand of Thrawn duology series of books together. It also lists books that are not even part of this 2 series such as the upcoming Allegiance (novel). Does anyone else think this template needs some clean up and structure? Tutmosis 01:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
In less than two months we managed to get over 50 participants. We are now the fourth biggest WikiProject in the Entertainment catergory. We are right after Doctor Who, Anime and manga, and Films. Go us!!! Jedi6 -(need help?) 00:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
SPPs are common in gaming articles (for example, "You can go to the top and defeat the boss there.") In reality, this should be changed to "one" or "the player" or "the character" or whatever. Here is a google search: [1] Deckiller 21:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Star wars game articles, such as Star Wars: Battlefront, have excess game information. Wikipedia is not a game guide; this information should be the subject of a transwiki. Deckiller 21:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
To make it easier to navigate, I'm thinking about using the todo's talk page like the Final Fantasy wikiproject: discussions on the todo list items (outside of some minor comments) will go there, and be archived upon completion. Deckiller 18:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() | Star Wars Project‑class | |||||||||||||
|
This features defenitely would be a fun part of this project to add. If we were to do it, I think it should work like this: We pick couple articles a day (SW related) and as a community read them over. We make a peer review for the page of all the things than can be improved and vote on a score. Tutmosis 00:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
A good process is to:
Deckiller 04:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Ive broken off the main part of Palpatines appearance into another article ( Debate over Palpatine's appearance). I have no clue what to make links in it. Could someone else help with that? Thanks. American Patriot 1776 22:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Taking out that one small section shaved off 3 KBs of the article. All we have to do is make the article smaller and it'll pass FAC easily.
I found this article on Special:Newpages. It seems to be about Star Wars. I don't know how important it is nor do I understand the copyright status of the source site, so I thought I'd list it here for the Star Wars experts. Please take a look. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 05:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Simple question: Do the standard rules of writing such as npov apply to plot summaries? Or is it genuine for a plot summary to express the same point of view displayed in the movie/book? Tutmosis 02:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Why do some Star Wars related articles such as Boba Fett and Republic Commando not have the Wikiproject Star Wars template listed on their talk pages? Is something that just hasn't been done yet due to the large number of SW related articles or are these purposeful omissions? Thanks.
Training remote
Should we keep that or change it into a more general entry? If you do not what I am talking about, a training remote is a specific type of a remote(flying helper droid). Should we keep this specific entry or change it to a more general: just Remote.
also see Wookiepedia entry.
Tutmosis
04:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Currently we only have training remote. Shouldnt we instead have just the general description of what an all purpose remote is?...instead of one specific description...
On the article ranged weapons it only talks about specific jedi training remotes. Shouldnt we instead have a description of what a general remote is?...
Tutmosis
23:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Template:SW Craft. I find that most of the older vehicle articles have state the hyperdrive specification on their tables. Since i converted a few articles to the new template I had to remove any mention of the hyperdrive since it is not featured in the infobox/template. Should we insert hyperdrive specification into the template? Tutmosis 00:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Is their an article listing new fictional concepts/measurements Star Wars introduced or might I recommend making such a page and merging related existing small articles into it such as MGLT. Tutmosis 00:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Ive put up a peer review request for Palpatine to get some fresh ideas on what to trim down. If yall cold help that would be great! American Patriot 1776 01:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Now most star wars articles have a specific background behind the name if they have an infobox. Example would be that the Jedi have a blue background color under their name while the Sith have black. I am not trying to change this but agree on a specific standard. The following is a list of different articles I think should have a specific color in them.
Characters:
Wars:
Battles:
Organization:
Feel free to suggest any other articles that have an infobox. This can also be used for the upcoming (hopefully) Manual of Style. So tell me the color you guys want for each, even if its the color the articles are using now just say so. This is mainly for a decided upon standard although there is one already, its just invisible. Tutmosis 03:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't think we need the alien race color - don't nearly all aliens fall into the other catagories? And I could easily code this into a few Star-Wars character/vehicle templates so that a parameter (jedi/neutral...) could determine the color - rather than hand typing a color code each time. - Xol 03:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I have suggested a merge please respond at Template talk:Campaignbox Clone Wars (21.6-19 BBY). Jedi6 -(need help?) 06:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I created a infobox for Star Wars books at Template:Infobox SW Books. Jedi6 -(need help?) 22:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Should we implement a news section on the main page? I think it would be intresting telling what the Wikiproject is up to or currently has done. Tutmosis 03:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I've been thinking about expanding the stub template into several variations. We could have a book stub, character stub, etc. That way the stub category could be collected into several types. And if none of the specialized stubs work you could just use the normal stub for a general purpose. What does everyone think? Jedi6 -(need help?) 23:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
The source of this page is SuperShadow, which is famous for releasing false informations. Joppyhoppy 11:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
I have added Versions and Related Books sections to that article. Versions lists the two original books, and the Related Books lists other books directly related to this book.
Each book information is listed in the following order: Author, Name, Year published, Isbn code, publisher, book type
Do you guys like this or should my changes be reverted? Also regarding the infobox, Which one of the original books specifications should go into the infobox? The first entry appears to be the pure original. The second books seems to be a reprint by another company.
Tutmosis
18:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
As you can see above, the template merged The Thrawn Trilogy and The Hand of Thrawn duology series of books together. It also lists books that are not even part of this 2 series such as the upcoming Allegiance (novel). Does anyone else think this template needs some clean up and structure? Tutmosis 01:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
In less than two months we managed to get over 50 participants. We are now the fourth biggest WikiProject in the Entertainment catergory. We are right after Doctor Who, Anime and manga, and Films. Go us!!! Jedi6 -(need help?) 00:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
SPPs are common in gaming articles (for example, "You can go to the top and defeat the boss there.") In reality, this should be changed to "one" or "the player" or "the character" or whatever. Here is a google search: [1] Deckiller 21:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Star wars game articles, such as Star Wars: Battlefront, have excess game information. Wikipedia is not a game guide; this information should be the subject of a transwiki. Deckiller 21:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
To make it easier to navigate, I'm thinking about using the todo's talk page like the Final Fantasy wikiproject: discussions on the todo list items (outside of some minor comments) will go there, and be archived upon completion. Deckiller 18:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)