![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I have been editing Russian aviation articles for a while now, doing bits and pieces before I delve in and do total re-writes in an attempt to bring these articles up to par - Aeroflot will be my first big one shortly. I was having a look at some of the Russian airport articles as part of getting info together for the re-writes, and I noticed that many of these articles are hopelessly out-of-date and are basically based upon information which US/NATO obtained/released when information did not flow freely. The same goes for the Russian aircraft articles, take a look at Tupolev Tu-95 for a perfect example, it is entirely written from a NATO perspective, with no information on where these aircraft are based, what squadrons, etc. Compare to the American equivalent, the B-52. Going thru tonnes of Russian articles, I was actually very surprised to find 3 articles that one would probably expect to be featured articles are not; those being Russia, Moscow and Russian language (yes the language article lost FA status 24 hours ago). I was also surprised to find that many articles I expected to exist do not; prime example being many of the Federal government ministries. Then there are other problems such as:
What I would suggest, rather what I am suggesting, is the following projects be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject_Russia and for it to be co-ordinated much like any other all-encompassing project. The projects I am suggest to be merged are:
Other projects which can be used as guides on how to structure the project would be:
Of course there needs to be concensus from all projects for a merge and structures be discussed, etc, but firstly, there needs to be discussion on the pros and cons of such an idea. I have posted this on the other project talk pages, and have asked that all discussion take place here so that we all projects can read off the same page. -- Russavia 16:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Привет!!! Выяснилось, что в добавок к общей путанице с АССР и современными республиками добавились ещё некотрые факты: некоторые из этих республик провозгласили себя как ССР на заре девянностых. См Aslan Dzharimov. Подобные факты всё-таки наводят меня на мысль, что про АССР Советского Союза и современные республики странцы надо создать отдельные. Вообще, я всё-таки за то, чтобы любая административная единица, особенно национальная, особенно с признаками госудраственности, имела бы собственную страницу, пусть пустую. Кстати, моджет я и невнимателен, но нету ли проекта типа Subdivisions of the Soviet Union? -- Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also: ә? Ә!) 20:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I have been editing Russian aviation articles for a while now, doing bits and pieces before I delve in and do total re-writes in an attempt to bring these articles up to par - Aeroflot will be my first big one shortly. I was having a look at some of the Russian airport articles as part of getting info together for the re-writes, and I noticed that many of these articles are hopelessly out-of-date and are basically based upon information which US/NATO obtained/released when information did not flow freely. The same goes for the Russian aircraft articles, take a look at Tupolev Tu-95 for a perfect example, it is entirely written from a NATO perspective, with no information on where these aircraft are based, what squadrons, etc. Compare to the American equivalent, the B-52. Going thru tonnes of Russian articles, I was actually very surprised to find 3 articles that one would probably expect to be featured articles are not; those being Russia, Moscow and Russian language (yes the language article lost FA status 24 hours ago). I was also surprised to find that many articles I expected to exist do not; prime example being many of the Federal government ministries. Then there are other problems such as:
What I would suggest, rather what I am suggesting, is the following projects be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject_Russia and for it to be co-ordinated much like any other all-encompassing project. The projects I am suggest to be merged are:
Other projects which can be used as guides on how to structure the project would be:
Of course there needs to be concensus from all projects for a merge and structures be discussed, etc, but firstly, there needs to be discussion on the pros and cons of such an idea. I have posted this on the other project talk pages, and have asked that all discussion take place here so that we all projects can read off the same page. -- Russavia 16:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Привет!!! Выяснилось, что в добавок к общей путанице с АССР и современными республиками добавились ещё некотрые факты: некоторые из этих республик провозгласили себя как ССР на заре девянностых. См Aslan Dzharimov. Подобные факты всё-таки наводят меня на мысль, что про АССР Советского Союза и современные республики странцы надо создать отдельные. Вообще, я всё-таки за то, чтобы любая административная единица, особенно национальная, особенно с признаками госудраственности, имела бы собственную страницу, пусть пустую. Кстати, моджет я и невнимателен, но нету ли проекта типа Subdivisions of the Soviet Union? -- Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also: ә? Ә!) 20:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)