| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Popular culture page. |
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
 |
 | Popular culture Unassessed ( inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
 | On 5 June 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture to Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular culture. The result of the discussion was moved. |
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Back in April, I proposed a few updates to improve the quality of the Daphne Guinness article here, and since the official Request Edits Queue seems to be stalled right now, I was wondering if an independent editor from here might be interested in reviewing my proposals. (I can’t implement them myself since I have a conflict of interest and am aware that would be a violation of Wikipedia policy.) Could someone in this WikiProject please take a look at these requests? Thanks for your time. YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr ( talk) 19:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Few months ago this project was tagged as inactive. I don't think this is correct (I still stop by here every now and often). Ping User:UnitedStatesian (re this, and this). I'd like to see Template:WikiProject Popular Culture reactivated and Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Popular_Culture_articles_by_quality_statistics undeleted (ping User:Liz). There are more deleted maintence categories at Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture/Assessment. Why delete such useful tools even if a project is semiactive or inactive? I was following a research link to https://wp1.openzim.org/#/project/Popular_Culture/articles?quality=FA-Class and due to the recent deletion, it's all dead. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Piotrus (and fyi, @
Liz): I would turn your question around and ask: what evidence is there that this project is active? Not a single talkpage item before this one has gotten a response. What article within scope of the project has recently been made a Good Article, or Featured Article, due to the efforts of this project? Is there any other way the project members are currently collaborating on this topic? One person, no matter how dedicated, does not a WikiProject make.
UnitedStatesian (
talk) 21:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @ UnitedStatesian Fair point, but inactivity is no justification for gutting useful infrastructure that wasn't hurting anyone and was useful to some folks (like me). I am less concerned with the status of this project than with the destruction of the assessment done by this project in the past. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
There's a discussion on Talk:Shipping (fandom) about whether (or not) to add a section about antis/anti-shippers to the article. Your input would be appreciated. Historyday01 ( talk) 17:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Rfc: Should the Eras Tour be mentioned in the lead of Sabrina Carpenter?
An RfC has been made here regarding whether Carpenter opening Taylor Swift's Eras Tour should be mentioned in the lead of Carpenter's biography article or not. You are invited to participate. ℛonherry ☘ 18:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Queen Mary 2
Queen Mary 2 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 ( talk) 17:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Cremastra ( talk) 19:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture → Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular culture – "Popular Culture" -> "Popular culture" to match the WikiProject naming convention used by the majority of multi-word WikiProjects (Military history, College football, Women's sport, etc.). ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf) 11:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think you messed this up, unless you really meant to propose that a project page be moved to a Talk page. That said, if/when this is refactored, I'd support "WikiProject Popular culture" with the lowercase c. DonIago ( talk) 14:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Popular culture page. |
|
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
|
|
| Popular culture Unassessed ( inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
| On 5 June 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture to Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular culture. The result of the discussion was moved. |
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Back in April, I proposed a few updates to improve the quality of the Daphne Guinness article here, and since the official Request Edits Queue seems to be stalled right now, I was wondering if an independent editor from here might be interested in reviewing my proposals. (I can’t implement them myself since I have a conflict of interest and am aware that would be a violation of Wikipedia policy.) Could someone in this WikiProject please take a look at these requests? Thanks for your time. YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr ( talk) 19:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Few months ago this project was tagged as inactive. I don't think this is correct (I still stop by here every now and often). Ping User:UnitedStatesian (re this, and this). I'd like to see Template:WikiProject Popular Culture reactivated and Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Popular_Culture_articles_by_quality_statistics undeleted (ping User:Liz). There are more deleted maintence categories at Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture/Assessment. Why delete such useful tools even if a project is semiactive or inactive? I was following a research link to https://wp1.openzim.org/#/project/Popular_Culture/articles?quality=FA-Class and due to the recent deletion, it's all dead. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Piotrus (and fyi, @
Liz): I would turn your question around and ask: what evidence is there that this project is active? Not a single talkpage item before this one has gotten a response. What article within scope of the project has recently been made a Good Article, or Featured Article, due to the efforts of this project? Is there any other way the project members are currently collaborating on this topic? One person, no matter how dedicated, does not a WikiProject make.
UnitedStatesian (
talk) 21:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @ UnitedStatesian Fair point, but inactivity is no justification for gutting useful infrastructure that wasn't hurting anyone and was useful to some folks (like me). I am less concerned with the status of this project than with the destruction of the assessment done by this project in the past. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
There's a discussion on Talk:Shipping (fandom) about whether (or not) to add a section about antis/anti-shippers to the article. Your input would be appreciated. Historyday01 ( talk) 17:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Rfc: Should the Eras Tour be mentioned in the lead of Sabrina Carpenter?
An RfC has been made here regarding whether Carpenter opening Taylor Swift's Eras Tour should be mentioned in the lead of Carpenter's biography article or not. You are invited to participate. ℛonherry ☘ 18:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Queen Mary 2
Queen Mary 2 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 ( talk) 17:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Cremastra ( talk) 19:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular Culture → Wikipedia:WikiProject Popular culture – "Popular Culture" -> "Popular culture" to match the WikiProject naming convention used by the majority of multi-word WikiProjects (Military history, College football, Women's sport, etc.). ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf) 11:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think you messed this up, unless you really meant to propose that a project page be moved to a Talk page. That said, if/when this is refactored, I'd support "WikiProject Popular culture" with the lowercase c. DonIago ( talk) 14:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)