![]() | Physics Project‑class | ||||||
|
You may want to consider the LEP experiments in the Particles and Symmetries section. Lots of results came out of the four LEP detectors, but arguably the most important was the Z lineshape measurement which can be used (among other things) to calculate the number of light neutrino species. In other words, the Standard Model contains three generations of progressively heavier quarks (up/down, charm/strange, and top/bottom) and leptons (electron, muon, and tau lepton, along with their respective nearly massless neutrinos). So how do we know there isn't a 4th generation, which we haven't seen because the quarks and charged lepton are just too heavy for us to create in the laboratory? The answer is: if you assume that the neutrinos are nearly massless (or at worst less than roughly 45 GeV), then the LEP measurement of the Z lineshape constrains the number of neutrinos to three (2.9840 +/- 0.0082), meaning that there is no 4th generation -- we have to stop at three.
The significance of this result isn't quite clear in the LEP article. In fact, I think the whole results section of that article is a bit weak.
Gdlong ( talk) 19:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Would Eratosthenes#Measurement_of_the_Earth be within scope? -- Pjacobi 18:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A fair few of experiments related to nobel prizes in Physics probably want to be included here, too. Mike Peel 07:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
BTW, we have no article parallel to de:Horror vacui. Our Horror vacui only covers the use of the term in visual arts.
Which one would count as the key experiment disproving horror vacui and establishing atmospheric pressure: Blaise Pascal's 1647 vide dans le vide ( de:Leere in der Leere) or Otto von Guericke's 1650 Magdeburg hemispheres?
Pjacobi 11:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
How about Gedankenexperiment ( thought experiments)? Would they come under this? Mike Peel 21:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems the first wave of adding articles to this list has subsided. The articles in this list now should be worked on, which in my view starts with making sure the names are chosen well. I think, the pattern of X-Y-Z experiment would be a good one, as long as there is no other, more generally known name for the exact experiment. Anybody have any input on this approach? Awolf002 00:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Physics Project‑class | ||||||
|
You may want to consider the LEP experiments in the Particles and Symmetries section. Lots of results came out of the four LEP detectors, but arguably the most important was the Z lineshape measurement which can be used (among other things) to calculate the number of light neutrino species. In other words, the Standard Model contains three generations of progressively heavier quarks (up/down, charm/strange, and top/bottom) and leptons (electron, muon, and tau lepton, along with their respective nearly massless neutrinos). So how do we know there isn't a 4th generation, which we haven't seen because the quarks and charged lepton are just too heavy for us to create in the laboratory? The answer is: if you assume that the neutrinos are nearly massless (or at worst less than roughly 45 GeV), then the LEP measurement of the Z lineshape constrains the number of neutrinos to three (2.9840 +/- 0.0082), meaning that there is no 4th generation -- we have to stop at three.
The significance of this result isn't quite clear in the LEP article. In fact, I think the whole results section of that article is a bit weak.
Gdlong ( talk) 19:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Would Eratosthenes#Measurement_of_the_Earth be within scope? -- Pjacobi 18:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A fair few of experiments related to nobel prizes in Physics probably want to be included here, too. Mike Peel 07:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
BTW, we have no article parallel to de:Horror vacui. Our Horror vacui only covers the use of the term in visual arts.
Which one would count as the key experiment disproving horror vacui and establishing atmospheric pressure: Blaise Pascal's 1647 vide dans le vide ( de:Leere in der Leere) or Otto von Guericke's 1650 Magdeburg hemispheres?
Pjacobi 11:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
How about Gedankenexperiment ( thought experiments)? Would they come under this? Mike Peel 21:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems the first wave of adding articles to this list has subsided. The articles in this list now should be worked on, which in my view starts with making sure the names are chosen well. I think, the pattern of X-Y-Z experiment would be a good one, as long as there is no other, more generally known name for the exact experiment. Anybody have any input on this approach? Awolf002 00:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)