WikiProject Physics Main / Talk |
Members |
Quality Control ( talk) |
Welcome |
Physics Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I've been working with relatively new editor @ Leptonsandquarks on the DUNE experiment article, and we have a question about its importance, currently assessed as Mid: does this subject qualify as High importance? Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 14:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Apologies if this is the wrong place to post. Quantum field theory was entirely rewritten in 2018 following the discovery of plagiarism. The quality has certainly improved, but the quality rating remains at C. What is the process to have its rating re-assessed? Yinweichen ( talk) 22:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I believe this has happened over the last few years and my understanding is that this was some sort of consensus decision, but can someone point me towards the page where this was decided or give me the rundown on why decay energies were removed from isotope pages?
For example, in Isotopes of uranium no decay energies are given in any of the tables. Some of the specific sections for certain isotopes contain this information, but being as part of paragraphs and not in a table, it's a pain to find. Isotopes of americium is slightly better as some of the specific isotope sections have tables with this info, but many are still missing.
The removal of this info makes very little sense to me. Kylesenior ( talk) 03:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I like the story as much as the next guy, but I have a hard time seeing how a cat rates as a mid-importance article. 138.234.75.76 ( talk) 17:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
An article with the above title has just gone live and is in need of assessment. Urayness ( talk) 15:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Physics Main / Talk |
Members |
Quality Control ( talk) |
Welcome |
Physics Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I've been working with relatively new editor @ Leptonsandquarks on the DUNE experiment article, and we have a question about its importance, currently assessed as Mid: does this subject qualify as High importance? Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 14:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Apologies if this is the wrong place to post. Quantum field theory was entirely rewritten in 2018 following the discovery of plagiarism. The quality has certainly improved, but the quality rating remains at C. What is the process to have its rating re-assessed? Yinweichen ( talk) 22:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I believe this has happened over the last few years and my understanding is that this was some sort of consensus decision, but can someone point me towards the page where this was decided or give me the rundown on why decay energies were removed from isotope pages?
For example, in Isotopes of uranium no decay energies are given in any of the tables. Some of the specific sections for certain isotopes contain this information, but being as part of paragraphs and not in a table, it's a pain to find. Isotopes of americium is slightly better as some of the specific isotope sections have tables with this info, but many are still missing.
The removal of this info makes very little sense to me. Kylesenior ( talk) 03:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I like the story as much as the next guy, but I have a hard time seeing how a cat rates as a mid-importance article. 138.234.75.76 ( talk) 17:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
An article with the above title has just gone live and is in need of assessment. Urayness ( talk) 15:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)