![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It seems technical editors are entirely on the outs and have been for some time on Wikipedia, so I assume this will not be seen by anyone.
Nonetheless. It seems that there should be a single high level article about the instrument, then technique articles.
Example:
Are there existing guidelines on this?
-- 2600:387:6:807:0:0:0:5D ( talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Representation theory of the Lorentz group is currently a good article nominee, nominated by YohanN7. I have started reviewing the article, but there is a fundamental disagreement here: the article is, in my opinion, much too long and covers topic in a level of detail that should better be deferred to related articles. YohanN7, of course, is of a different opinion, stated here.
Can someone please have a look and weigh in at the nomination talk page? Jakob.scholbach ( talk) 15:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Archive May 2017/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Physics.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Physics, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please check the above article, newly accepted by AFC, for any problems or issues. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 10:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
... at Relativity of simultaneity and Criticism of the theory of relativity. I have reverted enough now, and had reported at AIV for persistent addition of unsourced content. Now they have come with a silly source. This could need some eyes. - DVdm ( talk) 18:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Can someone help with the following GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC):
I have performed a bold revert of the article Spacetime and have entered in comments on the Talk page of this article: BOLD revert of Spacetime for discussion Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It seems technical editors are entirely on the outs and have been for some time on Wikipedia, so I assume this will not be seen by anyone.
Nonetheless. It seems that there should be a single high level article about the instrument, then technique articles.
Example:
Are there existing guidelines on this?
-- 2600:387:6:807:0:0:0:5D ( talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Representation theory of the Lorentz group is currently a good article nominee, nominated by YohanN7. I have started reviewing the article, but there is a fundamental disagreement here: the article is, in my opinion, much too long and covers topic in a level of detail that should better be deferred to related articles. YohanN7, of course, is of a different opinion, stated here.
Can someone please have a look and weigh in at the nomination talk page? Jakob.scholbach ( talk) 15:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Archive May 2017/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Physics.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Physics, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please check the above article, newly accepted by AFC, for any problems or issues. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 10:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
... at Relativity of simultaneity and Criticism of the theory of relativity. I have reverted enough now, and had reported at AIV for persistent addition of unsourced content. Now they have come with a silly source. This could need some eyes. - DVdm ( talk) 18:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Can someone help with the following GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC):
I have performed a bold revert of the article Spacetime and have entered in comments on the Talk page of this article: BOLD revert of Spacetime for discussion Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)