![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An IP has made a lot of physics-related proposals. Please comment. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
This is certainly... something. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I tagged the article Steady State theory for a potential move to "Steady State model" as it failed as an accepted theory. Your comments there are welcome. Cheers, -- Rowan Forest ( talk) 14:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
FYI, there's now an edit filter, Filter 680 that makes the SUN symbol illegal to use on Wikipedia. The Sun Symbol found at Solar mass in subscript form is currently disallowed when adding new text. So "☉" (U+2609) as in M☉ is impossible to type in articlespace, and a big red vandalism warning shows up instead of being saved.
As this is caused by rangeblocks of unicode characters, there may be some other physics and math symbols that are similarly deemed illegal. -- 65.94.42.168 ( talk) 10:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I just started Nanodumbbell and have no idea what I'm doing. Please visit the article and see if the "Effect of Surfactant on Growth of ZnO Nanodumbbells..." external link is the right thing. Are these things silica or zinc or what? Many thanks! :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
03:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)The articles Electric-field screening and Screening effect are very similar. I think the later is included in the former (see Thomas-Fermi section). Why should we keep Screening effect? MaoGo ( talk) 11:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
17:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet Xxanthippe ( talk) 06:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC).
BD2412 ( talk · contribs) has created Category:Eponymous scientific concepts and added many physics articles to the category. I see no value in having such a category and it seems particularly inappropriate when applied to Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism which is specifically not Newtonian. JRSpriggs ( talk) 06:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An IP has made a lot of physics-related proposals. Please comment. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
This is certainly... something. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I tagged the article Steady State theory for a potential move to "Steady State model" as it failed as an accepted theory. Your comments there are welcome. Cheers, -- Rowan Forest ( talk) 14:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
FYI, there's now an edit filter, Filter 680 that makes the SUN symbol illegal to use on Wikipedia. The Sun Symbol found at Solar mass in subscript form is currently disallowed when adding new text. So "☉" (U+2609) as in M☉ is impossible to type in articlespace, and a big red vandalism warning shows up instead of being saved.
As this is caused by rangeblocks of unicode characters, there may be some other physics and math symbols that are similarly deemed illegal. -- 65.94.42.168 ( talk) 10:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I just started Nanodumbbell and have no idea what I'm doing. Please visit the article and see if the "Effect of Surfactant on Growth of ZnO Nanodumbbells..." external link is the right thing. Are these things silica or zinc or what? Many thanks! :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
03:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)The articles Electric-field screening and Screening effect are very similar. I think the later is included in the former (see Thomas-Fermi section). Why should we keep Screening effect? MaoGo ( talk) 11:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
17:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet Xxanthippe ( talk) 06:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC).
BD2412 ( talk · contribs) has created Category:Eponymous scientific concepts and added many physics articles to the category. I see no value in having such a category and it seems particularly inappropriate when applied to Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism which is specifically not Newtonian. JRSpriggs ( talk) 06:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)