![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi I would like to request some help to make the Child sex tourism page NPOV, please check out the pages talk page, thank you. ( DrakeLuvenstein ( talk) 15:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC))
A Deletion Review has been opened on this deleted page. I'd like to point out that I am proposing merely to fill the empty space in the least controversial way possible. meco ( talk) -Undated
"A person under the age of consent (there is no shorter term)..." how about "PUTAC"? you could pronounce it "poo-tack". -- Atlantima ( talk) 17:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This project appears to be inactive and has been tagged as such. Talk page has been archived. A project subpage was deleted with only one comment from a project member.
It may be that this project is not needed at this time. It can be re-activated any time, if the need arises. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 02:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Consider activities resumed. Anti-pedophile activism, pedophile activism & pro-pedophile activism. These three have problems. There are clear biases in the opening statement of the latter, and which I noticed myself and other complaints confirming this. Similarly, the middle was just redirected to the latter when it was previously a disambig page. The latter two are being used interchangable, when clearly the constructions of the term indicate different things. Activism BY pedophiles and activism FOR pedophiles are clearly different ideas here. Anyone with a grasp of logic can understand that pedophiles can be active for things besides themself, and that people besides pedophiles can engage in activism for them. This applies to any group and any form of activism. I have posted notification to Wikipedia:Pedophile topic mentorship so we can work cooperatively with them to resolve this. I am hoping more experienced moderators will come through here. Tyciol ( talk) 03:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the overall perspective of this Wikiproject? I hope none of you are pedophiles, I know there are pedophiles here and there, but I would not like it if there was an approved pro-pedophile brigade on a Wiki-project. Apart from this, I would like it if you could track down which mainstream politicians (in Europe and America) are the most pro-pedophile. Also, I believe that there are links between Pedophiles, Abortionists and Secret societies; this is why the CIA and the Euro-Masons are alleged to be supporters of Pederasty. ADM ( talk) 19:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I think that there also needs to be discussion somewhere on the distinction that is sometimes made between Homosexual/Bisexual pedophiles and Heterosexual pedophiles. For instance, during the US pedophile priest crisis, it was discovered that the vast majority of pedophile priests were of the homosexual category, and that relatively few were not homosexual, since they typically went after boys. Therefore, the official reaction from the defense group Catholic League was to say that it was not so much a pedophile problem, but was instead a gay problem. I am not going to comment on this, but this seems to show the inherent tensions among the gay culture and the clerical culture on the problem of pederasty. ADM ( talk) 19:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
This project has no active members and is engaged in no ongoing improvement of any articles.
A review of the talk page shows that other than a few good-faith questions now and then, almost the entire content of the historical discussions consists of arguments with editors who have since been banned for disruption, or discussions about the disruption caused by those editors.
In the past, there may have been a use for this page, and there may have been some editors maintaining the project in a constructive way, but things have changed and the project is no longer being used in those ways.
Regarding the various information sections on the project page, they are not usable because they are not maintained. There is no active consensus regarding the terminology - all of that would need to be sourced on the individual topic pages anyway. The various links and resources are questionable and not up-to-date. They should be deleted unless they are maintained.
Also, now there is a formal administrative process page at Pedophilia Topic Mentorship, so discussions about disruptive editing concerns that may have been posted here in the past now have a better place to be posted. By maintaining this page in addition to that one, discussions are likely to be cross-posted, as happened recently, and that makes the discussions more difficult to focus.
The very few good-faith questions that are occasionally posted here can easily be handled on the talk pages of the relevant articles.
Unless some Wikipedians decide to get involved and build this project up into a constructive collegial project, it should be marked historical and comments regarding disruptive editing directed to WP:PedMen. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 02:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
An editor has brought up a concern that this image is illegal and should be deleted. Please come participate in the discussion. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? Talk to Nihonjoe 22:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I noticed this article was deleted, I asked about it and provided a reference which I think establishes notability. Reviewing this might make an interesting project. Tyciol ( talk) 03:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have information refuting or contrary to the quote at Talk:Pornography#Apparently awesome for Japanese a decade ago? I find it astonishing but the source seems solidly reliable. I don't need to tell people here about the differences between the content of Japanese porn in the late 1990s and elsewhere without such results but with sharp increases in kids' access to porn via the internet in the same era. Given the possible explanations centered around distraction of consumers who might otherwise be offenders and raised awareness of the subject of such depictions, I would really like to have wikiproject participants help out with a reality check, please. 208.54.5.61 ( talk) 03:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
There's a strange blog entry here that claims that the #2 at Wikimedia Foundation is an active supporter of pedophiles. This is a fairly serious accusation against the Foundation. Personally, I would like it if Wikipedia had less entries on weird subjects like child sex abuse. Because after a while, it almost feels like Wikipedia is turning into a pedophile encyclopedia, one that is free just for them so they can hang around here and brag about their abuse. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ADM ( talk) 04:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this project really needed? Isn't this topic covered pretty well by wp:SEX and wp:PORN? Please contact me on my talk page for a reply. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 14:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
The following comment was removed from the main page. It belongs on a talk page:
(My response is, this may have been my error, and if so, sorry, and anyone who wants to can restore the topic mentorship to its correct place. Herostratus ( talk) 04:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC))
Shouldn't something be written with regards to Wikipedia:Pedophilia? __ meco ( talk) 08:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article following its nomination for reassessment. You are being notified as your project banner is on the talk page. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Lolicon/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 03:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
We seem to have a problem with links to copyright violations in articles about the Catholic sex abuse scandal. If you work on these articles, please see Talk:Catholic sex abuse cases#Copyright_violations_by_other_websites for more information. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I added the project template to a talkpage of a recently dead person that seems to have admitted sexual assaults on young boys - Talk:Kit_Cunningham - is it within the scope of the template Talk:Kit_Cunningham - on the project page it seems to assert the project members set the scope? Off2riorob ( talk) 20:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books portraying sexual relations between minors and adults: another debate about the page. Delete or not? Negativecharge ( talk) 00:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
This article describes the controversy surrounding a scientific paper which appeared to legitimize or minimize the issue of child sexual abuse. That controversy has carried over to Wikipedia and the article has been a stomping ground for PPA's in the past. I'm not sure how active this project is, but I'd encourage anyone seeing this to watchlist the article and to review recent edits. (I find scientific studies tedious to decipher, so I'm not much help.) Will Beback talk 06:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering how active this project is and, presuming that more activity goes on than the "inactive" status implies, if there might be any way that I can help with reviewing and keeping up-to-date the articles under this project's scope. I'm only just now starting into editing on Wikipedia, and I understand that this is an especially difficult topic to achieve objectivity and accurate recording in, but I am willing to help in any way I can. Benjiboy5187 ( talk) 09:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Paedo Alert News and a couple of others by the same editor. Sources are off-line and hard for me to check for WP:N etc. Tijfo098 ( talk) 01:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Albert Fish, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 02:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The article about Nefarious: Merchant of Souls, a film that deals with child prostitution, has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix ( talk) 15:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
In case anybody with experience is actually checking this talk-page periodically -- I wanted to suggest that if appropriate, the article pederasty be added to the watch. It references boys as young as 11 years old, and most of the article is overly positive, complete with (at one point) the pedo red flag claim that society's condemnation of pederastic sodomy was the only cause of harm. — xyzzymage 11:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
The article about the documentary film Not My Life, which deals with child sex tourism, has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix ( talk) 03:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej ( talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej ( talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Oxford sex gang to be moved to Oxford child sex abuse case (2013). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 13:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Catholic Church sexual abuse cases to be moved to Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 10:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Catholic Church sexual abuse cases to be moved to Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 04:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legality of drawn pornography depicting minors. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Australia to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Australia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the United States to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Japan to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Japan. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography in the Philippines to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the Philippines. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Canada to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Canada. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the United Kingdom to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the United Kingdom. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the Netherlands to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the Netherlands. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Portugal to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Portugal. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#What_is_Texas.27s_age_of_consent.3F WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
See Talk:Age_of_consent#Defining_what_.22age_of_consent.22_means.3F WhisperToMe ( talk) 22:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for USA Gymnastics sex abuse scandal to be moved to Larry Nassar sex abuse scandal. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 07:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Family International to be moved to The Family International. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 17:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders to be moved to Abuse by members of Catholic orders. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 11:47, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please have your say at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Francis Reuel Tolkien Rathfelder ( talk) 11:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders to be moved to Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders and societies. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 15:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Simulated child pornography in the United States to be moved to Simulated and drawn child pornography in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 00:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations to be moved to Pedophile advocacy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 19:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations to be moved to List of pedophile advocacy organizations. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 03:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legal status of virtual child pornography. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 23:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Health and appearance of Michael Jackson has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. I also mentioned the child abuse allegations against Jackson so I thought you might be interested. Quaffel ( talk) 06:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Nefarious: Merchant of Souls for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 20:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Suicide of Louis Conradt to be moved to suicide of Bill Conradt. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 19:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Age disparity in sexual relationships to be moved to Age disparity in heterosexual relationships. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 13:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legal status of fictional child pornography. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky ( talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for ECPAT International to be moved to ECPAT. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 14:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi I would like to request some help to make the Child sex tourism page NPOV, please check out the pages talk page, thank you. ( DrakeLuvenstein ( talk) 15:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC))
A Deletion Review has been opened on this deleted page. I'd like to point out that I am proposing merely to fill the empty space in the least controversial way possible. meco ( talk) -Undated
"A person under the age of consent (there is no shorter term)..." how about "PUTAC"? you could pronounce it "poo-tack". -- Atlantima ( talk) 17:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This project appears to be inactive and has been tagged as such. Talk page has been archived. A project subpage was deleted with only one comment from a project member.
It may be that this project is not needed at this time. It can be re-activated any time, if the need arises. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 02:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Consider activities resumed. Anti-pedophile activism, pedophile activism & pro-pedophile activism. These three have problems. There are clear biases in the opening statement of the latter, and which I noticed myself and other complaints confirming this. Similarly, the middle was just redirected to the latter when it was previously a disambig page. The latter two are being used interchangable, when clearly the constructions of the term indicate different things. Activism BY pedophiles and activism FOR pedophiles are clearly different ideas here. Anyone with a grasp of logic can understand that pedophiles can be active for things besides themself, and that people besides pedophiles can engage in activism for them. This applies to any group and any form of activism. I have posted notification to Wikipedia:Pedophile topic mentorship so we can work cooperatively with them to resolve this. I am hoping more experienced moderators will come through here. Tyciol ( talk) 03:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the overall perspective of this Wikiproject? I hope none of you are pedophiles, I know there are pedophiles here and there, but I would not like it if there was an approved pro-pedophile brigade on a Wiki-project. Apart from this, I would like it if you could track down which mainstream politicians (in Europe and America) are the most pro-pedophile. Also, I believe that there are links between Pedophiles, Abortionists and Secret societies; this is why the CIA and the Euro-Masons are alleged to be supporters of Pederasty. ADM ( talk) 19:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I think that there also needs to be discussion somewhere on the distinction that is sometimes made between Homosexual/Bisexual pedophiles and Heterosexual pedophiles. For instance, during the US pedophile priest crisis, it was discovered that the vast majority of pedophile priests were of the homosexual category, and that relatively few were not homosexual, since they typically went after boys. Therefore, the official reaction from the defense group Catholic League was to say that it was not so much a pedophile problem, but was instead a gay problem. I am not going to comment on this, but this seems to show the inherent tensions among the gay culture and the clerical culture on the problem of pederasty. ADM ( talk) 19:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
This project has no active members and is engaged in no ongoing improvement of any articles.
A review of the talk page shows that other than a few good-faith questions now and then, almost the entire content of the historical discussions consists of arguments with editors who have since been banned for disruption, or discussions about the disruption caused by those editors.
In the past, there may have been a use for this page, and there may have been some editors maintaining the project in a constructive way, but things have changed and the project is no longer being used in those ways.
Regarding the various information sections on the project page, they are not usable because they are not maintained. There is no active consensus regarding the terminology - all of that would need to be sourced on the individual topic pages anyway. The various links and resources are questionable and not up-to-date. They should be deleted unless they are maintained.
Also, now there is a formal administrative process page at Pedophilia Topic Mentorship, so discussions about disruptive editing concerns that may have been posted here in the past now have a better place to be posted. By maintaining this page in addition to that one, discussions are likely to be cross-posted, as happened recently, and that makes the discussions more difficult to focus.
The very few good-faith questions that are occasionally posted here can easily be handled on the talk pages of the relevant articles.
Unless some Wikipedians decide to get involved and build this project up into a constructive collegial project, it should be marked historical and comments regarding disruptive editing directed to WP:PedMen. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 02:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
An editor has brought up a concern that this image is illegal and should be deleted. Please come participate in the discussion. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? Talk to Nihonjoe 22:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I noticed this article was deleted, I asked about it and provided a reference which I think establishes notability. Reviewing this might make an interesting project. Tyciol ( talk) 03:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have information refuting or contrary to the quote at Talk:Pornography#Apparently awesome for Japanese a decade ago? I find it astonishing but the source seems solidly reliable. I don't need to tell people here about the differences between the content of Japanese porn in the late 1990s and elsewhere without such results but with sharp increases in kids' access to porn via the internet in the same era. Given the possible explanations centered around distraction of consumers who might otherwise be offenders and raised awareness of the subject of such depictions, I would really like to have wikiproject participants help out with a reality check, please. 208.54.5.61 ( talk) 03:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
There's a strange blog entry here that claims that the #2 at Wikimedia Foundation is an active supporter of pedophiles. This is a fairly serious accusation against the Foundation. Personally, I would like it if Wikipedia had less entries on weird subjects like child sex abuse. Because after a while, it almost feels like Wikipedia is turning into a pedophile encyclopedia, one that is free just for them so they can hang around here and brag about their abuse. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ADM ( talk) 04:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this project really needed? Isn't this topic covered pretty well by wp:SEX and wp:PORN? Please contact me on my talk page for a reply. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 14:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
The following comment was removed from the main page. It belongs on a talk page:
(My response is, this may have been my error, and if so, sorry, and anyone who wants to can restore the topic mentorship to its correct place. Herostratus ( talk) 04:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC))
Shouldn't something be written with regards to Wikipedia:Pedophilia? __ meco ( talk) 08:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article following its nomination for reassessment. You are being notified as your project banner is on the talk page. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Lolicon/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 03:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
We seem to have a problem with links to copyright violations in articles about the Catholic sex abuse scandal. If you work on these articles, please see Talk:Catholic sex abuse cases#Copyright_violations_by_other_websites for more information. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I added the project template to a talkpage of a recently dead person that seems to have admitted sexual assaults on young boys - Talk:Kit_Cunningham - is it within the scope of the template Talk:Kit_Cunningham - on the project page it seems to assert the project members set the scope? Off2riorob ( talk) 20:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books portraying sexual relations between minors and adults: another debate about the page. Delete or not? Negativecharge ( talk) 00:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
This article describes the controversy surrounding a scientific paper which appeared to legitimize or minimize the issue of child sexual abuse. That controversy has carried over to Wikipedia and the article has been a stomping ground for PPA's in the past. I'm not sure how active this project is, but I'd encourage anyone seeing this to watchlist the article and to review recent edits. (I find scientific studies tedious to decipher, so I'm not much help.) Will Beback talk 06:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering how active this project is and, presuming that more activity goes on than the "inactive" status implies, if there might be any way that I can help with reviewing and keeping up-to-date the articles under this project's scope. I'm only just now starting into editing on Wikipedia, and I understand that this is an especially difficult topic to achieve objectivity and accurate recording in, but I am willing to help in any way I can. Benjiboy5187 ( talk) 09:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Paedo Alert News and a couple of others by the same editor. Sources are off-line and hard for me to check for WP:N etc. Tijfo098 ( talk) 01:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Albert Fish, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 02:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The article about Nefarious: Merchant of Souls, a film that deals with child prostitution, has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix ( talk) 15:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
In case anybody with experience is actually checking this talk-page periodically -- I wanted to suggest that if appropriate, the article pederasty be added to the watch. It references boys as young as 11 years old, and most of the article is overly positive, complete with (at one point) the pedo red flag claim that society's condemnation of pederastic sodomy was the only cause of harm. — xyzzymage 11:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
The article about the documentary film Not My Life, which deals with child sex tourism, has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix ( talk) 03:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej ( talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej ( talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Oxford sex gang to be moved to Oxford child sex abuse case (2013). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 13:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Catholic Church sexual abuse cases to be moved to Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 10:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Catholic Church sexual abuse cases to be moved to Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 04:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legality of drawn pornography depicting minors. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Australia to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Australia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the United States to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Japan to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Japan. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography in the Philippines to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the Philippines. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Canada to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Canada. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the United Kingdom to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the United Kingdom. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in the Netherlands to be moved to Legality of child pornography in the Netherlands. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Child pornography laws in Portugal to be moved to Legality of child pornography in Portugal. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#What_is_Texas.27s_age_of_consent.3F WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
See Talk:Age_of_consent#Defining_what_.22age_of_consent.22_means.3F WhisperToMe ( talk) 22:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for USA Gymnastics sex abuse scandal to be moved to Larry Nassar sex abuse scandal. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 07:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Family International to be moved to The Family International. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 17:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders to be moved to Abuse by members of Catholic orders. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 11:47, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please have your say at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Francis Reuel Tolkien Rathfelder ( talk) 11:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders to be moved to Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders and societies. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 15:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Simulated child pornography in the United States to be moved to Simulated and drawn child pornography in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 00:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations to be moved to Pedophile advocacy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 19:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations to be moved to List of pedophile advocacy organizations. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 03:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legal status of virtual child pornography. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 23:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Health and appearance of Michael Jackson has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. I also mentioned the child abuse allegations against Jackson so I thought you might be interested. Quaffel ( talk) 06:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Nefarious: Merchant of Souls for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 20:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Suicide of Louis Conradt to be moved to suicide of Bill Conradt. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 19:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Age disparity in sexual relationships to be moved to Age disparity in heterosexual relationships. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 13:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors to be moved to Legal status of fictional child pornography. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 02:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky ( talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
A requested move discussion has been initiated for ECPAT International to be moved to ECPAT. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. — RMCD bot 14:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)