For simplicities sake I have renamed the Infoboxes:
Syntax:
{{MelbSuburbBox1 | LGA=[[City of Kingston]] | Northwest=Chelsea | North=Chelsea Heights | Northeast=Bangholme | West=Bonbeach | Here=Patterson Lakes | East=Bangholme | Southwest=Carrum | South=Seaford | Southeast=Carrum Downs }}
Syntax:
{{MelbSuburbBox2 | LGA=[[City of Kingston]] | Northwest=[[Chelsea, Victoria|Chelsea]] | North=[[Chelsea Heights, Victoria|Chelsea Heights]] | Northeast=[[Bangholme, Victoria|Bangholme]] | West=[[Bonbeach, Victoria|Bonbeach]] | Here=[[Patterson Lakes, Victoria|Patterson Lakes]] | East=[[Bangholme, Victoria|Bangholme]] | Southwest=[[Carrum, Victoria|Carrum]] | South=[[Seaford, Victoria|Seaford]] | Southeast=[[Carrum Downs, Victoria|Carrum Downs]] }}
-- Chuq 01:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Many people seem to have raised the issue of highlighting bodies of water conveniently and clearly in the current box format, so I've come up with this: Link
Template (temporary location): User:Evan C/Sandbox
It works, and isn't hard to do. It's not a perfectly "clean" solution, but we're not going to get one with the current templating system. I haven't put it into the real template yet in case there are issues with it that I'm not seeing.
Cheers -- Evan C ( Talk) 02:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
I know there is a wikipedia place to report things like this, but I thought we could get it cleaned up ourselves quicker, so reporting it here. Duplication of Brunswick, Victoria and Brunswick, Melbourne. I don't have time right now, but perhaps someone could make sure the Victoria one has all the info of the Melbourne one, and delete if it does? -- Generica 05:13, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
Hope you all don't mind, but I'm going to "steal" a lot of your concepts! - Ta bu shi da yu 04:32, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Now, don't get me wrong, I think there is some use in geographically linking the suburbs with these tables, but recently a sum total of two people have spoken out against them! Anyway, that leads to a valid point - we may consider them useful, but that is our naturally biased opinion, havig spent so much energy on the whole thing. Wikipians at large may not agree. I don't know, so I suggest we open this up on the Village Pump and ask for some general opinions on whether or not people would find these tables useful. If the vast majority think not, it may need rethinking, but there's only one way to find out...
Also, if we are going to work with the WPS folks on a shared format for suburb articles, we ought to have just the one discussion spot, not two. I would naturally suggest here ( :P ), but whatever works is fine with me.
T. P.K. 06:21, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Reply at Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board/WikiProjects -- Chuq 12:44, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The current format of the suburb adjacency tables has two flaws:
1. Bodies of water such as Port Phillip should be rendered in a different background colour to make it clearer to the casual browser that it is a body of water and not a suburb.
2. Where a suburb would fill more than one adjacency cell in the table, there is no way to implement rowspan and colspan attributes in the table tags. To see how adjacency cells can span more than one cell, see the entry for Springvale South where the adjacent suburbs of Keysborough and Dingley Village both span two cells.
Can the wiki be altered to include these attributes if they are not already present? -- B.d.mills 01:53, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Just looking at them for the first time, the tables seem to work well, apart from the fact that there are some incosistencies in certain suburbs (like Hawthorn East). Tim 02:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I have looked at all articles in the List of Melbourne suburbs and made a guesstimate of percentage complete for each one. I have rated each article between 0.10 for a basic stub to 1.00 for a virtually complete article. Examples of complete articles would include Brunswick, Frankston, Belgrave, Doncaster East, Somers and North Melbourne.
I am unsure as to which of the outer suburbs are included within the boundary of Greater Melbourne. Does anyone know if there is a definitive list?
On the assumption that all suburbs in the list require articles, then the overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 31 January, 2006, is 24%.
Based on the above numbers a league table of Melbourne Cities and Shires looks like this:
Note: Some suburbs are shared between cities, hence numbers such as 8.50 suburbs.
If you live in an area down at the bottom of the table perhaps you might consider adopting one or two of your local suburbs for future articles. Eric. Cuddy Wifter 04:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm from Adelaide and I have come and created council templates along the lines of those in Adelaide. Likewise templates have been created for all the councils in Melbourne, which can be added appropriately by {{City of ..... suburbs}}. The list of subrubs was based on the corresponding article for the council. I have been adding these things at the bottom of the relevant suburb. Blnguyen 04:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Just to notify anyone interested, I've just spent the last 5 hours or so (hey - I lost track of time :P) filling in the table of every suburb that had the MelbSuburbBoxIncomplete template. They're mostly 3x3s, for now anyway. However I couldn't locate Clayton North on Street-Directory.com.au or in my hardcopy Melway, so I couldn't do that.
Must sleep now. Cheers -- Evan C 16:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Why exactly is the naming convention for the article title "Suburb, Victoria"? Shouldn't it just be "Suburb" when there is no ambiguity with any other town? I agree that there should always be a redirect for the "Suburb, Victoria" form, for uniformity, but the ", Victoria" bit really seems unnecessary. Not only that, it doesn't reflect any real world convention...I've never heard of "Hawthorn East, Victoria" for example. I don't see many non-wikipedia non-address appearances on Google either. Stevage 13:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I have recalculated my guesstimate of percentage complete for Melbourne Suburbs articles. Here is the updated "league table" of Melbourne Cities and Shires.
Pos'n | Name of City/Shire | No. of Suburbs |
%Complete Jan. 31 '06 |
%Complete April 19 '06 |
1 | City of Melbourne | 12.5 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
2 | City of Moreland | 12.5 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
3 | City of Yarra | 9.5 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
4 | City of Knox | 10.0 | 0.50 | 0.54 |
5 | City of Darebin | 7.5 | 0.53 | 0.46 |
6 | City of Frankston | 6.0 | 0.37 | 0.44 |
7 | City of Manningham | 10.0 | 0.38 | 0.44 |
8 | City of Whitehorse | 15.0 | 0.28 | 0.43 |
9 | City of Boroondara | 11.5 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
10 | City of Wyndham | 9.0 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
11 | City of Moonee Valley | 13.5 | 0.34 | 0.39 |
12 | City of Monash | 13.0 | 0.24 | 0.34 |
13 | City of Stonnington | 8.5 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
14 | City of Bayside | 8.5 | 0.18 | 0.34 |
15 | City of Port Phillip | 10.0 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
16 | City of Hume | 23.0 | 0.20 | 0.28 |
17 | City of Maribyrnong | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.27 |
18 | Shire of Nillumbik | 19.5 | 0.19 | 0.27 |
19 | City of Whittlesea | 11.5 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
20 | Shire of Yarra Ranges | 49.0 | 0.20 | 0.25 |
21 | City of Banyule | 18.0 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
22 | City of Kingston | 20.0 | 0.20 | 0.24 |
23 | Shire of Mornington Peninsula | 35.0 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
24 | City of Hobsons Bay | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
25 | City of Greater Dandenong | 10.0 | 0.19 | 0.22 |
26 | City of Maroondah | 11.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
27 | City of Casey | 23.0 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
28 | City of Glen Eira | 12.0 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
29 | Shire of Melton | 10.0 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
30 | City of Brimbank | 17.5 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
31 | Shire of Cardinia | 43.0 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 19 April, 2006, is 29%. My estimate is that 18 articles are complete, 62 are more than 50% complete, 161 are between 20 and 50% complete, 183 are stubs and 55 have not been started.
The following suburbs are estimated at over 70% complete. May I suggest that all participants in the Melbourne Project consider this list and adopt one or two of these articles which, with a little effort, can boost the completed list. If you wish to look at examples of completed articles check these :
Brunswick,
Frankston,
Belgrave,
Doncaster East,
Somers and
North Melbourne.
City of Melbourne
City of Port Phillip
City of Yarra
City of Hume
City of Moonee Valley
City of Moreland
Shire of Nillumbik
City of Whittlesea
City of Boroondara
City of Knox
City of Whitehorse
Shire of Yarra Ranges
City of Bayside
City of Kingston
City of Maribyrnong
City of Wyndham
Cuddy Wifter
06:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Update of Melbourne Suburbs articles. Here is the updated "league table" of Melbourne Cities and Shires.
Pos'n | Name of City/Shire | No. of Suburbs |
%Complete Jan. 31 '06 |
%Complete April 19 '06 |
%Complete Aug 2 '06 |
1 | City of Melbourne | 13.5 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
2 | City of Moreland | 12.5 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
3 | City of Yarra | 9.5 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
4 | City of Knox | 10.0 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.57 |
5 | City of Darebin | 7.5 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.57 |
6 | City of Manningham | 10.0 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.49 |
7 | City of Whitehorse | 16.0 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.48 |
8 | City of Wyndham | 9.0 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
9 | City of Stonnington | 8.5 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
10 | City of Boroondara | 11.5 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.41 |
11 | City of Moonee Valley | 13.5 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.41 |
12 | City of Port Phillip | 10.0 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.41 |
13 | City of Frankston | 7.0 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.39 |
14 | City of Bayside | 8.5 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.37 |
15 | City of Maribyrnong | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.34 |
16 | City of Monash | 14.0 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.33 |
17 | City of Hume | 23.0 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
18 | City of Banyule | 18.0 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.29 |
19 | City of Hobsons Bay | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.29 |
20 | City of Whittlesea | 11.5 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
21 | Shire of Nillumbik | 19.5 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
22 | Shire of Yarra Ranges | 49.0 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
23 | City of Glen Eira | 12.0 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
24 | Shire of Mornington Peninsula | 35.0 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.26 |
25 | City of Kingston | 20.0 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
26 | City of Greater Dandenong | 10.0 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
27 | City of Maroondah | 11.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
28 | City of Casey | 24.0 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
29 | Shire of Melton | 10.0 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
30 | City of Brimbank | 17.5 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
31 | Shire of Cardinia | 43.0 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 2 Augustl, 2006, is 32%. My estimate is that 22 articles are complete, 75 are more than 50% complete, 176 are between 20 and 50% complete, 163 are stubs and 48 have not been started. -
Cuddy Wifter
04:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Since the last time I did a progress update on Melbourne Suburbs articles the WikiProject Australia/Assessment project has appeared on the scene. While doing this update I have also assessed all suburb articles for quality and importance in accordance with these Assessment standards. My previous scale of assessment of articles has been mainly based on the percentage content of articles, with the assumption of a complete article being somewhere between class GA and B on the Quality scale in the Assessment project.
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 12 April, 2007, is now estimated at 39%. My guesstimate is that 24 articles are virtually complete, 115 are over 50% complete, 209 are between 20 and 50% complete, 116 are stubs and 19 have not been started. - Cuddy Wifter 01:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cuddy Wifter 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I have taken a look at progress for Melbourne suburbs articles which, as at January 17, 2008, I estimate at 44% complete. My guesstimate is that 26 articles are virtually complete, 143 are over 50% complete, 190 are between 45 and 25% complete, 107 are basic stubs and 17 have not been started. Anyone looking to "adopt" a Melbourne related article should check out any of the above list of suburbs which are mostly still stubs. Cuddy Wifter ( talk) 20:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
For simplicities sake I have renamed the Infoboxes:
Syntax:
{{MelbSuburbBox1 | LGA=[[City of Kingston]] | Northwest=Chelsea | North=Chelsea Heights | Northeast=Bangholme | West=Bonbeach | Here=Patterson Lakes | East=Bangholme | Southwest=Carrum | South=Seaford | Southeast=Carrum Downs }}
Syntax:
{{MelbSuburbBox2 | LGA=[[City of Kingston]] | Northwest=[[Chelsea, Victoria|Chelsea]] | North=[[Chelsea Heights, Victoria|Chelsea Heights]] | Northeast=[[Bangholme, Victoria|Bangholme]] | West=[[Bonbeach, Victoria|Bonbeach]] | Here=[[Patterson Lakes, Victoria|Patterson Lakes]] | East=[[Bangholme, Victoria|Bangholme]] | Southwest=[[Carrum, Victoria|Carrum]] | South=[[Seaford, Victoria|Seaford]] | Southeast=[[Carrum Downs, Victoria|Carrum Downs]] }}
-- Chuq 01:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Many people seem to have raised the issue of highlighting bodies of water conveniently and clearly in the current box format, so I've come up with this: Link
Template (temporary location): User:Evan C/Sandbox
It works, and isn't hard to do. It's not a perfectly "clean" solution, but we're not going to get one with the current templating system. I haven't put it into the real template yet in case there are issues with it that I'm not seeing.
Cheers -- Evan C ( Talk) 02:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
I know there is a wikipedia place to report things like this, but I thought we could get it cleaned up ourselves quicker, so reporting it here. Duplication of Brunswick, Victoria and Brunswick, Melbourne. I don't have time right now, but perhaps someone could make sure the Victoria one has all the info of the Melbourne one, and delete if it does? -- Generica 05:13, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
Hope you all don't mind, but I'm going to "steal" a lot of your concepts! - Ta bu shi da yu 04:32, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Now, don't get me wrong, I think there is some use in geographically linking the suburbs with these tables, but recently a sum total of two people have spoken out against them! Anyway, that leads to a valid point - we may consider them useful, but that is our naturally biased opinion, havig spent so much energy on the whole thing. Wikipians at large may not agree. I don't know, so I suggest we open this up on the Village Pump and ask for some general opinions on whether or not people would find these tables useful. If the vast majority think not, it may need rethinking, but there's only one way to find out...
Also, if we are going to work with the WPS folks on a shared format for suburb articles, we ought to have just the one discussion spot, not two. I would naturally suggest here ( :P ), but whatever works is fine with me.
T. P.K. 06:21, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Reply at Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board/WikiProjects -- Chuq 12:44, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The current format of the suburb adjacency tables has two flaws:
1. Bodies of water such as Port Phillip should be rendered in a different background colour to make it clearer to the casual browser that it is a body of water and not a suburb.
2. Where a suburb would fill more than one adjacency cell in the table, there is no way to implement rowspan and colspan attributes in the table tags. To see how adjacency cells can span more than one cell, see the entry for Springvale South where the adjacent suburbs of Keysborough and Dingley Village both span two cells.
Can the wiki be altered to include these attributes if they are not already present? -- B.d.mills 01:53, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Just looking at them for the first time, the tables seem to work well, apart from the fact that there are some incosistencies in certain suburbs (like Hawthorn East). Tim 02:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I have looked at all articles in the List of Melbourne suburbs and made a guesstimate of percentage complete for each one. I have rated each article between 0.10 for a basic stub to 1.00 for a virtually complete article. Examples of complete articles would include Brunswick, Frankston, Belgrave, Doncaster East, Somers and North Melbourne.
I am unsure as to which of the outer suburbs are included within the boundary of Greater Melbourne. Does anyone know if there is a definitive list?
On the assumption that all suburbs in the list require articles, then the overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 31 January, 2006, is 24%.
Based on the above numbers a league table of Melbourne Cities and Shires looks like this:
Note: Some suburbs are shared between cities, hence numbers such as 8.50 suburbs.
If you live in an area down at the bottom of the table perhaps you might consider adopting one or two of your local suburbs for future articles. Eric. Cuddy Wifter 04:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm from Adelaide and I have come and created council templates along the lines of those in Adelaide. Likewise templates have been created for all the councils in Melbourne, which can be added appropriately by {{City of ..... suburbs}}. The list of subrubs was based on the corresponding article for the council. I have been adding these things at the bottom of the relevant suburb. Blnguyen 04:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Just to notify anyone interested, I've just spent the last 5 hours or so (hey - I lost track of time :P) filling in the table of every suburb that had the MelbSuburbBoxIncomplete template. They're mostly 3x3s, for now anyway. However I couldn't locate Clayton North on Street-Directory.com.au or in my hardcopy Melway, so I couldn't do that.
Must sleep now. Cheers -- Evan C 16:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Why exactly is the naming convention for the article title "Suburb, Victoria"? Shouldn't it just be "Suburb" when there is no ambiguity with any other town? I agree that there should always be a redirect for the "Suburb, Victoria" form, for uniformity, but the ", Victoria" bit really seems unnecessary. Not only that, it doesn't reflect any real world convention...I've never heard of "Hawthorn East, Victoria" for example. I don't see many non-wikipedia non-address appearances on Google either. Stevage 13:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I have recalculated my guesstimate of percentage complete for Melbourne Suburbs articles. Here is the updated "league table" of Melbourne Cities and Shires.
Pos'n | Name of City/Shire | No. of Suburbs |
%Complete Jan. 31 '06 |
%Complete April 19 '06 |
1 | City of Melbourne | 12.5 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
2 | City of Moreland | 12.5 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
3 | City of Yarra | 9.5 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
4 | City of Knox | 10.0 | 0.50 | 0.54 |
5 | City of Darebin | 7.5 | 0.53 | 0.46 |
6 | City of Frankston | 6.0 | 0.37 | 0.44 |
7 | City of Manningham | 10.0 | 0.38 | 0.44 |
8 | City of Whitehorse | 15.0 | 0.28 | 0.43 |
9 | City of Boroondara | 11.5 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
10 | City of Wyndham | 9.0 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
11 | City of Moonee Valley | 13.5 | 0.34 | 0.39 |
12 | City of Monash | 13.0 | 0.24 | 0.34 |
13 | City of Stonnington | 8.5 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
14 | City of Bayside | 8.5 | 0.18 | 0.34 |
15 | City of Port Phillip | 10.0 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
16 | City of Hume | 23.0 | 0.20 | 0.28 |
17 | City of Maribyrnong | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.27 |
18 | Shire of Nillumbik | 19.5 | 0.19 | 0.27 |
19 | City of Whittlesea | 11.5 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
20 | Shire of Yarra Ranges | 49.0 | 0.20 | 0.25 |
21 | City of Banyule | 18.0 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
22 | City of Kingston | 20.0 | 0.20 | 0.24 |
23 | Shire of Mornington Peninsula | 35.0 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
24 | City of Hobsons Bay | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
25 | City of Greater Dandenong | 10.0 | 0.19 | 0.22 |
26 | City of Maroondah | 11.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
27 | City of Casey | 23.0 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
28 | City of Glen Eira | 12.0 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
29 | Shire of Melton | 10.0 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
30 | City of Brimbank | 17.5 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
31 | Shire of Cardinia | 43.0 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 19 April, 2006, is 29%. My estimate is that 18 articles are complete, 62 are more than 50% complete, 161 are between 20 and 50% complete, 183 are stubs and 55 have not been started.
The following suburbs are estimated at over 70% complete. May I suggest that all participants in the Melbourne Project consider this list and adopt one or two of these articles which, with a little effort, can boost the completed list. If you wish to look at examples of completed articles check these :
Brunswick,
Frankston,
Belgrave,
Doncaster East,
Somers and
North Melbourne.
City of Melbourne
City of Port Phillip
City of Yarra
City of Hume
City of Moonee Valley
City of Moreland
Shire of Nillumbik
City of Whittlesea
City of Boroondara
City of Knox
City of Whitehorse
Shire of Yarra Ranges
City of Bayside
City of Kingston
City of Maribyrnong
City of Wyndham
Cuddy Wifter
06:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Update of Melbourne Suburbs articles. Here is the updated "league table" of Melbourne Cities and Shires.
Pos'n | Name of City/Shire | No. of Suburbs |
%Complete Jan. 31 '06 |
%Complete April 19 '06 |
%Complete Aug 2 '06 |
1 | City of Melbourne | 13.5 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
2 | City of Moreland | 12.5 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
3 | City of Yarra | 9.5 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
4 | City of Knox | 10.0 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.57 |
5 | City of Darebin | 7.5 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.57 |
6 | City of Manningham | 10.0 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.49 |
7 | City of Whitehorse | 16.0 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.48 |
8 | City of Wyndham | 9.0 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
9 | City of Stonnington | 8.5 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
10 | City of Boroondara | 11.5 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.41 |
11 | City of Moonee Valley | 13.5 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.41 |
12 | City of Port Phillip | 10.0 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.41 |
13 | City of Frankston | 7.0 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.39 |
14 | City of Bayside | 8.5 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.37 |
15 | City of Maribyrnong | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.34 |
16 | City of Monash | 14.0 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.33 |
17 | City of Hume | 23.0 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
18 | City of Banyule | 18.0 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.29 |
19 | City of Hobsons Bay | 9.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.29 |
20 | City of Whittlesea | 11.5 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
21 | Shire of Nillumbik | 19.5 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
22 | Shire of Yarra Ranges | 49.0 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
23 | City of Glen Eira | 12.0 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
24 | Shire of Mornington Peninsula | 35.0 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.26 |
25 | City of Kingston | 20.0 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
26 | City of Greater Dandenong | 10.0 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
27 | City of Maroondah | 11.0 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
28 | City of Casey | 24.0 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
29 | Shire of Melton | 10.0 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
30 | City of Brimbank | 17.5 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
31 | Shire of Cardinia | 43.0 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 2 Augustl, 2006, is 32%. My estimate is that 22 articles are complete, 75 are more than 50% complete, 176 are between 20 and 50% complete, 163 are stubs and 48 have not been started. -
Cuddy Wifter
04:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Since the last time I did a progress update on Melbourne Suburbs articles the WikiProject Australia/Assessment project has appeared on the scene. While doing this update I have also assessed all suburb articles for quality and importance in accordance with these Assessment standards. My previous scale of assessment of articles has been mainly based on the percentage content of articles, with the assumption of a complete article being somewhere between class GA and B on the Quality scale in the Assessment project.
The overall progress for Melbourne suburbs, as at 12 April, 2007, is now estimated at 39%. My guesstimate is that 24 articles are virtually complete, 115 are over 50% complete, 209 are between 20 and 50% complete, 116 are stubs and 19 have not been started. - Cuddy Wifter 01:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cuddy Wifter 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I have taken a look at progress for Melbourne suburbs articles which, as at January 17, 2008, I estimate at 44% complete. My guesstimate is that 26 articles are virtually complete, 143 are over 50% complete, 190 are between 45 and 25% complete, 107 are basic stubs and 17 have not been started. Anyone looking to "adopt" a Melbourne related article should check out any of the above list of suburbs which are mostly still stubs. Cuddy Wifter ( talk) 20:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)