Hi! I am revising the files uploaded for Wiki Science Competition 2017 and I have noticed this one. Such picture of the interior of a small domen will never be a finalist of course, but I am trying to improve its categorization and description like I did with other ones. It has a shape of a some regular solid, it could be the sort of image it is used in a school text book to show how geometry appears in real life, for example.
So, if you had to put a specific category related to a polyhedric shape, which one would it be in your opinion? thank you in advance.-- Alexmar983 ( talk) 12:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A Request-for-Comment has been opened at Talk:209 (number) which may be of interest to the community here. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Comments and concerns are welcome. Please join in the discussion here. Derek M ( talk) 23:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I just ran across this article. Is that a thing? I can't seem to find much in google or google scholar that isn't authored by the user, who apparently admits COI, or isn't simply copied wiki content or print-on-demand of wiki content. There was also a discussion in the nLab forum inquiring about the notability of the topic. Is this too OR for our taste? It doesn't seem like more than one or two people have written about it. Rschwieb ( talk) 14:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Could someone cast a glance over Draft:Spread(Intuitionism) and see at what level of readiness for mainspace it is. Many thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Strangely, I did not find any result of the form "derivative of the limit is equal to the limit of derivatives whenever...". Neither in real analysis nor in complex analysis. Are they really not there on Wikipedia, or did I look for them in the wrong places? (I do not mean termwise differentiation of a power series, this is too special.) Boris Tsirelson ( talk) 18:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
The new article titled Topological geometry, if indeed it ought to exist, could certainly use some work. Michael Hardy ( talk) 04:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The IP 73.46.49.164 insists to link Interconnectedness, an article, certainly not covered by mathematical ideas, within the article Chaos theory, which has an explicit hat note, guiding to alternatives to mathematical treatment via a disambiguation page, and is of interest for WikiProject Mathematics. For to me not obvious reasons the article is also tagged with being of interest for WikiProject Religion, but I am unsure, if this should be discussed at all, and if yes, where.
I did discuss this linking already at the TP, but the IP started to insert this link again, without discussing, just claiming it were correct. Within this second effort I already reverted twice and asked for discussion again, but now I want to bring the situation there to the awareness of the project. Purgy ( talk) 08:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Will someone please review Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator and advise whether it should be accepted as an article? Please remember that the acceptance criterion is not whether the draft is a Good Article, but only whether it is mathematically sound, and whether it is worth keeping as an article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
In several articles, including Exact sequence, Cokernel, Snake lemma, and others, user Cedar101 has replaced, for exact sequences, the standard markup <math> by <ce> (or some variants of it), which is a markup with a uncommon syntax that he has implemented. The resulting rendering is correct, but the resulting source code in no more latex but a language that is unreadable for most of us. I have reverted him once, but, for avoiding edit warring, a consensus is needed about the use of this markup in mathematics. My opinion is that the use of <ce> is WP:disruptive editing, as it makes very time consuming to modify the involved exact sequences. But this is only my opinion, and a consensus is needed in favor or against the following assertion
The use in mathematics of <ce>, or of any of its variants is disruptive editing.
D.Lazard ( talk) 10:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
<ce>
for things which are not chemical equations is semantically incorrect, and should be replaced by the proper <math>
syntax.
Helder 11:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)I invite any interested editors to join this discussion about the page Linear differential equation. Loraof ( talk) 17:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
David Eppstein has recently nominated Prime number for a Good Article. I will begin reviewing the article in the next few days, but more reviewers are more than welcome! Leave your review at Talk:Prime_number/GA1. Jakob.scholbach ( talk) 14:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I have for a long time thought that wikipedia's article on stokes' theorem was inadequate. The first equation of the article is completely incomprehensible to me in terms of applying it to an example. If you know anything about multivariable calculus or vector calculus please help! Brian Everlasting ( talk) 20:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Please help to review Draft:Binary Tiling a very brief draft at AFC. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 16:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Hi! I am revising the files uploaded for Wiki Science Competition 2017 and I have noticed this one. Such picture of the interior of a small domen will never be a finalist of course, but I am trying to improve its categorization and description like I did with other ones. It has a shape of a some regular solid, it could be the sort of image it is used in a school text book to show how geometry appears in real life, for example.
So, if you had to put a specific category related to a polyhedric shape, which one would it be in your opinion? thank you in advance.-- Alexmar983 ( talk) 12:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A Request-for-Comment has been opened at Talk:209 (number) which may be of interest to the community here. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Comments and concerns are welcome. Please join in the discussion here. Derek M ( talk) 23:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I just ran across this article. Is that a thing? I can't seem to find much in google or google scholar that isn't authored by the user, who apparently admits COI, or isn't simply copied wiki content or print-on-demand of wiki content. There was also a discussion in the nLab forum inquiring about the notability of the topic. Is this too OR for our taste? It doesn't seem like more than one or two people have written about it. Rschwieb ( talk) 14:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Could someone cast a glance over Draft:Spread(Intuitionism) and see at what level of readiness for mainspace it is. Many thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Strangely, I did not find any result of the form "derivative of the limit is equal to the limit of derivatives whenever...". Neither in real analysis nor in complex analysis. Are they really not there on Wikipedia, or did I look for them in the wrong places? (I do not mean termwise differentiation of a power series, this is too special.) Boris Tsirelson ( talk) 18:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
The new article titled Topological geometry, if indeed it ought to exist, could certainly use some work. Michael Hardy ( talk) 04:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The IP 73.46.49.164 insists to link Interconnectedness, an article, certainly not covered by mathematical ideas, within the article Chaos theory, which has an explicit hat note, guiding to alternatives to mathematical treatment via a disambiguation page, and is of interest for WikiProject Mathematics. For to me not obvious reasons the article is also tagged with being of interest for WikiProject Religion, but I am unsure, if this should be discussed at all, and if yes, where.
I did discuss this linking already at the TP, but the IP started to insert this link again, without discussing, just claiming it were correct. Within this second effort I already reverted twice and asked for discussion again, but now I want to bring the situation there to the awareness of the project. Purgy ( talk) 08:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Will someone please review Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator and advise whether it should be accepted as an article? Please remember that the acceptance criterion is not whether the draft is a Good Article, but only whether it is mathematically sound, and whether it is worth keeping as an article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
In several articles, including Exact sequence, Cokernel, Snake lemma, and others, user Cedar101 has replaced, for exact sequences, the standard markup <math> by <ce> (or some variants of it), which is a markup with a uncommon syntax that he has implemented. The resulting rendering is correct, but the resulting source code in no more latex but a language that is unreadable for most of us. I have reverted him once, but, for avoiding edit warring, a consensus is needed about the use of this markup in mathematics. My opinion is that the use of <ce> is WP:disruptive editing, as it makes very time consuming to modify the involved exact sequences. But this is only my opinion, and a consensus is needed in favor or against the following assertion
The use in mathematics of <ce>, or of any of its variants is disruptive editing.
D.Lazard ( talk) 10:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
<ce>
for things which are not chemical equations is semantically incorrect, and should be replaced by the proper <math>
syntax.
Helder 11:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)I invite any interested editors to join this discussion about the page Linear differential equation. Loraof ( talk) 17:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
David Eppstein has recently nominated Prime number for a Good Article. I will begin reviewing the article in the next few days, but more reviewers are more than welcome! Leave your review at Talk:Prime_number/GA1. Jakob.scholbach ( talk) 14:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I have for a long time thought that wikipedia's article on stokes' theorem was inadequate. The first equation of the article is completely incomprehensible to me in terms of applying it to an example. If you know anything about multivariable calculus or vector calculus please help! Brian Everlasting ( talk) 20:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Please help to review Draft:Binary Tiling a very brief draft at AFC. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 16:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |