This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject India/Assessment page. |
|
![]() | India Project‑class | ||||||
|
I think for the FA class, we can directly add all the India related FAs from bolded articles in selected articles or Indian Notice board. We still need to judiciosly select them as some might be disputed (like Jinnah in WP:INWNB and Norman Borlaug in WP:PINSA). — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 15:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Is the rating on importance at the discretion of the reviewer, or there is a formal process of getting an informed decision on it. I am eagerly waiting for this answer as this question is preventing me from adding the details to over a couple of dozen pages. — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 16:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
It looks from the general arrangement of assessors that the assessment is absolutely arbitrary and any two members may assess the same article differently. I feel the original writers be consulted while assessing any article to know that view point. Importance of an article varies as per the view point of the reader. Pathare Prabhu ( talk) 06:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I have found that quite a few articles (like Kochi and Ladakh) are either above or equivalent to {{ GA-Class}}. However, the assessment procedures prohibit such an assessment unless the articles are listed as good. Noting that they are seriously in line for the FAC soon, how should we go ahead while assessing them? — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 09:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I have assessed all Indian states' articles as per the guidelines given. On importance scale, I have marked all as "Top". — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 09:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Ganeshk assessed this article as Mid-importance. Nobleeagle re-assessed it as high importance. I feel that though this might be a top priority article now (because of its visibility), a few months down the line, very few people will be intereted in it. Apart from the fact that this article made breaking news, there is no long-term importance of this article for WikiProject India, and hence should be rated as Mid-importance. — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 10:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
While assessing politics articles, I am rating them of high importance if they are concerned with national level politics. For regional, I am rating mid and for local/federations etc, I am rating as low. -- Lost (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For politicians, PM/ Union Cabinet Ministers = Top importance, CM/ governor/ MPs = High, MLA/ Ex CM etc = Mid/ Others = Low -- Lost (talk) 08:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Would the lists classify as Non Articles for the purpose of assessment? -- Lost (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I have begun assessing HOI articles and am using the following rationale for importance:
Please let me know if there is disagreement on this -- Lost (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
— Lost (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
All those assessing articles, please see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MartinBotII — Lost (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
This article may have various quality issues. Please review the article and provide your feedback. See also Foreign influence on Chinese martial arts. Freedom skies| talk 13:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I believe there are instances of gross inaccuracies in the rating of some Wikipedia articles by importance.. I point out the following example: Aamir Khan has the highest importance rating ('top') and the article for an established and important Indian icon such as Rabindranath Tagore has an importance rating one notch lower ('high'). I strongly call for a review of the ratings of these articles. One would think that Rabindranath Tagore's article merits a 'top' importance, while Aamir Khan's would be at 'mid'-level importance. AppleJuggler 06:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Since WikiProject Indian television is the newest workgroup there needs to be a statistics table for it because there are hundreds of articles on the Wikipedia mainsapce that fall into the category of Indian Television. I need someone's help to arrange this for me. Thanks - Bhavesh.Chauhan 18:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Address
Madhapuram (Post) or Madapuram Tallampadu (Via) Mudigonda (Mandal) Khammam (Dist) Andhra Pradesh (State) India Pin code : 507170
Madhapuram Population Data
Households: 625 , Total Population: 2,560 , Male Population: 1,298 , Female Population: 1,262 , Kids Under 6 Yrs: 312 , Boys Under 6 Yrs: 167 , Girls Under 6 Yrs: 145 , Total Literates: 1,300 , Total Illeterates: 1,260
Web Map/Driving directions
http://mapmyindia.com/embed_preview.jsp?x=-1097103.375&y=4914701.5&z=9&width=800&height=400
Land Records
http://apland.ap.nic.in/DistPahani.asp?dcode=22&mc=41&vc=1&mname=MUDIGONDA&dname=Khammam
School Information
M.P.Primary School http://projects.cgg.gov.in/dsemis/School.do?&mgtcode=1&schlcode=2241001&count=1
Z.P.High School
http://projects.cgg.gov.in/dsemis/School.do?&mgtcode=1&schlcode=2241601&count=1
MPTC Election Result Winner = Morthala Hanimi Reddy (INC) , Runner = Annem Gurava Reddy CPI(M)
SARPANCH Election Result
Winner = Maddineni ?? (INC) , Runner = Annem Gurava Reddy CPI(M)
DISTRICT WISE BEST BI-VOLTINE FARMER AWARD ON THE EVE OF SANKRANTHI 2007 in Sericulture Sri. M.HanimiReddy
DISTRICT WISE BEST MULTI-VOLTINE FARMER AWARD ON THE EVE OF SANKRANTHI 2007 Sri. Gopireddy Rami Reddy
FREEDOM FIGHTERS 1) Linga Reddy Yarabolu (S/o Atchi Reddy) , 2) Rami Reddy Sareddy (S/o Obul Reddy )
Please enclose if you have any additional information.
Bye Hanimi R Mortala
Atlanta
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_Of_Madhapuram_Khammam" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanimi m ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I have edited the Constitution of India article significantly. I am currently running low on material and ideas. I am inviting and requesting help from anyone who can help expanding this article. Thanks. Sumanch ( talk) 09:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I think expanding part would be a nice idea. There could be an introduction to each of them atleast and depending on user contribution, each can be detailed and expanded. In fact I notice that for some of these parts there is no wiki reference at all. Priority can be given to those. Cheers. Tarun2k ( talk) 10:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira and Ramakrishna Mission Residential College, this two articles need assessment. Nobody is objecting there.-- NAH ID 10:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
There is a registered book Brhmaand Pujan written in 1999 from a well known writer of India Naresh Sonee. Notability issue could be sorted/verified out from this site-
Your good selves can go through the same and verifiy for assertments. The author has introduced a self based unique logical philosophy one of it's kind. Presently, how can I re put some information again on wikipedia. As time & again it get deleted on bias by a certain community in wiki ? Can you put my case/cause across wikiIndian portal members or Chairman of wikipedia? Or if possible can you put the same pages again by editing them as required picking up from wikibin promoting the sames. Regard -- Dralansun ( talk) 10:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Defns available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism/Assessment. Please update the {{ WP India}} template.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 11:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
It is not a WikiProject Hinduism/Assessment decision, but that of
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment, also restrictions on B class, now apply to all articles.--
Redtigerxyz (
talk)
14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Discussion is ongoing at WP:India on the introduction of C-class for assessment. Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#C class articles. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I changed the method of participating. See it on the page itself.-- Ankit Maity 07:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could someone from your assessment team please drop by and apply your rating for your project work on importance scale at Talk:The Doon School. At WP:WPSCH we currently have this article, a recently failed GA, rated as Top Importance, but of course not all projects are obliged to accord the same importance level withing the scope of their work. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Can any one update the examples in the Assessment Chart with latest Indian articles? Most of the examples are of 2007, when the criteria was much loose. Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I have been trying to request an assessment of article Verinag for a period of a week. Every time i edit this page for requesting an assessment, an error occurs. The details of the latest error are as follows: Request: POST http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment&action=submit, from 208.80.154.9 via cp1018.eqiad.wmnet (squid/2.7.STABLE9) to 10.64.0.142 (10.64.0.142) Error: ERR_READ_TIMEOUT, errno [No Error] at Sun, 13 Oct 2013 08:51:13 GMT Akshey25 ( talk) 08:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Judging by the above posts, I'm not alone in experiencing errors while making edits to this page. This happened to me some months ago on this very specific page, I wonder what's wrong with it? - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 09:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
The page information warned that there were too many templates transcluded here. Removed. Apparently that was causing the errors. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 23:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
From Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 59#Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Assessment proposal and possible revival, {{ WP INDIA}} was modified and the way of manually assessing was agreed to be removed. Will update this page and post here. -Joel. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 22:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
IT WAS MY BIG MISTAKE THAT I TRUSTED FLIPKART. 103.210.67.223 ( talk) 11:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Open your business forum now.Just Say "EE" abbreviated from SeTswana means "Yes"/"EE".Amooketsi from South Africa . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.190.248 ( talk) 19:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject India/Assessment page. |
|
![]() | India Project‑class | ||||||
|
I think for the FA class, we can directly add all the India related FAs from bolded articles in selected articles or Indian Notice board. We still need to judiciosly select them as some might be disputed (like Jinnah in WP:INWNB and Norman Borlaug in WP:PINSA). — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 15:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Is the rating on importance at the discretion of the reviewer, or there is a formal process of getting an informed decision on it. I am eagerly waiting for this answer as this question is preventing me from adding the details to over a couple of dozen pages. — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 16:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
It looks from the general arrangement of assessors that the assessment is absolutely arbitrary and any two members may assess the same article differently. I feel the original writers be consulted while assessing any article to know that view point. Importance of an article varies as per the view point of the reader. Pathare Prabhu ( talk) 06:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I have found that quite a few articles (like Kochi and Ladakh) are either above or equivalent to {{ GA-Class}}. However, the assessment procedures prohibit such an assessment unless the articles are listed as good. Noting that they are seriously in line for the FAC soon, how should we go ahead while assessing them? — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 09:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I have assessed all Indian states' articles as per the guidelines given. On importance scale, I have marked all as "Top". — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 09:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Ganeshk assessed this article as Mid-importance. Nobleeagle re-assessed it as high importance. I feel that though this might be a top priority article now (because of its visibility), a few months down the line, very few people will be intereted in it. Apart from the fact that this article made breaking news, there is no long-term importance of this article for WikiProject India, and hence should be rated as Mid-importance. — Ambuj Saxena ( talk) 10:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
While assessing politics articles, I am rating them of high importance if they are concerned with national level politics. For regional, I am rating mid and for local/federations etc, I am rating as low. -- Lost (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For politicians, PM/ Union Cabinet Ministers = Top importance, CM/ governor/ MPs = High, MLA/ Ex CM etc = Mid/ Others = Low -- Lost (talk) 08:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Would the lists classify as Non Articles for the purpose of assessment? -- Lost (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I have begun assessing HOI articles and am using the following rationale for importance:
Please let me know if there is disagreement on this -- Lost (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
— Lost (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
All those assessing articles, please see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MartinBotII — Lost (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
This article may have various quality issues. Please review the article and provide your feedback. See also Foreign influence on Chinese martial arts. Freedom skies| talk 13:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I believe there are instances of gross inaccuracies in the rating of some Wikipedia articles by importance.. I point out the following example: Aamir Khan has the highest importance rating ('top') and the article for an established and important Indian icon such as Rabindranath Tagore has an importance rating one notch lower ('high'). I strongly call for a review of the ratings of these articles. One would think that Rabindranath Tagore's article merits a 'top' importance, while Aamir Khan's would be at 'mid'-level importance. AppleJuggler 06:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Since WikiProject Indian television is the newest workgroup there needs to be a statistics table for it because there are hundreds of articles on the Wikipedia mainsapce that fall into the category of Indian Television. I need someone's help to arrange this for me. Thanks - Bhavesh.Chauhan 18:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Address
Madhapuram (Post) or Madapuram Tallampadu (Via) Mudigonda (Mandal) Khammam (Dist) Andhra Pradesh (State) India Pin code : 507170
Madhapuram Population Data
Households: 625 , Total Population: 2,560 , Male Population: 1,298 , Female Population: 1,262 , Kids Under 6 Yrs: 312 , Boys Under 6 Yrs: 167 , Girls Under 6 Yrs: 145 , Total Literates: 1,300 , Total Illeterates: 1,260
Web Map/Driving directions
http://mapmyindia.com/embed_preview.jsp?x=-1097103.375&y=4914701.5&z=9&width=800&height=400
Land Records
http://apland.ap.nic.in/DistPahani.asp?dcode=22&mc=41&vc=1&mname=MUDIGONDA&dname=Khammam
School Information
M.P.Primary School http://projects.cgg.gov.in/dsemis/School.do?&mgtcode=1&schlcode=2241001&count=1
Z.P.High School
http://projects.cgg.gov.in/dsemis/School.do?&mgtcode=1&schlcode=2241601&count=1
MPTC Election Result Winner = Morthala Hanimi Reddy (INC) , Runner = Annem Gurava Reddy CPI(M)
SARPANCH Election Result
Winner = Maddineni ?? (INC) , Runner = Annem Gurava Reddy CPI(M)
DISTRICT WISE BEST BI-VOLTINE FARMER AWARD ON THE EVE OF SANKRANTHI 2007 in Sericulture Sri. M.HanimiReddy
DISTRICT WISE BEST MULTI-VOLTINE FARMER AWARD ON THE EVE OF SANKRANTHI 2007 Sri. Gopireddy Rami Reddy
FREEDOM FIGHTERS 1) Linga Reddy Yarabolu (S/o Atchi Reddy) , 2) Rami Reddy Sareddy (S/o Obul Reddy )
Please enclose if you have any additional information.
Bye Hanimi R Mortala
Atlanta
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_Of_Madhapuram_Khammam" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanimi m ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I have edited the Constitution of India article significantly. I am currently running low on material and ideas. I am inviting and requesting help from anyone who can help expanding this article. Thanks. Sumanch ( talk) 09:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I think expanding part would be a nice idea. There could be an introduction to each of them atleast and depending on user contribution, each can be detailed and expanded. In fact I notice that for some of these parts there is no wiki reference at all. Priority can be given to those. Cheers. Tarun2k ( talk) 10:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira and Ramakrishna Mission Residential College, this two articles need assessment. Nobody is objecting there.-- NAH ID 10:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
There is a registered book Brhmaand Pujan written in 1999 from a well known writer of India Naresh Sonee. Notability issue could be sorted/verified out from this site-
Your good selves can go through the same and verifiy for assertments. The author has introduced a self based unique logical philosophy one of it's kind. Presently, how can I re put some information again on wikipedia. As time & again it get deleted on bias by a certain community in wiki ? Can you put my case/cause across wikiIndian portal members or Chairman of wikipedia? Or if possible can you put the same pages again by editing them as required picking up from wikibin promoting the sames. Regard -- Dralansun ( talk) 10:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Defns available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism/Assessment. Please update the {{ WP India}} template.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 11:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
It is not a WikiProject Hinduism/Assessment decision, but that of
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment, also restrictions on B class, now apply to all articles.--
Redtigerxyz (
talk)
14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Discussion is ongoing at WP:India on the introduction of C-class for assessment. Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#C class articles. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I changed the method of participating. See it on the page itself.-- Ankit Maity 07:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could someone from your assessment team please drop by and apply your rating for your project work on importance scale at Talk:The Doon School. At WP:WPSCH we currently have this article, a recently failed GA, rated as Top Importance, but of course not all projects are obliged to accord the same importance level withing the scope of their work. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Can any one update the examples in the Assessment Chart with latest Indian articles? Most of the examples are of 2007, when the criteria was much loose. Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I have been trying to request an assessment of article Verinag for a period of a week. Every time i edit this page for requesting an assessment, an error occurs. The details of the latest error are as follows: Request: POST http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment&action=submit, from 208.80.154.9 via cp1018.eqiad.wmnet (squid/2.7.STABLE9) to 10.64.0.142 (10.64.0.142) Error: ERR_READ_TIMEOUT, errno [No Error] at Sun, 13 Oct 2013 08:51:13 GMT Akshey25 ( talk) 08:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Judging by the above posts, I'm not alone in experiencing errors while making edits to this page. This happened to me some months ago on this very specific page, I wonder what's wrong with it? - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 09:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
The page information warned that there were too many templates transcluded here. Removed. Apparently that was causing the errors. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 23:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
From Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 59#Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Assessment proposal and possible revival, {{ WP INDIA}} was modified and the way of manually assessing was agreed to be removed. Will update this page and post here. -Joel. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 22:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
IT WAS MY BIG MISTAKE THAT I TRUSTED FLIPKART. 103.210.67.223 ( talk) 11:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Open your business forum now.Just Say "EE" abbreviated from SeTswana means "Yes"/"EE".Amooketsi from South Africa . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.190.248 ( talk) 19:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)