I thought it would be nice if this participant list was alphabetized and the users were listed as such:
Any opinions on this?
The signing up page is a little confusing, can someone explain please?
BenjaminTeague123456 —Preceding unsigned comment added by BenjaminTeague123456 ( talk • contribs) 11:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Please can someone remove me from the inactive participants list - the page is too big to edit on my phone (no PC atm). Thanks. — Gary Kirk // talk! 22:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Should we remove people from the list who aren't actually active? John Reaves 09:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I find it incredibly hard to believe that the project isn't finished with 116 active editors! Time to call a roll call I think to see who's actually still going - any objections? Happy-melon 15:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I would like to introduce participant number to arrange the member list easily. KyleR Giggs 13:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I was under the impression that this list was to be maintained in chronological order, with oldest additions at the top and newest at the bottom. The reasons for wanting a chronological list are simple and multiple, principal among them are:
There are other reasons that I can think of - I'm sure you can too. However I can see no such advantages to an alphabetical list save that it is easier to see if a particular user is a member of the project. With the miracle of Ctrl-F (aka the find function) that is not much of an advantage. Can we decide which system we're going to use before the list gets any longer? If we resume chronological, I will go back through the edit history and work out who came first, but I'm only going to do that once!! Happy-melon 17:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Chronological
Alphabetical
Member ID
Comment: Do we really need a specific order? I say we keep it simple, tell new users to add their names to the bottom of the list, and don't waste time reordering. :) PeaceNT 04:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Umm... why on Earth is everyone listed as inactive? -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 16:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Yes, can someone please fix this? I am fairly new so I am not sure how to solve this issue where everyone is listed as inactive. R.M. 221 ( talk) 16:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I thought it would be nice if this participant list was alphabetized and the users were listed as such:
Any opinions on this?
The signing up page is a little confusing, can someone explain please?
BenjaminTeague123456 —Preceding unsigned comment added by BenjaminTeague123456 ( talk • contribs) 11:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Please can someone remove me from the inactive participants list - the page is too big to edit on my phone (no PC atm). Thanks. — Gary Kirk // talk! 22:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Should we remove people from the list who aren't actually active? John Reaves 09:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I find it incredibly hard to believe that the project isn't finished with 116 active editors! Time to call a roll call I think to see who's actually still going - any objections? Happy-melon 15:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I would like to introduce participant number to arrange the member list easily. KyleR Giggs 13:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I was under the impression that this list was to be maintained in chronological order, with oldest additions at the top and newest at the bottom. The reasons for wanting a chronological list are simple and multiple, principal among them are:
There are other reasons that I can think of - I'm sure you can too. However I can see no such advantages to an alphabetical list save that it is easier to see if a particular user is a member of the project. With the miracle of Ctrl-F (aka the find function) that is not much of an advantage. Can we decide which system we're going to use before the list gets any longer? If we resume chronological, I will go back through the edit history and work out who came first, but I'm only going to do that once!! Happy-melon 17:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Chronological
Alphabetical
Member ID
Comment: Do we really need a specific order? I say we keep it simple, tell new users to add their names to the bottom of the list, and don't waste time reordering. :) PeaceNT 04:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Umm... why on Earth is everyone listed as inactive? -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 16:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Yes, can someone please fix this? I am fairly new so I am not sure how to solve this issue where everyone is listed as inactive. R.M. 221 ( talk) 16:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)