This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
That takes all the articles linked on List of Halo media and puts them in a topic. We would only need to get 6 articles to GA (and one of them, Halo 2 OST, is a current nom). 3 of the articles haven't been released so would need the tick. It doesn't actually seem that far away with more than enough featured articles already. James086 Talk | Email 05:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
←Yeah that's fine, "publications" was just the word I came up with during a mental blank. Media sounds better because ilovebees was hardly published. I've changed the title on the box above. James086 Talk | Email 16:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
← I think one marketing article for all 3 main games (or even the series as a whole) would be unnecessary as Halo 2 and 1 had trivial marketing compared to number 3. The marketing article by itself is definitely notable, Marketing for Halo 3#Impact is filled with secondary sources (independent of Bungie and Microsoft thus meeting the notability requirements). James086 Talk | Email 12:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
There are only four remaining articles on the fiction of Halo, and here are my thoughts on them;
Thoughts? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Is Factions of Halo considered a list or an article? It's probably closer to an article, but it could almost go either way. Black ngold29 06:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Anyone want to work with me on getting Halo Original Soundtrack and Halo 2 Original Soundtrack up to GAs? Both have a decent amount of info, but there is also some Original reaseach as to the contents of the music (I understand that there are songs/themes on the soundtracks from other games, etc., but unless it is sourced it should be removed). If two or three of us go at them together it shouldn't take more than a few weeks. Plus, if both get GA then we could probably get the "Halo Music" up to a featured catagory. I've got all the soundtracks, so referencing booklets, etc. won't be a problem. Thanks! Black ngold29 04:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Halo OST just passed its GA. Thanks to everyone who worked on it before me, because you provided all the sources I needed. I'll get to H2 in a little bit, gotta finish a few other projects first. Black ngold29 01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot ( Disable) 21:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
If we choose to use C-class (and I don't see why not), I think the following articles would become C-class:
Any thoughts? James086 Talk | Email 06:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Just bringing this article up here for wider review. It was recently made, primarily edited by one user, and cites no sources other than a YouTube video of dubious legitimacy. I haven't found anything new on the movie, but I can't be sure one way or the other yet. If I had to make a conclusion, I'd say the article will have nothing new and needs to be either deleted or redirected (the less practical option if the movie is completely dead), but I'll wait a bit before acting. Maybe someone more familiar with the whole thing can be more decisive. -- Comandante {Talk} 03:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Flood (Halo) has been bothering me for some time. Good news is, thanks to access to ProQuest and some other random sources I found, with a revamp it might meet the criteria. I'm going to add in the sources I've found (I got an awesome quote from Rolling Stone magazine comparing the twist of the Flood in Halo: CE to the dots attacking Pac-Man) and then all we need to do is check the reliable sources, copyediting and make sure it's out-of-universe (comprehensible to the non-Halo player.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 21:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I believe Music of Halo now meets the Featured topic criteria. I've never nominated one before so I just wanted to confirm it here. It's been previously discussed that Martin O'Donnell and Michael Salvatori could be added to the topic as well. It makes the most sense to me to go ahead with getting the FT now and then adding O'Donnell and Salvatori after they are improved. Thoughts? Black ngold29 02:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
We should add him to our project officially, so that with him and Jason Jones, who are the co-founders of Bungie, and with the Bungie article added in, we could eventually have a Bungie featured topic :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 20:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I went ahead and nom'd it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flood (Halo). Third time's the charm, they say... if you guys can lend a hand when concerns come up, it'd be greatly appreciated. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 15:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I think we all recognize that this is essentially the core article of the project, and we have reached somewhat of a consensus that it is close to an FA, but not there yet. I recently put the article up for peer review. I had prose and wording in mind more than references, as it seemed to be one of the biggest problems in the article's latest FA review. Unfortunately, the two people that responded concentrated on the references. I don't have a very long history with the article, and while I do know what I'm talking about when it comes to Halo, I'm not so up on the newest specifics. Especially when it comes to sourcing minor info. I think we should go through the whole article section by section and find its core and exactly what should be concentrated on; this should clear up the repeated info problem as well. By doing this will probably increase the time before its FAC, but I believe it will create the best possible article, which is exactly what we're trying to achieve, right? Black ngold29 04:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I re-ordered the page and contacted a few people who reviewed the page on it's last FAC. Hopefully that'll give us some more feedback. I'm gonna keep cleaning up when I can. Black ngold29 03:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to do a decent featured topic image for 'Halo media' to replace the somewhat-crappy placeholder I made; anyone have any ideas about what such a descriptive image for "halo media" should be? I've tried a combination of books, discs, etc, but the issue is that it should be around 60px horizontal at spec size, and simpler gives us more detail. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 21:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've scoured the internet for more info on development/background for Halo: First Strike but I just can't find anything. I want to get it to GA but I don't think there's enough info already there for it to be counted as comprehensive. There's only one source at the moment and it's rather weedy. Also any copy-editing would be much appreciated but it's the development info that's needed most. Thanks, James086 Talk | Email 12:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
If anyone is interested I own both Halo: First Strike & Ghosts of Onyx. Dont know how much help I can be but let me know and Ill see what I can do. Dark Destroyer of Worlds ( talk) 00:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't List of Halo 3 Weapons be deleted or merged into Halo 3? Seems pretty pointless to me. Thoughts? Black ngold29 22:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps instead of launching this one, we could add in both the halo superstructure article and the SPARTAN project article, and call it "Universe of Halo", or "Fictional Universe of Halo". We could even do a "Fictional world of Halo" topic merged with the character featured topic to cover all the fiction articles in one topic. I just had this thought, others? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 03:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I suppose we could talk about this all day, but we should probably work on the articles instead, heh. I started doing a few other things, but should have time this week to go through Halo (series) for a few c/e runs. Anyone want to help or work on I Love Bees, Halo: Uprising, or Marketing for Halo 3? Black ngold29 01:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
So we just have to get Halo megastructure, SPARTAN Project, and Factions of Halo to GA, and this one will be done too. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Bungie has, in case you didn't know, a trove of info at Bungie Publications (if not for the presentation, I never would have had enough info to boost Flood to FA.) A few of them (three to four, actually) deal with AI behaviors in Halo and its sequels, e.g. [1] and such. My question is, should/could this go in Factions of Halo and its child pages? On one hand, it's somewhat tangental to the design, and its more technical. Then again, we can and are talking about AI in the reception (so far, and there is much more to be mined) so it makes sense talking about how they came to be. Thoughts? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 02:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Bringing me new hope to possibly expand or up some of our middling or seemingly-stuck-at-GA articles, announced at Comic-Con there will be Prima's Halo 3 Art Book- it's essentially the Art of Halo, updated (and hopefully since it's by Prima, will have more content than pretty pictures.) I'm going to try and grab a copy when it comes out in September(?) so this should be a huge help to bolstering articles. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Has Nothing To Do With List of Halo vehicles, Therefore Should Not Redirect There. I Worked On That Article For Several Hours. KP317
Dear WikiProject Halo participants.... WikiProject Xbox is currently looking for more help editing Xbox and Xbox 360 related articles, and considering the fact that you are a WikiProject Halo member, we ask for your help. You can sign up here. Thanks. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 00:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Getting back to the 0.7 stuff, what we need to do is fill out the proper information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Wikipedia 0.7 workshop. When a good oldid is found (I suggest holding off on Halo 3 until we figure out how to address the DLC/updates) add it at User:SelectionBot/0.7/V-3. And then we're done. Just make sure the oldid's are the best possible :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this article ( List of Halo Vehicles) and the several articles it has links to (should be 4 or 5 right now, looks like more are planned) against the notablility poilicy or something? I thought I'd point this out here, since I don't really know how to deal with articles like this (I mainly edit every now and then, never tried a deletion thing). Sorry for kind of pushing this on you, but I knew I had to bring it up somewhere for more expereienced users to look at. Thanks, Rigamarole's Needle ( talk) 22:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigamarole's Needle ( talk • contribs)
I (think) I'm going to actually sit down, cleanup, expand, and promote this article to GA. But I was thinking: wouldn't a less clunky title be Halo 3 marketing? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I started thinking about this when I had to decruftify the plot and gameplay of Halo 3, but it looks like Halo 2 could use some revamping as well. It was promoted back in April 2007, back when I was a relative newbie and standards at FAC were a bit more lax, and looking at it now it has numerous issues; while I've begun updating the sales info and other pertinent numbers:
Over the next few weeks (hopefully it won't take longer than that), I'm going to start reorganizing, cleaning, and adding to the article. Any help would be great. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I've been thinking... dangerous I know, but I've got my eye on revamping Covenant (Halo), slimming the appearances, expanding development and building reception, and I was wondering if we could merge Elite (Halo) back. I know it's a GA, but I think it could be easily handled in the space of the subheading; not to mention the content would go a long way towards building up the reception and marketing sections of the parent article.
Secondly, SPARTAN project; while there's info out there, I just haven't been able to find much in the way of development information. My thought is to bring back the Spartan subheading in Characters of Halo and cram in some of the relevant bits there.
Thoughts on the above? --03:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Is anyone willing to add the complete plotline in Halo: The Cole Protocol? I haven't read it, so I can't help with that yet, but has anyone else here read it? -- UNSC Trooper ( talk) 20:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
That takes all the articles linked on List of Halo media and puts them in a topic. We would only need to get 6 articles to GA (and one of them, Halo 2 OST, is a current nom). 3 of the articles haven't been released so would need the tick. It doesn't actually seem that far away with more than enough featured articles already. James086 Talk | Email 05:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
←Yeah that's fine, "publications" was just the word I came up with during a mental blank. Media sounds better because ilovebees was hardly published. I've changed the title on the box above. James086 Talk | Email 16:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
← I think one marketing article for all 3 main games (or even the series as a whole) would be unnecessary as Halo 2 and 1 had trivial marketing compared to number 3. The marketing article by itself is definitely notable, Marketing for Halo 3#Impact is filled with secondary sources (independent of Bungie and Microsoft thus meeting the notability requirements). James086 Talk | Email 12:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
There are only four remaining articles on the fiction of Halo, and here are my thoughts on them;
Thoughts? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Is Factions of Halo considered a list or an article? It's probably closer to an article, but it could almost go either way. Black ngold29 06:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Anyone want to work with me on getting Halo Original Soundtrack and Halo 2 Original Soundtrack up to GAs? Both have a decent amount of info, but there is also some Original reaseach as to the contents of the music (I understand that there are songs/themes on the soundtracks from other games, etc., but unless it is sourced it should be removed). If two or three of us go at them together it shouldn't take more than a few weeks. Plus, if both get GA then we could probably get the "Halo Music" up to a featured catagory. I've got all the soundtracks, so referencing booklets, etc. won't be a problem. Thanks! Black ngold29 04:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Halo OST just passed its GA. Thanks to everyone who worked on it before me, because you provided all the sources I needed. I'll get to H2 in a little bit, gotta finish a few other projects first. Black ngold29 01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot ( Disable) 21:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
If we choose to use C-class (and I don't see why not), I think the following articles would become C-class:
Any thoughts? James086 Talk | Email 06:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Just bringing this article up here for wider review. It was recently made, primarily edited by one user, and cites no sources other than a YouTube video of dubious legitimacy. I haven't found anything new on the movie, but I can't be sure one way or the other yet. If I had to make a conclusion, I'd say the article will have nothing new and needs to be either deleted or redirected (the less practical option if the movie is completely dead), but I'll wait a bit before acting. Maybe someone more familiar with the whole thing can be more decisive. -- Comandante {Talk} 03:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Flood (Halo) has been bothering me for some time. Good news is, thanks to access to ProQuest and some other random sources I found, with a revamp it might meet the criteria. I'm going to add in the sources I've found (I got an awesome quote from Rolling Stone magazine comparing the twist of the Flood in Halo: CE to the dots attacking Pac-Man) and then all we need to do is check the reliable sources, copyediting and make sure it's out-of-universe (comprehensible to the non-Halo player.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 21:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I believe Music of Halo now meets the Featured topic criteria. I've never nominated one before so I just wanted to confirm it here. It's been previously discussed that Martin O'Donnell and Michael Salvatori could be added to the topic as well. It makes the most sense to me to go ahead with getting the FT now and then adding O'Donnell and Salvatori after they are improved. Thoughts? Black ngold29 02:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
We should add him to our project officially, so that with him and Jason Jones, who are the co-founders of Bungie, and with the Bungie article added in, we could eventually have a Bungie featured topic :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 20:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I went ahead and nom'd it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flood (Halo). Third time's the charm, they say... if you guys can lend a hand when concerns come up, it'd be greatly appreciated. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 15:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I think we all recognize that this is essentially the core article of the project, and we have reached somewhat of a consensus that it is close to an FA, but not there yet. I recently put the article up for peer review. I had prose and wording in mind more than references, as it seemed to be one of the biggest problems in the article's latest FA review. Unfortunately, the two people that responded concentrated on the references. I don't have a very long history with the article, and while I do know what I'm talking about when it comes to Halo, I'm not so up on the newest specifics. Especially when it comes to sourcing minor info. I think we should go through the whole article section by section and find its core and exactly what should be concentrated on; this should clear up the repeated info problem as well. By doing this will probably increase the time before its FAC, but I believe it will create the best possible article, which is exactly what we're trying to achieve, right? Black ngold29 04:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I re-ordered the page and contacted a few people who reviewed the page on it's last FAC. Hopefully that'll give us some more feedback. I'm gonna keep cleaning up when I can. Black ngold29 03:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to do a decent featured topic image for 'Halo media' to replace the somewhat-crappy placeholder I made; anyone have any ideas about what such a descriptive image for "halo media" should be? I've tried a combination of books, discs, etc, but the issue is that it should be around 60px horizontal at spec size, and simpler gives us more detail. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 21:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've scoured the internet for more info on development/background for Halo: First Strike but I just can't find anything. I want to get it to GA but I don't think there's enough info already there for it to be counted as comprehensive. There's only one source at the moment and it's rather weedy. Also any copy-editing would be much appreciated but it's the development info that's needed most. Thanks, James086 Talk | Email 12:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
If anyone is interested I own both Halo: First Strike & Ghosts of Onyx. Dont know how much help I can be but let me know and Ill see what I can do. Dark Destroyer of Worlds ( talk) 00:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't List of Halo 3 Weapons be deleted or merged into Halo 3? Seems pretty pointless to me. Thoughts? Black ngold29 22:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps instead of launching this one, we could add in both the halo superstructure article and the SPARTAN project article, and call it "Universe of Halo", or "Fictional Universe of Halo". We could even do a "Fictional world of Halo" topic merged with the character featured topic to cover all the fiction articles in one topic. I just had this thought, others? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 03:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I suppose we could talk about this all day, but we should probably work on the articles instead, heh. I started doing a few other things, but should have time this week to go through Halo (series) for a few c/e runs. Anyone want to help or work on I Love Bees, Halo: Uprising, or Marketing for Halo 3? Black ngold29 01:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
So we just have to get Halo megastructure, SPARTAN Project, and Factions of Halo to GA, and this one will be done too. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Bungie has, in case you didn't know, a trove of info at Bungie Publications (if not for the presentation, I never would have had enough info to boost Flood to FA.) A few of them (three to four, actually) deal with AI behaviors in Halo and its sequels, e.g. [1] and such. My question is, should/could this go in Factions of Halo and its child pages? On one hand, it's somewhat tangental to the design, and its more technical. Then again, we can and are talking about AI in the reception (so far, and there is much more to be mined) so it makes sense talking about how they came to be. Thoughts? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 02:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Bringing me new hope to possibly expand or up some of our middling or seemingly-stuck-at-GA articles, announced at Comic-Con there will be Prima's Halo 3 Art Book- it's essentially the Art of Halo, updated (and hopefully since it's by Prima, will have more content than pretty pictures.) I'm going to try and grab a copy when it comes out in September(?) so this should be a huge help to bolstering articles. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Has Nothing To Do With List of Halo vehicles, Therefore Should Not Redirect There. I Worked On That Article For Several Hours. KP317
Dear WikiProject Halo participants.... WikiProject Xbox is currently looking for more help editing Xbox and Xbox 360 related articles, and considering the fact that you are a WikiProject Halo member, we ask for your help. You can sign up here. Thanks. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 00:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Getting back to the 0.7 stuff, what we need to do is fill out the proper information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Wikipedia 0.7 workshop. When a good oldid is found (I suggest holding off on Halo 3 until we figure out how to address the DLC/updates) add it at User:SelectionBot/0.7/V-3. And then we're done. Just make sure the oldid's are the best possible :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this article ( List of Halo Vehicles) and the several articles it has links to (should be 4 or 5 right now, looks like more are planned) against the notablility poilicy or something? I thought I'd point this out here, since I don't really know how to deal with articles like this (I mainly edit every now and then, never tried a deletion thing). Sorry for kind of pushing this on you, but I knew I had to bring it up somewhere for more expereienced users to look at. Thanks, Rigamarole's Needle ( talk) 22:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigamarole's Needle ( talk • contribs)
I (think) I'm going to actually sit down, cleanup, expand, and promote this article to GA. But I was thinking: wouldn't a less clunky title be Halo 3 marketing? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I started thinking about this when I had to decruftify the plot and gameplay of Halo 3, but it looks like Halo 2 could use some revamping as well. It was promoted back in April 2007, back when I was a relative newbie and standards at FAC were a bit more lax, and looking at it now it has numerous issues; while I've begun updating the sales info and other pertinent numbers:
Over the next few weeks (hopefully it won't take longer than that), I'm going to start reorganizing, cleaning, and adding to the article. Any help would be great. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I've been thinking... dangerous I know, but I've got my eye on revamping Covenant (Halo), slimming the appearances, expanding development and building reception, and I was wondering if we could merge Elite (Halo) back. I know it's a GA, but I think it could be easily handled in the space of the subheading; not to mention the content would go a long way towards building up the reception and marketing sections of the parent article.
Secondly, SPARTAN project; while there's info out there, I just haven't been able to find much in the way of development information. My thought is to bring back the Spartan subheading in Characters of Halo and cram in some of the relevant bits there.
Thoughts on the above? --03:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Is anyone willing to add the complete plotline in Halo: The Cole Protocol? I haven't read it, so I can't help with that yet, but has anyone else here read it? -- UNSC Trooper ( talk) 20:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)