![]() | Football Project‑class | ||||||
|
![]() |
Main pages |
---|
Football Assessment |
Format templates |
Other |
Has it won as it meet its target and it has the most votes -- Kingjamie 17:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
If a nomination doesn't get 3 votes in a week, is it deleted from the list? The Bayern Munich Junior/women have been there two days after they needed the three votes, so should I just delete them? King fish erswift 10:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Cool, cheers. King fish erswift 13:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
There's a few people for whom I post Template:FAIDuser on their talk page pretty much every week. I guess in these cases they already know about the AID and don't need reminding. So, if you do not wish to have
Dunga has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
appearing on your talk page when a new AID is selected, put your name here. Oldelpaso 12:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Let us know if you happen to pick an article on a person and we'll alert our members! plange 05:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
There has been a general decline in the number of editors working on the current AID each week, and I don't think it is attracting enough attention to justify making a new selection each week. Currently we only have two nominations, of which the leader has only 2 votes, and the current selection has only been worked on by 3 editors thus far. Perhaps the selection should be made fortnightly rather than weekly, thoughts? Oldelpaso 16:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
On the face of it Tobias Linderoth is due to be selected, but User:Dk-fck's only contribution is to make that vote, which strikes me as weird. Removing that vote would result in Tottenham Hotspur F.C. being selected. Oldelpaso 10:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I've seen quite a few football stadium articles and there isn't much in them. If there are any articles to focus on, it's the stadium articles. Kingjeff 11:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Just curious: the articles on Volkswagen Arena, Weserstadion, Åge Hareide, and Michel Platini were nominated on the same week. On their second week, the former three need at least 2 more votes, but the latter, which was nominated after the former three, needs 3 more. Why is this? T.I.A. -- ChaChaFut 02:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
It's a shame that the stadium articles I've nominated didn't get enough votes since those are the soccer articles that really need a lot of work on. Kingjeff 19:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Can people please add this ({{FootballIDRIVEpast}}) to the talk pages of old articles supported by the FootballDRIVE as it tells users which articles have been supported by the FootballDRIVE. Kingjamie 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
These days articles selected for the Football Article Improvement Drive get very little activity. It might be time to reform the nature of the Improvement Drive. What are people's thought about changes in emphasis? One possibility is making it more task based, e.g. "expand as many national team stubs to beyond stub level as possible", or "add references to articles about Golden Shoe winners". Oldelpaso 20:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
A thing I just noted in the AID for this WikiProject: lists are much more likely to be chosen as possible improvement drives rather than "real" articles. As we have an assessment department proposing quality and importance scales for articles associated to this WP, I suggest to take the list of higher-importance articles in a state of stub/start quality, and choose between them. -- Angelo 04:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
How about instead of nominating articles and see if they win, we nominate articles to be listed. Kingjeff 04:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
The current football collaboration of the week is Football club names. I have proposed an overhaul of the article, including a move and a reformatting, on the article's talk page. Please join the discussion at Talk:Football club names#Suggest restructuring. Cows fly kites (Aecis) Rule/ Contributions 11:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Apparently 'byline' is a lesser known sports term so it's up for AfD here [ [1]] Can anyone improve it to improve its chances of retention? Nick mallory 07:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
This collaboration appears to be inactive so I am removing it from the community portal. If this becomes active again just add it back.-- Banana 04:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I am beginning the process of expanding the Intertoto Cup. This is arguably the fourth most important tournament in European football, but very little information in contained in Wikipedia (and almost none before UEFA took over in 1995). My name is initially to complete every year 1961-present with introductions and relevant info, group tables, and scores from the knock-out rounds. I have also done a small amount of correction and addition to the Intertoto Cup page, and set up some key redirects that were not in existence previously. Hopefully by the time this season's tournament ends (in late July) I will have completed this process for all 47 seasons. This is rather fitting, as the Intertoto is being abolished after this year.
My 2 main sources are the RSSSF, and a private page of results (which you can find linked from the RSSSF). Plus my own records and, from 1995, UEFA records. There are far too many uncertainties and errors in the group-stage scores at the moment to include a grid with the scores in beside the tables - also, I feel this if pretty ineffective unless you can provide dates and venues for the games alongside (as happens post-1995). For this reason, I am only including the tables on their own currently.
Once all the seasons are finished, I will create some supplementary pages like 'List of clubs by appearances in the Intertoto Cup', 'Records and Firsts in the Intertoto Cup' and a page on changing formats. All advice to me is very much appreciated. HibeeJibee ( talk) 15:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm usually quite a fast learner when it comes to contributing to Wikipedia, but with this one, I'm stuck. I really have no clue how to create kit designs on the article and I was wondering if someone could change the Histon home kit. The home kit looks like this, [2], and was released today in the local newspaper. As far as I know, the shorts and socks are still the same colour, but could someone change the Histon kit to stripes as in the picture on the page? Thanks. Jazza5 ( talk) 17:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() | Football Project‑class | ||||||
|
![]() |
Main pages |
---|
Football Assessment |
Format templates |
Other |
Has it won as it meet its target and it has the most votes -- Kingjamie 17:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
If a nomination doesn't get 3 votes in a week, is it deleted from the list? The Bayern Munich Junior/women have been there two days after they needed the three votes, so should I just delete them? King fish erswift 10:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Cool, cheers. King fish erswift 13:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
There's a few people for whom I post Template:FAIDuser on their talk page pretty much every week. I guess in these cases they already know about the AID and don't need reminding. So, if you do not wish to have
Dunga has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
appearing on your talk page when a new AID is selected, put your name here. Oldelpaso 12:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Let us know if you happen to pick an article on a person and we'll alert our members! plange 05:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
There has been a general decline in the number of editors working on the current AID each week, and I don't think it is attracting enough attention to justify making a new selection each week. Currently we only have two nominations, of which the leader has only 2 votes, and the current selection has only been worked on by 3 editors thus far. Perhaps the selection should be made fortnightly rather than weekly, thoughts? Oldelpaso 16:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
On the face of it Tobias Linderoth is due to be selected, but User:Dk-fck's only contribution is to make that vote, which strikes me as weird. Removing that vote would result in Tottenham Hotspur F.C. being selected. Oldelpaso 10:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I've seen quite a few football stadium articles and there isn't much in them. If there are any articles to focus on, it's the stadium articles. Kingjeff 11:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Just curious: the articles on Volkswagen Arena, Weserstadion, Åge Hareide, and Michel Platini were nominated on the same week. On their second week, the former three need at least 2 more votes, but the latter, which was nominated after the former three, needs 3 more. Why is this? T.I.A. -- ChaChaFut 02:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
It's a shame that the stadium articles I've nominated didn't get enough votes since those are the soccer articles that really need a lot of work on. Kingjeff 19:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Can people please add this ({{FootballIDRIVEpast}}) to the talk pages of old articles supported by the FootballDRIVE as it tells users which articles have been supported by the FootballDRIVE. Kingjamie 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
These days articles selected for the Football Article Improvement Drive get very little activity. It might be time to reform the nature of the Improvement Drive. What are people's thought about changes in emphasis? One possibility is making it more task based, e.g. "expand as many national team stubs to beyond stub level as possible", or "add references to articles about Golden Shoe winners". Oldelpaso 20:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
A thing I just noted in the AID for this WikiProject: lists are much more likely to be chosen as possible improvement drives rather than "real" articles. As we have an assessment department proposing quality and importance scales for articles associated to this WP, I suggest to take the list of higher-importance articles in a state of stub/start quality, and choose between them. -- Angelo 04:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
How about instead of nominating articles and see if they win, we nominate articles to be listed. Kingjeff 04:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
The current football collaboration of the week is Football club names. I have proposed an overhaul of the article, including a move and a reformatting, on the article's talk page. Please join the discussion at Talk:Football club names#Suggest restructuring. Cows fly kites (Aecis) Rule/ Contributions 11:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Apparently 'byline' is a lesser known sports term so it's up for AfD here [ [1]] Can anyone improve it to improve its chances of retention? Nick mallory 07:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
This collaboration appears to be inactive so I am removing it from the community portal. If this becomes active again just add it back.-- Banana 04:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I am beginning the process of expanding the Intertoto Cup. This is arguably the fourth most important tournament in European football, but very little information in contained in Wikipedia (and almost none before UEFA took over in 1995). My name is initially to complete every year 1961-present with introductions and relevant info, group tables, and scores from the knock-out rounds. I have also done a small amount of correction and addition to the Intertoto Cup page, and set up some key redirects that were not in existence previously. Hopefully by the time this season's tournament ends (in late July) I will have completed this process for all 47 seasons. This is rather fitting, as the Intertoto is being abolished after this year.
My 2 main sources are the RSSSF, and a private page of results (which you can find linked from the RSSSF). Plus my own records and, from 1995, UEFA records. There are far too many uncertainties and errors in the group-stage scores at the moment to include a grid with the scores in beside the tables - also, I feel this if pretty ineffective unless you can provide dates and venues for the games alongside (as happens post-1995). For this reason, I am only including the tables on their own currently.
Once all the seasons are finished, I will create some supplementary pages like 'List of clubs by appearances in the Intertoto Cup', 'Records and Firsts in the Intertoto Cup' and a page on changing formats. All advice to me is very much appreciated. HibeeJibee ( talk) 15:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm usually quite a fast learner when it comes to contributing to Wikipedia, but with this one, I'm stuck. I really have no clue how to create kit designs on the article and I was wondering if someone could change the Histon home kit. The home kit looks like this, [2], and was released today in the local newspaper. As far as I know, the shorts and socks are still the same colour, but could someone change the Histon kit to stripes as in the picture on the page? Thanks. Jazza5 ( talk) 17:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)