This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks page. |
|
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is anybody currently using or updating the task list? It looks like many tasks were added a long time ago. I noticed some people signed & dated their additions. Is there any agreement as to whether dating all requests would be helpful? Cloveapple ( talk) 05:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I removed Pro se legal representation in the United States from the task list. It was oddly listed as non English literature that needed expansion, plus it seemed to be part of a sock puppet edit war by the person that posted it. Cloveapple ( talk) 22:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
With 35 sections on this talk page, more than half the space is taken by only one of them, and that's a discussion on whether to use the term "progressive" or "reform". Could the systemic bias on wikipedia be illustrated more clearly than that? DS Belgium ( talk) 13:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
It seems that once again, I am the only person maintaining the list. There should be more people contributing to the list. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 03:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
It is very unfortunate that I am the most active person on this WikiProject. It would be better if more people can take part in it. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 02:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Ipigott ( talk) 15:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
For context:
As of now the contents at Cyber Anakin had been restored, however since the instigator of the removals and the whole larger incident is back after months of inactivity, it’s requested that you keep tab on the article for the time being. If any untoward incidents occur please either revert the changes or report it to the admins straight away where you can let them know about the news articles as well.
The Wikipedia Oversight team may need to be pinged too as the instigator and their cohorts were spotted putting up gaming/abusing legitimate on-wiki processes to put up doxxing/outing/smearing page(s) making personal attacks against the defenders back in 2022 immediately after they were exposed by news media, just in case. 38.99.82.242 ( talk) 09:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, extra due diligence is necessary since if I remembered correctly, the edit war instigator and their cohort may had the ability to compromise the VPN networks of some users who were defending the preservation of the content and impersonate them in order to revert their changes and further smearing their character through joe-jobbing. A red flag to look for is if an IP (including mine!) had a “sudden change of mind” and go over to the instigator’s side by reverting changes made prior by people who were inhibiting the instigator. 38.99.82.242 ( talk) 10:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks page. |
|
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is anybody currently using or updating the task list? It looks like many tasks were added a long time ago. I noticed some people signed & dated their additions. Is there any agreement as to whether dating all requests would be helpful? Cloveapple ( talk) 05:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I removed Pro se legal representation in the United States from the task list. It was oddly listed as non English literature that needed expansion, plus it seemed to be part of a sock puppet edit war by the person that posted it. Cloveapple ( talk) 22:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
With 35 sections on this talk page, more than half the space is taken by only one of them, and that's a discussion on whether to use the term "progressive" or "reform". Could the systemic bias on wikipedia be illustrated more clearly than that? DS Belgium ( talk) 13:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
It seems that once again, I am the only person maintaining the list. There should be more people contributing to the list. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 03:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
It is very unfortunate that I am the most active person on this WikiProject. It would be better if more people can take part in it. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 02:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Ipigott ( talk) 15:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
For context:
As of now the contents at Cyber Anakin had been restored, however since the instigator of the removals and the whole larger incident is back after months of inactivity, it’s requested that you keep tab on the article for the time being. If any untoward incidents occur please either revert the changes or report it to the admins straight away where you can let them know about the news articles as well.
The Wikipedia Oversight team may need to be pinged too as the instigator and their cohorts were spotted putting up gaming/abusing legitimate on-wiki processes to put up doxxing/outing/smearing page(s) making personal attacks against the defenders back in 2022 immediately after they were exposed by news media, just in case. 38.99.82.242 ( talk) 09:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, extra due diligence is necessary since if I remembered correctly, the edit war instigator and their cohort may had the ability to compromise the VPN networks of some users who were defending the preservation of the content and impersonate them in order to revert their changes and further smearing their character through joe-jobbing. A red flag to look for is if an IP (including mine!) had a “sudden change of mind” and go over to the instigator’s side by reverting changes made prior by people who were inhibiting the instigator. 38.99.82.242 ( talk) 10:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)