Computer science Project‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
I would nominate some items from my todo list, but the directions don't make sense. Template:CSCOTW isn't valid; should it be added after nomination, or after confirmation? -- Mgreenbe 00:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure that I understand why the number of votes required (and final dates) for the current nominees was just changed. Shouldn't the votes just be tallied at the end of this week, and the nominee with the highest number of votes designated the "winner" for this week? Instead, it looks like voting has been continued for an extra week. Are we turning this into a "once every two weeks" collaboration? -- Allan McInnes ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I have a good candidate, though I'm not going to nominate it right now. Check out Object-oriented analysis and design: isn't that a terrible amount of mergefroms? -- bmills 00:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, the deadline for voting seems to have passed. I guess that means the CS article is now the COTW. Shall we work on it? -- Allan McInnes ( talk) 18:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes. BTW why is there only one candidate, my nomination? -- D e ryc k C. 09:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Why was this page moved? There was no discussion at all. Also I note that there are two subpages that didn't get moved with it. -- Ideogram 11:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Computer science Project‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
I would nominate some items from my todo list, but the directions don't make sense. Template:CSCOTW isn't valid; should it be added after nomination, or after confirmation? -- Mgreenbe 00:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure that I understand why the number of votes required (and final dates) for the current nominees was just changed. Shouldn't the votes just be tallied at the end of this week, and the nominee with the highest number of votes designated the "winner" for this week? Instead, it looks like voting has been continued for an extra week. Are we turning this into a "once every two weeks" collaboration? -- Allan McInnes ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I have a good candidate, though I'm not going to nominate it right now. Check out Object-oriented analysis and design: isn't that a terrible amount of mergefroms? -- bmills 00:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, the deadline for voting seems to have passed. I guess that means the CS article is now the COTW. Shall we work on it? -- Allan McInnes ( talk) 18:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes. BTW why is there only one candidate, my nomination? -- D e ryc k C. 09:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Why was this page moved? There was no discussion at all. Also I note that there are two subpages that didn't get moved with it. -- Ideogram 11:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)