This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
"Why this article is a part of WikiProject Cartoon Network?" To answer that question, I have new ideas.
By the way, are these within the scope of the project?
JSH-alive talk to me see my works mail to me 08:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Just because he's not a member, doesn't mean he can't submit ideas, Driveus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Right, going away for one week to unmuddle some stuff and try and figure out the best way forwards for here. Anything for me can be plonked onto my talkpage, don't change too much whilst I'm gone.
Oh yeah, before I set off I'd like to tell you all that I've archived some of the talkpage (don't touch it), I'll be thinking about implementing the class and importance system I've mentioned and to clear up the confusion surrounding what our project scope is it's very simple. Anything after 1995 is ours, WB produced and CN aired shows are also as the European co-productions, licensed shows are not, no matter where they show. Have fun whilst I'm gone, I need more input from Squirepants, Black Kat and Vinch so get them in and start knocking some heads together! -- treelo talk 00:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Treelo, I think nothing occurred because more than half of the users here are busy doing something else not involving Wikipedia or WP:Cartoon Network to be more specific. They just joined and nothing more. Plus you're the leader. We follow you (I think). If you think this project has a lack of parcipitaion look at my other project for TUGS. Some of the users haven't edited in days/weeks. This project had more motion during the time you were gone then WP:TUGS a week ago. Driveus
Notice a new addition to the template? That's the assessment scale, something to help us push articles to our much-loved B-Class status. We will need to do two things, add the template to the remainder of the articles under our steely glare and and class them as per the assessment scale here.
Simple to add, use the old {{Cartoon Network}} but with the added element of the |class=? just after the work Network, e.g {{Cartoon Network|class=B}} generating:
{{Cartoon Network|class=B}} The system goes a bit further on the Assessment page for the project but here's a quick rundown.
{{Cartoon Network |class=NA/Stub/Start/C/B/GA/A/FA |small=yes/no |auto=yes/no |peer-review=yes/no |old-peer-review=yes/no }}
Further details are on the assessment page, usage details on the template page. Now go forth and classify! Any question, just add 'em. -- treelo talk 22:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Since the userbox T-borg created is kind of out of date here is the one I'm using.
CN | This user is a member of WikiProject Cartoon Network. |
I think we need a code thing for this. Anyone agree? Driveus
Does anyone think we should have a related or disendent (incorrect spelling) wikiproject section? I'm guessing this project's parent project is WP:Television. The main page is a little short since Treelo removed the Scope section. Driveus
Ok, I've added two more sections, dubbed "categories" by mistake in the edit summary. What do you say? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to be leaving Wikipedia for a while to concentrate on my Youtube life. Treelo, I am leaving you fully in charge good luck. Driveus
Ok, this page was purged from most of the non-notable characters, one timers definitely got deleted. How's it look now? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 16:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, we don't have any policies whatsoever but I had no idea what else to call it so here goes. I'm proposing that any of the edits relating to the touchy subject of fancruft can be discussed at the fancruft talkpage which I created. Respond in the usual manner for decisions using Oppose or Approve. I was going to shift T-borg's recent edit summary to the page but until a consensus is reached, it'll remain here. -- treelo talk 20:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
As the title says I'll be coming to Wikipedia, mostly to check up on my other project, and see how this project is going. So far I see that Squirepants lost interest and left. I know this project can do better, I'm sure of it. See you all in June. Driveus
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
"Why this article is a part of WikiProject Cartoon Network?" To answer that question, I have new ideas.
By the way, are these within the scope of the project?
JSH-alive talk to me see my works mail to me 08:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Just because he's not a member, doesn't mean he can't submit ideas, Driveus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Right, going away for one week to unmuddle some stuff and try and figure out the best way forwards for here. Anything for me can be plonked onto my talkpage, don't change too much whilst I'm gone.
Oh yeah, before I set off I'd like to tell you all that I've archived some of the talkpage (don't touch it), I'll be thinking about implementing the class and importance system I've mentioned and to clear up the confusion surrounding what our project scope is it's very simple. Anything after 1995 is ours, WB produced and CN aired shows are also as the European co-productions, licensed shows are not, no matter where they show. Have fun whilst I'm gone, I need more input from Squirepants, Black Kat and Vinch so get them in and start knocking some heads together! -- treelo talk 00:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Treelo, I think nothing occurred because more than half of the users here are busy doing something else not involving Wikipedia or WP:Cartoon Network to be more specific. They just joined and nothing more. Plus you're the leader. We follow you (I think). If you think this project has a lack of parcipitaion look at my other project for TUGS. Some of the users haven't edited in days/weeks. This project had more motion during the time you were gone then WP:TUGS a week ago. Driveus
Notice a new addition to the template? That's the assessment scale, something to help us push articles to our much-loved B-Class status. We will need to do two things, add the template to the remainder of the articles under our steely glare and and class them as per the assessment scale here.
Simple to add, use the old {{Cartoon Network}} but with the added element of the |class=? just after the work Network, e.g {{Cartoon Network|class=B}} generating:
{{Cartoon Network|class=B}} The system goes a bit further on the Assessment page for the project but here's a quick rundown.
{{Cartoon Network |class=NA/Stub/Start/C/B/GA/A/FA |small=yes/no |auto=yes/no |peer-review=yes/no |old-peer-review=yes/no }}
Further details are on the assessment page, usage details on the template page. Now go forth and classify! Any question, just add 'em. -- treelo talk 22:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Since the userbox T-borg created is kind of out of date here is the one I'm using.
CN | This user is a member of WikiProject Cartoon Network. |
I think we need a code thing for this. Anyone agree? Driveus
Does anyone think we should have a related or disendent (incorrect spelling) wikiproject section? I'm guessing this project's parent project is WP:Television. The main page is a little short since Treelo removed the Scope section. Driveus
Ok, I've added two more sections, dubbed "categories" by mistake in the edit summary. What do you say? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to be leaving Wikipedia for a while to concentrate on my Youtube life. Treelo, I am leaving you fully in charge good luck. Driveus
Ok, this page was purged from most of the non-notable characters, one timers definitely got deleted. How's it look now? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 16:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, we don't have any policies whatsoever but I had no idea what else to call it so here goes. I'm proposing that any of the edits relating to the touchy subject of fancruft can be discussed at the fancruft talkpage which I created. Respond in the usual manner for decisions using Oppose or Approve. I was going to shift T-borg's recent edit summary to the page but until a consensus is reached, it'll remain here. -- treelo talk 20:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
As the title says I'll be coming to Wikipedia, mostly to check up on my other project, and see how this project is going. So far I see that Squirepants lost interest and left. I know this project can do better, I'm sure of it. See you all in June. Driveus